Song of the Moment: Sirens
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Oh. That wasn't so bad.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
waaaaaaait a minute
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
You'd rank it higher than most of No Code 
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43421
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Songs I prefer Sirens to: Sometimes, Smile, Off He goes, habit, Lukin, Mankind, I'm Open, Around the Bendtheplatypus wrote:You'd rank it higher than most of No Code
Songs equal to sirens: Who you are, present tense
Songs better than sirens, In My Tree, Hail Hail, Red Mosquito
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Im not sure how it will effect stips list, but songs shouldn't be able to be ranked until the newness wears offE.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
yup, that's a huge caveat
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Yield with no 4'sE.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
Dick/Balls
- mastaflatch
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
one can only hope there's many fives on thereverb_to_trust wrote:Yield with no 4'sE.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
- mastaflatch
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Sirens is good. it's a pretty successful exercise in style.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Yield is 5s and 3smastaflatch wrote:one can only hope there's many fives on thereverb_to_trust wrote:Yield with no 4'sE.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Neo
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed September 04, 2013 8:44 pm
- Location: Macedonia
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I'd like to hear unplugged version of Sirens, with just Mike on acoustic and Ed on vocal. That would definitely sound better to my ears.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I think the length of the song may have impacted the length of the solo. It's almost 6 minutes as it is.Neo wrote:I'd like to hear unplugged version of Sirens, with just Mike on acoustic and Ed on vocal. That would definitely sound better to my ears.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
I can hear the acoustic and especially Stone's electric well enough though. I think it's more the compression that hurt the mix than the mix itself. This song in particular would benefit from a wider dynamic range or better space that compression when overused compromises. Especially the busiest parts sound claustrophobic.
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
what all did you give 5s to ? GTF and DTE ?stip wrote:Yield is 5s and 3smastaflatch wrote:one can only hope there's many fives on thereverb_to_trust wrote:Yield with no 4'sE.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
- Mike
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3130
- Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
- Location: Baltic Sea, Germany
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Wishlist is gonna be the third one.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:what all did you give 5s to ? GTF and DTE ?stip wrote:Yield is 5s and 3smastaflatch wrote:one can only hope there's many fives on thereverb_to_trust wrote:Yield with no 4'sE.H. Ruddock wrote:I try to be a stip apologist whenever I can, but that list is not helping things.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Still pretty much an average beginning for a second single at radio. It's got about half the plays and half the audience size that Mind Your Manners had within the same time frame...typical follow-up figures. Just Breathe was doing better by this point, but that was an exception. Otherwise it's business as usual. The only real point worth noting is that it's already at #10 on Triple A. That's typically a very slow moving chart. A fast climbing song might typically reach as high as #25 or so, after two weeks.
Mind Your Manners is still #11 at Active rock and #7 at Mainstream after 12 weeks. It's losing numbers by the day, but will definitely match or best WWS before falling off.
Mind Your Manners is also a pretty good example of why Billboard chart history is often misleading about past successes. In looking at Pearl Jam's Alt-radio statistics on their website, you'd see the following information:
Mind Your Manners
Peak: 12
Weeks: 11
Amongst the Waves
Peak: 17
Weeks: 13
While you can see that Manners did better than Waves, it doesn't look like all that extreme a difference. Manners spent a total of seven weeks in the 12-14 range, however, while Waves peaked at 17 fairly early on and then floated around the bottom of the chart for a long while without much impact. As a result, Manners managed nearly 10,000 plays and an average audience size of 3.6 million at Alt-radio alone. Amongst the Waves, by comparison, received less than 4,000 spins and had an average audience size of about one million.
Mind Your Manners is still #11 at Active rock and #7 at Mainstream after 12 weeks. It's losing numbers by the day, but will definitely match or best WWS before falling off.
Mind Your Manners is also a pretty good example of why Billboard chart history is often misleading about past successes. In looking at Pearl Jam's Alt-radio statistics on their website, you'd see the following information:
Mind Your Manners
Peak: 12
Weeks: 11
Amongst the Waves
Peak: 17
Weeks: 13
While you can see that Manners did better than Waves, it doesn't look like all that extreme a difference. Manners spent a total of seven weeks in the 12-14 range, however, while Waves peaked at 17 fairly early on and then floated around the bottom of the chart for a long while without much impact. As a result, Manners managed nearly 10,000 plays and an average audience size of 3.6 million at Alt-radio alone. Amongst the Waves, by comparison, received less than 4,000 spins and had an average audience size of about one million.
(patriotic choking noises)
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I find the live version on the video pretty clunky, but the only reason I prefer it is the strummed electric in some parts. It reminds us it's actually a rock song, and the studio version doesn't have it. But there are two guitars, as Mine says: Mike's twelve-string acoustic, and Stone's electric which is washed in reverb and is mostly punctuating the song every now and then. Both things are nice but you do have to listen pretty hard for them... I guess I feel lucky that I don't hate the piano, and it's all fairly bass-heavy which is nice as well.Mine wrote:I think the length of the song may have impacted the length of the solo. It's almost 6 minutes as it is.Neo wrote:I'd like to hear unplugged version of Sirens, with just Mike on acoustic and Ed on vocal. That would definitely sound better to my ears.
On the studio version, the guitars are drowned in the background, its just Ed, Matt and Brendan on the piano for the most of the song... and only 15 seconds(wtf?) solo by Mike.
I can hear the acoustic and especially Stone's electric well enough though. I think it's more the compression that hurt the mix than the mix itself. This song in particular would benefit from a wider dynamic range or better space that compression when overused compromises. Especially the busiest parts sound claustrophobic.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Blenheim Augustine
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
The problem with the bassy piano is that Jeff plays a really simple line to avoid clogging up the low end - I'd prefer a more innovative bassline and no piano - although it is nice in parts. I can hear the guitars fine on this too but it is a busy arrangement so you need decent speakers / headphones to avoid it being the wrong kind of wall of sound.harmless wrote:I find the live version on the video pretty clunky, but the only reason I prefer it is the strummed electric in some parts. It reminds us it's actually a rock song, and the studio version doesn't have it. But there are two guitars, as Mine says: Mike's twelve-string acoustic, and Stone's electric which is washed in reverb and is mostly punctuating the song every now and then. Both things are nice but you do have to listen pretty hard for them... I guess I feel lucky that I don't hate the piano, and it's all fairly bass-heavy which is nice as well.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I'm listening to simple cheap earbuds, but I hear what you're saying. If I could afford great headphones the song would sound better. And I also hear what you're saying about the low end piano forcing Jeff to rein it in a bit. I feel a more complex bassline could've added to the groove as well as the general "Pearl Jam" feel of the song. Black is made so much stronger because Jeff is allowed to play around the frets. I guess what you feel about Jeff's simpler part here will depend on whether you think the inclusion of the piano was worth it. That's a hard question to answer, but there are parts of the piano I love and parts I wish weren't there. All in all I like it, but I might prefer it if it wondered in and out more and the bass was allowed to muck around slightly over the groovy drums. I'm happy that, like ATW (which I liked but others didn't), it's the drums kind of "driving" this song. Matt would be playing it more sensitively, maybe in a Light Years way, if there were thicker guitars. But because there aren't, he doesn't.Blenheim Augustine wrote:The problem with the bassy piano is that Jeff plays a really simple line to avoid clogging up the low end - I'd prefer a more innovative bassline and no piano - although it is nice in parts. I can hear the guitars fine on this too but it is a busy arrangement so you need decent speakers / headphones to avoid it being the wrong kind of wall of sound.harmless wrote:I find the live version on the video pretty clunky, but the only reason I prefer it is the strummed electric in some parts. It reminds us it's actually a rock song, and the studio version doesn't have it. But there are two guitars, as Mine says: Mike's twelve-string acoustic, and Stone's electric which is washed in reverb and is mostly punctuating the song every now and then. Both things are nice but you do have to listen pretty hard for them... I guess I feel lucky that I don't hate the piano, and it's all fairly bass-heavy which is nice as well.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.