tree_ wrote:pol·y·am·o·ry
/ˌpälēˈamərē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the practice of engaging in multiple romantic (and typically sexual) relationships, with the consent of all the people involved.
po·lyg·a·mous
/pəˈliɡəməs/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
practicing, relating to, or involving polygamy.
Are you not not going to watch the Oscars this year?
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I may never stop laughingMickey wrote:I hate to say it but this thread needs to read some Foucault
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Oh, so you agree with the definitions. OK then.Ms Harmless wrote:tree_ wrote:pol·y·am·o·ry
/ˌpälēˈamərē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the practice of engaging in multiple romantic (and typically sexual) relationships, with the consent of all the people involved.
po·lyg·a·mous
/pəˈliɡəməs/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
practicing, relating to, or involving polygamy.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
it won't let me paste the Wiki link for some reason but it describes polyamory as "the practice of, or the desire for"tree_ wrote:pol·y·am·o·ry
/ˌpälēˈamərē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the practice of engaging in multiple romantic (and typically sexual) relationships, with the consent of all the people involved.
po·lyg·a·mous
/pəˈliɡəməs/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
practicing, relating to, or involving polygamy.
and polygamy is not the same thing as polyamory
other than that, we can throw definitions at each other all night that say different things and support our own thinking; ultimately people can and should define these things for themselves, if it matters to them
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I pressed return accidentallytree_ wrote:Oh, so you agree with the definitions. OK then.Ms Harmless wrote:tree_ wrote:pol·y·am·o·ry
/ˌpälēˈamərē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the practice of engaging in multiple romantic (and typically sexual) relationships, with the consent of all the people involved.
po·lyg·a·mous
/pəˈliɡəməs/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
practicing, relating to, or involving polygamy.
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23547
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
Jorge wrote:
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I guess I think the "desire or inclination to be polygamous" is actually different from "being polygamous"
otherwise, all of us who can't constantly control our thoughts and impulses possess all sorts of statuses we don't actually own up to, such as "murderer", because we've wanted to kill someone at least once
otherwise, all of us who can't constantly control our thoughts and impulses possess all sorts of statuses we don't actually own up to, such as "murderer", because we've wanted to kill someone at least once
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
if that's how you wished to identify, sure, unless you think that desire was innately wrong (the act would be without the consent of your wife, but want whatever you want)tree_ wrote:So you're saying I'm polyamorous because I've had the desire to have sexual intercourse with another person while married, whether or not I've acted upon this desire?Ms Harmless wrote:OK yeah, that's true; you're a murderer if you've done a murderJorge wrote:I just want to say that murder is also a noun
I'm just saying you're not polyamorous because you've done a polyamor
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
so then it becomes about which impulses and instincts are morally OK and which ones aren'ttree_ wrote:I guess I think the "desire or inclination to be polygamous" is actually different from "being polygamous"
otherwise, all of us who can't constantly control our thoughts and impulses possess all sorts of statuses we don't actually own up to, such as "murderer", because we've wanted to kill someone at least once
- Rob
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2889
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I thought consent was part of the polyamorous lifestyle.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
polyamorous is not "polygamous"
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I don’t think there’s anything innately wrong about polygamy, but it would break the contract of our marriage and what we agreed upon, Therefore I choose not to be polygamousMs Harmless wrote:if that's how you wished to identify, sure, unless you think that desire was innately wrong (the act would be without the consent of your wife, but want whatever you want)tree_ wrote:So you're saying I'm polyamorous because I've had the desire to have sexual intercourse with another person while married, whether or not I've acted upon this desire?Ms Harmless wrote:OK yeah, that's true; you're a murderer if you've done a murderJorge wrote:I just want to say that murder is also a noun
I'm just saying you're not polyamorous because you've done a polyamor
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
it isRob wrote:I thought consent was part of the polyamorous lifestyle.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
No I’m just trying to figure out which words are correct hereMs Harmless wrote:so then it becomes about which impulses and instincts are morally OK and which ones aren'ttree_ wrote:I guess I think the "desire or inclination to be polygamous" is actually different from "being polygamous"
otherwise, all of us who can't constantly control our thoughts and impulses possess all sorts of statuses we don't actually own up to, such as "murderer", because we've wanted to kill someone at least once
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
that's perfectly finetree_ wrote:I don’t think there’s anything innately wrong about polygamy, but it would break the contract of our marriage and what we agreed upon, Therefore I choose not to be polygamousMs Harmless wrote:if that's how you wished to identify, sure, unless you think that desire was innately wrong (the act would be without the consent of your wife, but want whatever you want)tree_ wrote:So you're saying I'm polyamorous because I've had the desire to have sexual intercourse with another person while married, whether or not I've acted upon this desire?Ms Harmless wrote:OK yeah, that's true; you're a murderer if you've done a murderJorge wrote:I just want to say that murder is also a noun
I'm just saying you're not polyamorous because you've done a polyamor
when I was married, my ex wife came out to me as polyamorous, so we opened up and lived as such openly, there was no cheating; I don't know what she's doing now but I've not gone back to thinking monogamy is good for me
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
sure, fair enoughtree_ wrote:No I’m just trying to figure out which words are correct hereMs Harmless wrote:so then it becomes about which impulses and instincts are morally OK and which ones aren'ttree_ wrote:I guess I think the "desire or inclination to be polygamous" is actually different from "being polygamous"
otherwise, all of us who can't constantly control our thoughts and impulses possess all sorts of statuses we don't actually own up to, such as "murderer", because we've wanted to kill someone at least once
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
So, are you telling me that I could identify as a murderer without ever actually attempting to murder anyone?
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
I meant: "the act would be wrong without the consent of your wife, but want what you want, and if you want it enough, talk about it with your wife"Ms Harmless wrote:it isRob wrote:I thought consent was part of the polyamorous lifestyle.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
You know, it's interesting... I say that I'm monogamous. And I believe that. But.... if my wife came to me tomorrow and said that she wanted to be polyamorous, or that she'd found a partner who could give her something she felt she couldn't get from me, I would actually be open to the idea of her having multiple partners. There are obviously a ton of caveats here and considerations. But I'm not out-of-the-box opposed to it. And we've talked about this out loud. So... This is a fascinating conversation to me.
I would not want to lose my wife on that basis. This is all so complicated. And really interesting to me. And just goes to show how much societal pressures affect us even when we think they don't.
I would not want to lose my wife on that basis. This is all so complicated. And really interesting to me. And just goes to show how much societal pressures affect us even when we think they don't.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?
that's an interesting question given the number of people who'd say someone with a criminal desire should already be condemned as a criminaltree_ wrote:So, are you telling me that I could identify as a murderer without ever actually attempting to murder anyone?
but in any case, again, is it OK to murder? no
is it OK to "go outside a monogamous relationship"? potentially, yes, let's talk about it baby
Last edited by Ms Harmless on Wed March 30, 2022 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.