Song of the Moment: Sirens

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

So...Sirens?

5 stars
47
38%
4 stars
30
24%
3 stars
25
20%
2 stars
7
6%
1 star
16
13%
 
Total votes: 125

User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Jorge »

Oh. That wasn't so bad.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Jorge »

waaaaaaait a minute
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Jorge »

You'd rank it higher than most of No Code :gomez:
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by VinylGuy »

Why you are...
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

theplatypus wrote:You'd rank it higher than most of No Code :gomez:
Songs I prefer Sirens to: Sometimes, Smile, Off He goes, habit, Lukin, Mankind, I'm Open, Around the Bend

Songs equal to sirens: Who you are, present tense

Songs better than sirens, In My Tree, Hail Hail, Red Mosquito
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Im not sure how it will effect stips list, but songs shouldn't be able to be ranked until the newness wears off
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

yup, that's a huge caveat
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by verb_to_trust »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Yield with no 4's :cop:
Dick/Balls
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by mastaflatch »

verb_to_trust wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Yield with no 4's :cop:
one can only hope there's many fives on there :shake:
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by mastaflatch »

Sirens is good. it's a pretty successful exercise in style.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

mastaflatch wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Yield with no 4's :cop:
one can only hope there's many fives on there :shake:
Yield is 5s and 3s
User avatar
Neo
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed September 04, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Macedonia
Contact:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Neo »

I'd like to hear unplugged version of Sirens, with just Mike on acoustic and Ed on vocal. That would definitely sound better to my ears.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

Neo wrote:I'd like to hear unplugged version of Sirens, with just Mike on acoustic and Ed on vocal. That would definitely sound better to my ears.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
I think the length of the song may have impacted the length of the solo. It's almost 6 minutes as it is.
I can hear the acoustic and especially Stone's electric well enough though. I think it's more the compression that hurt the mix than the mix itself. This song in particular would benefit from a wider dynamic range or better space that compression when overused compromises. Especially the busiest parts sound claustrophobic.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

stip wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Yield with no 4's :cop:
one can only hope there's many fives on there :shake:
Yield is 5s and 3s
what all did you give 5s to ? GTF and DTE ?
User avatar
Mike
Future Drummer
Posts: 3130
Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mike »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
stip wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Yield with no 4's :cop:
one can only hope there's many fives on there :shake:
Yield is 5s and 3s
what all did you give 5s to ? GTF and DTE ?
Wishlist is gonna be the third one.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

Still pretty much an average beginning for a second single at radio. It's got about half the plays and half the audience size that Mind Your Manners had within the same time frame...typical follow-up figures. Just Breathe was doing better by this point, but that was an exception. Otherwise it's business as usual. The only real point worth noting is that it's already at #10 on Triple A. That's typically a very slow moving chart. A fast climbing song might typically reach as high as #25 or so, after two weeks.

Mind Your Manners is still #11 at Active rock and #7 at Mainstream after 12 weeks. It's losing numbers by the day, but will definitely match or best WWS before falling off.

Mind Your Manners is also a pretty good example of why Billboard chart history is often misleading about past successes. In looking at Pearl Jam's Alt-radio statistics on their website, you'd see the following information:

Mind Your Manners
Peak: 12
Weeks: 11

Amongst the Waves
Peak: 17
Weeks: 13

While you can see that Manners did better than Waves, it doesn't look like all that extreme a difference. Manners spent a total of seven weeks in the 12-14 range, however, while Waves peaked at 17 fairly early on and then floated around the bottom of the chart for a long while without much impact. As a result, Manners managed nearly 10,000 plays and an average audience size of 3.6 million at Alt-radio alone. Amongst the Waves, by comparison, received less than 4,000 spins and had an average audience size of about one million.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
Neo wrote:I'd like to hear unplugged version of Sirens, with just Mike on acoustic and Ed on vocal. That would definitely sound better to my ears.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
I think the length of the song may have impacted the length of the solo. It's almost 6 minutes as it is.
I can hear the acoustic and especially Stone's electric well enough though. I think it's more the compression that hurt the mix than the mix itself. This song in particular would benefit from a wider dynamic range or better space that compression when overused compromises. Especially the busiest parts sound claustrophobic.
I find the live version on the video pretty clunky, but the only reason I prefer it is the strummed electric in some parts. It reminds us it's actually a rock song, and the studio version doesn't have it. But there are two guitars, as Mine says: Mike's twelve-string acoustic, and Stone's electric which is washed in reverb and is mostly punctuating the song every now and then. Both things are nice but you do have to listen pretty hard for them... I guess I feel lucky that I don't hate the piano, and it's all fairly bass-heavy which is nice as well.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 675
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

harmless wrote:I find the live version on the video pretty clunky, but the only reason I prefer it is the strummed electric in some parts. It reminds us it's actually a rock song, and the studio version doesn't have it. But there are two guitars, as Mine says: Mike's twelve-string acoustic, and Stone's electric which is washed in reverb and is mostly punctuating the song every now and then. Both things are nice but you do have to listen pretty hard for them... I guess I feel lucky that I don't hate the piano, and it's all fairly bass-heavy which is nice as well.
The problem with the bassy piano is that Jeff plays a really simple line to avoid clogging up the low end - I'd prefer a more innovative bassline and no piano - although it is nice in parts. I can hear the guitars fine on this too but it is a busy arrangement so you need decent speakers / headphones to avoid it being the wrong kind of wall of sound.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
harmless wrote:I find the live version on the video pretty clunky, but the only reason I prefer it is the strummed electric in some parts. It reminds us it's actually a rock song, and the studio version doesn't have it. But there are two guitars, as Mine says: Mike's twelve-string acoustic, and Stone's electric which is washed in reverb and is mostly punctuating the song every now and then. Both things are nice but you do have to listen pretty hard for them... I guess I feel lucky that I don't hate the piano, and it's all fairly bass-heavy which is nice as well.
The problem with the bassy piano is that Jeff plays a really simple line to avoid clogging up the low end - I'd prefer a more innovative bassline and no piano - although it is nice in parts. I can hear the guitars fine on this too but it is a busy arrangement so you need decent speakers / headphones to avoid it being the wrong kind of wall of sound.
I'm listening to simple cheap earbuds, but I hear what you're saying. If I could afford great headphones the song would sound better. And I also hear what you're saying about the low end piano forcing Jeff to rein it in a bit. I feel a more complex bassline could've added to the groove as well as the general "Pearl Jam" feel of the song. Black is made so much stronger because Jeff is allowed to play around the frets. I guess what you feel about Jeff's simpler part here will depend on whether you think the inclusion of the piano was worth it. That's a hard question to answer, but there are parts of the piano I love and parts I wish weren't there. All in all I like it, but I might prefer it if it wondered in and out more and the bass was allowed to muck around slightly over the groovy drums. I'm happy that, like ATW (which I liked but others didn't), it's the drums kind of "driving" this song. Matt would be playing it more sensitively, maybe in a Light Years way, if there were thicker guitars. But because there aren't, he doesn't.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
Post Reply