Are you not not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply

Select your response

Yes
10
45%
No
7
32%
The future is hazy
4
18%
Double negatives are really confusing
1
5%
 
Total votes: 22

User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Rob »

bart wrote:Took me a minute to figure out that post was not about chocolate toothpaste
:lol:

That post came out of nowhere!
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85155
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by epilogue »

tree_ wrote:Toothpaste needs to be just gross enough so that you don't want to swallow it. You don't want it tasting like chocolate pudding ffs
WHO THE FUCK SAID ANYTHING ABOUT PUDDING
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:some people can work through that

some people cheat because they are polyamorous, and aren't aware polyamorous is a thing they are allowed to be, or aren't in a social position to openly be out about

it's still cheating, and working forward from one person having cheated is a massive challenge, but if deciding to openly practice polyamory is one path to that, more power to them
So you're saying it's possible to be a non-practicing polyamorous person?
yes absolutely; polyamory imo is really two things, and they may cross over or not: natural orientation, or practice

I personally wouldn't say I'm naturally polyamorous; it took a lot of change and growth to get me to a position where I feel it's the best relationship style for me to practice (edit: one of my partners *is* naturally polyamorous though, and never found monogamy fulfilling)

it's like anything really, we know we're gay / straight / bi / pan, regardless of what we've done with whom
Last edited by Ms Harmless on Wed March 30, 2022 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

I'm willing to bet more people are "naturally polyamorous" than not. And I'm inclined to think not practicing it, in of itself, makes you not polyamorous
Last edited by tree_ on Wed March 30, 2022 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Anders »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Anders wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:why is "mint" the default flavour of toothpaste? it's gross
Which flavor do you like?
I would enjoy cinnamon
That would be interesting.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85155
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by epilogue »

Anders wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Anders wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:why is "mint" the default flavour of toothpaste? it's gross
Which flavor do you like?
I would enjoy cinnamon
That would be interesting.
It exists. Crest makes some.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

Tree, that would mean you would assume that a man who likes men but hasn't been with a man is not gay?
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Rob »

Wouldn't most of us be naturally inclined toward a polyamorous lifestyle, but then many of us commit to one person for a variety of reasons (and of course it's fine if you choose not to)?
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

I don't know what you do in that thinking with straight virgins
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:Tree, that would mean you would assume that a man who likes men but hasn't been with a man is not gay?
No, being gay is simply being attracted to people of your own sex. Polyamory is the act or practice of having sex with multiple partners. It's like, you may have the urge to murder people, but because you don't act on it, you're not actually a murderer.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

Rob wrote:Wouldn't most of us be naturally inclined toward a polyamorous lifestyle, but then many of us commit to one person for a variety of reasons (and of course it's fine if you choose not to)?
yeah, I think that's correct

I think it's far more likely that modern society and culture imposed monogamy on people than the other way around; it's certainly not the default setting in the animal kingdom (though it exists, obvs)
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Also, if you don't naturally have the urge to murder people, but somehow through some glitch in the matrix you find yourself having murdered somebody, you're still a murderer
User avatar
macphisto
Gone
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 am
Location: August 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by macphisto »

epilogue wrote:
Anders wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Anders wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:why is "mint" the default flavour of toothpaste? it's gross
Which flavor do you like?
I would enjoy cinnamon
That would be interesting.
It exists. Crest makes some.
I use mint toothpaste and cinnamon floss. It’s a one-two punch slap of freshness to the face.
Dev wrote:You're whole platform is about normalizing idiocy.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:Tree, that would mean you would assume that a man who likes men but hasn't been with a man is not gay?
No, being gay is simply being attracted to people of your own sex. Polyamory is the act or practice of having sex with multiple partners. It's like, you may have the urge to murder people, but because you don't act on it, you're not actually a murderer.
being polyamorous is living open to the potential of your romantic and / or sexual relationships going beyond one partner; that's it; who I'm currently dating or not dating makes no difference; if my (hypothetical) polycule of three break up and we're all single, we haven't all become monogamous again
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:Also, if you don't naturally have the urge to murder people, but somehow through some glitch in the matrix you find yourself having murdered somebody, you're still a murderer
that's because "murder" is a verb

"polyamory" is a noun, it describes a state of (individual or communal) being
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85155
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by epilogue »

Rob wrote:Wouldn't most of us be naturally inclined toward a polyamorous lifestyle, but then many of us commit to one person for a variety of reasons (and of course it's fine if you choose not to)?
I have no research or data to support my opinion, but I think you're probably right. I will say that I have always tended toward and preferred monogamy, however. I am not naturally inclined toward polyamory. Though I certainly have zero judgement about it. Just my own personal taste.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:Also, if you don't naturally have the urge to murder people, but somehow through some glitch in the matrix you find yourself having murdered somebody, you're still a murderer
that's because "murder" is a verb

"polyamory" is a noun, it describes a state of (individual or communal) being
It only comes to be as a status once an act has been executed. A desire to do something does make a person one who does the thing. Murderer is a noun.
Last edited by tree_ on Wed March 30, 2022 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85155
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by epilogue »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Rob wrote:Wouldn't most of us be naturally inclined toward a polyamorous lifestyle, but then many of us commit to one person for a variety of reasons (and of course it's fine if you choose not to)?
yeah, I think that's correct

I think it's far more likely that modern society and culture imposed monogamy on people than the other way around; it's certainly not the default setting in the animal kingdom (though it exists, obvs)
Well said.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:Also, if you don't naturally have the urge to murder people, but somehow through some glitch in the matrix you find yourself having murdered somebody, you're still a murderer
that's because "murder" is a verb

"polyamory" is a noun, it describes a state of (individual or communal) being
It only comes to be as a status once an act has been executed. A desire to do something does make a person one who does the thing. Murderer is a noun.
it's not even "the desire to do a thing"

you don't have to DO anything to be gay, and you don't have to DO anything to be polyamorous
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:Also, if you don't naturally have the urge to murder people, but somehow through some glitch in the matrix you find yourself having murdered somebody, you're still a murderer
that's because "murder" is a verb

"polyamory" is a noun, it describes a state of (individual or communal) being
It only comes to be as a status once an act has been executed. A desire to do something does make a person one who does the thing. Murderer is a noun.
it's not even "the desire to do a thing"

you don't have to DO anything to be gay, and you don't have to DO anything to be polyamorous
Being gay does not require an act; it is an orientation of sexual attraction. Polyamory by definition is a practice.
Post Reply