Are you not not going to watch the Oscars this year?
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
who cares what they think?Mickey wrote:I wonder what conservatives think about last night. Is Will Smith a hero for fulfilling the role of patriarch and defending his family? Is Chris Rock just another victim of cancel culture and the loony left's policing of language? Is the whole thing a big pedophile celebration? Much to consider.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
yeah, by using the actual text spoken, instead of grasping at strawsspike wrote:whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
really? amazingtree_ wrote:Point taken. I did extrapolate. Love you, meaning, he loves her. That's already a sign he's being nice. Then, he says, GI Jane 2, ... knowing Chris Rock thought her hairstyle was a choice, he was just saying, you have short hair. He didn't say it was ugly, or say anything like that. Right? Wouldn't you think he'd compare her to someone unattractive like Shrek if he were trying to hurt her feelings, instead of Demi Moore? Just tell me how you think any of that is insulting, please.Ms Harmless wrote:he didn't literally say anything you're arguing he literally saidtree_ wrote:I'm going to quote him word for word, so we can leave interpretations out of it:Ms Harmless wrote:he used none of those words, not onewarehouse wrote:tree_ wrote:No, listen.. it's what he said. He said, you look like her, who is attractive. He thought short her was her choice, her style, and complimented her. I struggle to see any insult there. Even more so now that he says he didn't even know she had baldness. You struggle to not find an insult, because it's your default.Ms Harmless wrote:you can parrot "she's hot though" till you're blue in the face, it doesn't get any deepertree_ wrote:Again, pretty sure he was just complimenting how well she was pulling off the short hair... and yet he gets physically assaulted.. so may be harder than you think. Maybe you could just joke about, like, .. well i guess there's nothing left when there's crazy in the roomMs Harmless wrote:you're asking a disabled trans girl, someone who is the subject of bad comedy constantly; I wouldn't fear being punched because I would go out of my way to not base my comedy around insulting people; it's easier than you thinktree_ wrote:Would you feel comfortable if he were in the front row and your job was to make the audience laugh?Ms Harmless wrote:I'm not going to say "Will is crazy" based on any of the evidence given here, sorry
we are arguing over things we think he was silently conferring, and you are trying to re-steer me into some correct position in which your interpretation of what he was inferring -- if we read between the lines -- is the right one
it's weird
"Jada, I love ya, GI Jane 2, can't wait to see it, alright?"
then he begins to look as baffled as I feel
love you Tree uwu
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I'm curious about it, the same way I was curious how they wrapped their brains around when Lia Thomas lost to another trans swimmer (female to male). It is interesting to watch an incoherent ideological framework try to assimilate something that exceeds their grasp, on a logical level, and to see how they manage the cognitive dissonance these events introduce.Ms Harmless wrote:who cares what they think?Mickey wrote:I wonder what conservatives think about last night. Is Will Smith a hero for fulfilling the role of patriarch and defending his family? Is Chris Rock just another victim of cancel culture and the loony left's policing of language? Is the whole thing a big pedophile celebration? Much to consider.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Not curious enough to Google it, but curious all the same.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7385
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
you mean how you used the actual text spoken?tree_ wrote:yeah, by using the actual text spoken, instead of grasping at strawsspike wrote:whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15816
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
https://www.theamericanconservative.com ... it-coming/Mickey wrote:I'm curious about it, the same way I was curious how they wrapped their brains around when Lia Thomas lost to another trans swimmer (female to male). It is interesting to watch an incoherent ideological framework try to assimilate something that exceeds their grasp, on a logical level, and to see how they manage the cognitive dissonance these events introduce.Ms Harmless wrote:who cares what they think?Mickey wrote:I wonder what conservatives think about last night. Is Will Smith a hero for fulfilling the role of patriarch and defending his family? Is Chris Rock just another victim of cancel culture and the loony left's policing of language? Is the whole thing a big pedophile celebration? Much to consider.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
i interpret what you just said as a hate crime.. but i will not explain how i got there.. it just... felt that way to meMs Harmless wrote:really? amazingtree_ wrote:Point taken. I did extrapolate. Love you, meaning, he loves her. That's already a sign he's being nice. Then, he says, GI Jane 2, ... knowing Chris Rock thought her hairstyle was a choice, he was just saying, you have short hair. He didn't say it was ugly, or say anything like that. Right? Wouldn't you think he'd compare her to someone unattractive like Shrek if he were trying to hurt her feelings, instead of Demi Moore? Just tell me how you think any of that is insulting, please.Ms Harmless wrote:he didn't literally say anything you're arguing he literally saidtree_ wrote:I'm going to quote him word for word, so we can leave interpretations out of it:Ms Harmless wrote:he used none of those words, not onewarehouse wrote:tree_ wrote:No, listen.. it's what he said. He said, you look like her, who is attractive. He thought short her was her choice, her style, and complimented her. I struggle to see any insult there. Even more so now that he says he didn't even know she had baldness. You struggle to not find an insult, because it's your default.Ms Harmless wrote:you can parrot "she's hot though" till you're blue in the face, it doesn't get any deepertree_ wrote:Again, pretty sure he was just complimenting how well she was pulling off the short hair... and yet he gets physically assaulted.. so may be harder than you think. Maybe you could just joke about, like, .. well i guess there's nothing left when there's crazy in the roomMs Harmless wrote:you're asking a disabled trans girl, someone who is the subject of bad comedy constantly; I wouldn't fear being punched because I would go out of my way to not base my comedy around insulting people; it's easier than you thinktree_ wrote:Would you feel comfortable if he were in the front row and your job was to make the audience laugh?Ms Harmless wrote:I'm not going to say "Will is crazy" based on any of the evidence given here, sorry
we are arguing over things we think he was silently conferring, and you are trying to re-steer me into some correct position in which your interpretation of what he was inferring -- if we read between the lines -- is the right one
it's weird
"Jada, I love ya, GI Jane 2, can't wait to see it, alright?"
then he begins to look as baffled as I feel
love you Tree uwu
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
yesMs Harmless wrote:you mean how you used the actual text spoken?tree_ wrote:yeah, by using the actual text spoken, instead of grasping at strawsspike wrote:whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
That makes sense coming from Rod, but he doesn't represent all conservatives. He doesn't speak for his people.washing machine wrote:https://www.theamericanconservative.com ... it-coming/Mickey wrote:I'm curious about it, the same way I was curious how they wrapped their brains around when Lia Thomas lost to another trans swimmer (female to male). It is interesting to watch an incoherent ideological framework try to assimilate something that exceeds their grasp, on a logical level, and to see how they manage the cognitive dissonance these events introduce.Ms Harmless wrote:who cares what they think?Mickey wrote:I wonder what conservatives think about last night. Is Will Smith a hero for fulfilling the role of patriarch and defending his family? Is Chris Rock just another victim of cancel culture and the loony left's policing of language? Is the whole thing a big pedophile celebration? Much to consider.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
If you think I'm upset then you definitely do not have a handle on things here. I am merely pointing out that your summary--that we differ on "relative subjectivities"--is incorrect.Ms Harmless wrote:and I still stand by?Mickey wrote:That's also not true--at no point did I attempt to summarize your argument beyond repeating your claim (that Will Smith smacking Chris Rock was an act of resistance, something you said in this very thread).Ms Harmless wrote:you also had an inaccurate summary of my argumentsMickey wrote:Your summary of the above conversation is inaccurate.Ms Harmless wrote:we land on you're right, I'm wrong? whatever you want MickeyMickey wrote:No, that's not where we land.
of course you're gonna say that; of course I'm gonna say that
who wins?
and you repeated to go "lol" and point out how ridiculous it was? it was one word; if you're upset by me interpreting your words and relaying what I understand of them back to you, maybe you'll accept that I might be upset that I typed a whole lot of stuff and you chose one word of it to isolate and mock
I used the word very consciously; it's a word I use when someone employs "violent" means to "punch up", as opposed to when someone is "punching down", or laterally; I don't think I have to explain those concepts to you, but this fight wasn't two men having a contest over the size of their dicks; if it was just that I wouldn't care
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
having the simplest and most lazily thought-through interpretation and extrapolation of the text possible is not the same thingtree_ wrote:yesMs Harmless wrote:you mean how you used the actual text spoken?tree_ wrote:yeah, by using the actual text spoken, instead of grasping at strawsspike wrote:whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11939
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
here you go, tree
Please consider voting for me
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15816
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Oh, you're looking for a Tucker C hot take, aren't you? I can't help you there.Mickey wrote:That makes sense coming from Rod, but he doesn't represent all conservatives. He doesn't speak for his people.washing machine wrote:https://www.theamericanconservative.com ... it-coming/Mickey wrote:I'm curious about it, the same way I was curious how they wrapped their brains around when Lia Thomas lost to another trans swimmer (female to male). It is interesting to watch an incoherent ideological framework try to assimilate something that exceeds their grasp, on a logical level, and to see how they manage the cognitive dissonance these events introduce.Ms Harmless wrote:who cares what they think?Mickey wrote:I wonder what conservatives think about last night. Is Will Smith a hero for fulfilling the role of patriarch and defending his family? Is Chris Rock just another victim of cancel culture and the loony left's policing of language? Is the whole thing a big pedophile celebration? Much to consider.
Best I can do is my man Rod and also the conservative-adjacent folks over at reason.com
https://reason.com/2022/03/28/be-like-chris-rock/
https://reason.com/2022/03/28/will-smit ... ls-speech/
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
no... it was a simple, dumb joke, which can most easily be interpreted as a compliment.. and you're reading it as lashing out at the bald, black, female community.. i'm just confused how you got thereMs Harmless wrote:having the simplest and most lazily thought-through interpretation and extrapolation of the text possible is not the same thingtree_ wrote:yesMs Harmless wrote:you mean how you used the actual text spoken?tree_ wrote:yeah, by using the actual text spoken, instead of grasping at strawsspike wrote:whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
no, it's correctMickey wrote:If you think I'm upset then you definitely do not have a handle on things here. I am merely pointing out that your summary--that we differ on "relative subjectivities"--is incorrect.Ms Harmless wrote:and I still stand by?Mickey wrote:That's also not true--at no point did I attempt to summarize your argument beyond repeating your claim (that Will Smith smacking Chris Rock was an act of resistance, something you said in this very thread).Ms Harmless wrote:you also had an inaccurate summary of my argumentsMickey wrote:Your summary of the above conversation is inaccurate.Ms Harmless wrote:we land on you're right, I'm wrong? whatever you want MickeyMickey wrote:No, that's not where we land.
of course you're gonna say that; of course I'm gonna say that
who wins?
and you repeated to go "lol" and point out how ridiculous it was? it was one word; if you're upset by me interpreting your words and relaying what I understand of them back to you, maybe you'll accept that I might be upset that I typed a whole lot of stuff and you chose one word of it to isolate and mock
I used the word very consciously; it's a word I use when someone employs "violent" means to "punch up", as opposed to when someone is "punching down", or laterally; I don't think I have to explain those concepts to you, but this fight wasn't two men having a contest over the size of their dicks; if it was just that I wouldn't care
I think I'm right
you think you're right
you trust the things behind your convictions; I trust the things behind mine
nobody alive or dead is gonna definitively prove either position
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
How will the broader conservative movement deal with this crisis.washing machine wrote:Oh, you're looking for a Tucker C hot take, aren't you? I can't help you there.Mickey wrote:That makes sense coming from Rod, but he doesn't represent all conservatives. He doesn't speak for his people.washing machine wrote:https://www.theamericanconservative.com ... it-coming/Mickey wrote:I'm curious about it, the same way I was curious how they wrapped their brains around when Lia Thomas lost to another trans swimmer (female to male). It is interesting to watch an incoherent ideological framework try to assimilate something that exceeds their grasp, on a logical level, and to see how they manage the cognitive dissonance these events introduce.Ms Harmless wrote:who cares what they think?Mickey wrote:I wonder what conservatives think about last night. Is Will Smith a hero for fulfilling the role of patriarch and defending his family? Is Chris Rock just another victim of cancel culture and the loony left's policing of language? Is the whole thing a big pedophile celebration? Much to consider.
Best I can do is my man Rod and also the conservative-adjacent folks over at reason.com
https://reason.com/2022/03/28/be-like-chris-rock/
https://reason.com/2022/03/28/will-smit ... ls-speech/
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I don't give a shit how confused you are; things aren't wrong because they confuse you, Treetree_ wrote:no... it was a simple, dumb joke, which can most easily be interpreted as a compliment.. and you're reading it as lashing out at the bald, black, female community.. i'm just confused how you got thereMs Harmless wrote:having the simplest and most lazily thought-through interpretation and extrapolation of the text possible is not the same thingtree_ wrote:yesMs Harmless wrote:you mean how you used the actual text spoken?tree_ wrote:yeah, by using the actual text spoken, instead of grasping at strawsspike wrote:whoever said ten pages ago that the joke was racially loaded, please explain yourself.
