personally I think his previous laugh was fake, but even if it wasn't, he's allowed to learn (quickly) that a joke meant something more than he'd accounted for, then act on itB wrote:If someone insults my wife, and I laugh until I turn and see her not laughing, the game is already over, and I didn't win.
Are you not not going to watch the Oscars this year?
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35959
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Still waiting.Ms Harmless wrote:lol, I can easily get around thisspike wrote:No joke deserves a slap. Put all sorts of other words in your endless posts, but you can’t get around this.Ms Harmless wrote:I think the joke deserved a slap
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
In their dreams Will Smith and Chris Rock could not have wished for 50+ pages of RM discussion about their stunt.
(she/him/theirs)
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.Ms Harmless wrote:one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculoustree_ wrote:You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.Ms Harmless wrote:one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
It was an act of physical force intended to harm another person. That simple. The morality of when and where it is applied is another issue.Ms Harmless wrote:there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculoustree_ wrote:You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.Ms Harmless wrote:one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
you think I need to *do work* to get around it instead of just disagree and say I think you're wrong? you'll be waiting a whilespike wrote:Still waiting.Ms Harmless wrote:lol, I can easily get around thisspike wrote:No joke deserves a slap. Put all sorts of other words in your endless posts, but you can’t get around this.Ms Harmless wrote:I think the joke deserved a slap
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
she just feels that way spike
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35959
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
He gave him a face high five! Yay!!!Ms Harmless wrote:there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculoustree_ wrote:You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.Ms Harmless wrote:one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
Last edited by spike on Wed March 30, 2022 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Chris Rock wasn't lastingly harmed in any way; he's laughing about thistree_ wrote:It was an act of physical force intended to harm another person. That simple. The morality of when and where it is applied is another issue.Ms Harmless wrote:there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculoustree_ wrote:You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.Ms Harmless wrote:one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
the "other issue" isn't one you care about, we've established that
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43421
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
this dude was awesome on DaveMickey wrote:Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
sure, he could have been more or less violent... still violence thoughMs Harmless wrote:Chris Rock wasn't lastingly harmed in any way; he's laughing about thistree_ wrote:It was an act of physical force intended to harm another person. That simple. The morality of when and where it is applied is another issue.Ms Harmless wrote:there are many different definitions and understandings and interpretations of words, friend; it could be described as violence according to one, absolutely; I think that's ridiculoustree_ wrote:You said it's not violence. According to the definition of the word, it is violence.Ms Harmless wrote:one day you might learn to debate the morality of when and where violence and force is and isn't an appropriate response to antagonism, instead of just posting definitions from Googletree_ wrote:You commented before that it makes no difference to you whether he had fallen and knocked his head on something. It's violence.Ms Harmless wrote:yep, it's absolutely ridiculousBammer wrote:Lol people are describing this as “violence”
vi·o·lence
/ˈvī(ə)ləns/
noun
behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.
I think people expected me to be a pacifist and they're surprised that I'm not
the "other issue" isn't one you care about, we've established that
I do care about morality, though.. what on earth gave you the idea that I didn't? I am appalled by Will Smith.
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
words are violenceMickey wrote:I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
Please consider voting for me
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
unless Spike can find me definitive, objective and scientific reasoning to prove beyond all doubt that "no joke deserves a slap", I'm perfectly happy with my own feelings on the mattertree_ wrote:she just feels that way spike
I was really hoping for more than "boys rational / objective; girl irrational / emotional", but you took it there, nice
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
words can be violence, you've got itThe Argonaut wrote:words are violenceMickey wrote:I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
thank youMs Harmless wrote:words can be violence, you've got itThe Argonaut wrote:words are violenceMickey wrote:I am once again asking
Mickey wrote:What even are words, actually?
Please consider voting for me
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
uhh.. did i say that? lmao, you are irrational, but not necessarily because of your sex or gender or skin color or anythingMs Harmless wrote:unless Spike can find me definitive, objective and scientific reasoning to prove beyond all doubt that "no joke deserves a slap", I'm perfectly happy with my own feelings on the mattertree_ wrote:she just feels that way spike
I was really hoping for more than "boys rational / objective; girl irrational / emotional", but you took it there, nice
we've been over this... you refuse to walk us through your thought process. You say feelings trump all. If someone feels victimized, they have been victimized, right?