Are you not not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply

Select your response

Yes
10
45%
No
7
32%
The future is hazy
4
18%
Double negatives are really confusing
1
5%
 
Total votes: 22

Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

B wrote:If someone insults my wife, and I laugh until I turn and see her not laughing, the game is already over, and I didn't win.
personally I think his previous laugh was fake, but even if it wasn't, he's allowed to learn (quickly) that a joke meant something more than he'd accounted for, then act on it
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by spike »

Ms Harmless wrote:
spike wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:I think the joke deserved a slap
No joke deserves a slap. Put all sorts of other words in your endless posts, but you can’t get around this.
lol, I can easily get around this
Still waiting.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Bammer »

In their dreams Will Smith and Chris Rock could not have wished for 50+ pages of RM discussion about their stunt.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.
there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculous
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Mickey »

I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.
there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculous
It was an act of physical force intended to harm another person. That simple. The morality of when and where it is applied is another issue.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

spike wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
spike wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:I think the joke deserved a slap
No joke deserves a slap. Put all sorts of other words in your endless posts, but you can’t get around this.
lol, I can easily get around this
Still waiting.
you think I need to *do work* to get around it instead of just disagree and say I think you're wrong? you'll be waiting a while
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

she just feels that way spike
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Mickey »

Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by spike »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.
there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculous
He gave him a face high five! Yay!!!
Last edited by spike on Wed March 30, 2022 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.
there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculous
It was an act of physical force intended to harm another person. That simple. The morality of when and where it is applied is another issue.
Chris Rock wasn't lastingly harmed in any way; he's laughing about this

the "other issue" isn't one you care about, we've established that
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by VinylGuy »

Mickey wrote:Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
this dude was awesome on Dave
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Bammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
yep, it's absolutely ridiculous
You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.

vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/

noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Google

I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.
there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculous
It was an act of physical force intended to harm another person. That simple. The morality of when and where it is applied is another issue.
Chris Rock wasn't lastingly harmed in any way; he's laughing about this

the "other issue" isn't one you care about, we've established that
sure, he could have been more or less violent... still violence though

I do care about morality, though.. what on earth gave you the idea that I didn't? I am appalled by Will Smith.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by The Argonaut »

Mickey wrote:I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
words are violence
Please consider voting for me
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:she just feels that way spike
unless Spike can find me definitive, objective and scientific reasoning to prove beyond all doubt that "no joke deserves a slap", I'm perfectly happy with my own feelings on the matter

I was really hoping for more than "boys rational / objective; girl irrational / emotional", but you took it there, nice
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

The Argonaut wrote:
Mickey wrote:I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
words are violence
words can be violence, you've got it
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by The Argonaut »

Ms Harmless wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
Mickey wrote:I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
words are violence
words can be violence, you've got it
thank you
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:she just feels that way spike
unless Spike can find me definitive, objective and scientific reasoning to prove beyond all doubt that "no joke deserves a slap", I'm perfectly happy with my own feelings on the matter

I was really hoping for more than "boys rational / objective; girl irrational / emotional", but you took it there, nice
uhh.. did i say that? lmao, you are irrational, but not necessarily because of your sex or gender or skin color or anything

we've been over this... you refuse to walk us through your thought process. You say feelings trump all. If someone feels victimized, they have been victimized, right?
Post Reply