Antiquiet Tweet

broken iris · Post by **broken iris** » Wed January 30, 2013 11:00 am

I am kinda glad this came up. We were running out of insignificant things to complain about.

Angus · Post by **Angus** » Wed January 30, 2013 12:59 pm

So that Boston (+ a limited number of extra cities) tour was fake?

Wed January 30, 2013 1:06 pm

Angus wrote:So that Boston (+ a limited number of extra cities) tour was fake?

it appears so, but the real list of tour stops wont be that much different im sure

bodysnatcher · Post by **bodysnatcher** » Wed January 30, 2013 6:40 pm

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Angus wrote:So that Boston (+ a limited number of extra cities) tour was fake?
it appears so, but the real list of tour stops wont be that much different im sure

Boston, NYC, Philly, Wash DC, Hartford (maybe), Chicago, Los Angeles

oblivious · Post by **oblivious** » Wed January 30, 2013 8:47 pm

maybe it's new album news

Wed January 30, 2013 9:09 pm

oblivious wrote:maybe it's new album news

already came out yesterday, it was just some old Ed demos from around 89 or so.

Fuck You Jobu · Post by **Fuck You Jobu** » Wed January 30, 2013 9:12 pm

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
oblivious wrote:maybe it's new album news
already came out yesterday, it was just some old Ed demos from around 89 or so.

Post by **Jorge** » Wed January 30, 2013 9:14 pm

oblivious and obliviouser

Wed January 30, 2013 9:23 pm

theplatypus wrote:oblivious and obliviouser

Fuck You Jobu · Post by **Fuck You Jobu** » Wed January 30, 2013 9:26 pm

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
theplatypus wrote:oblivious and obliviouser

Fuzzcharger · Post by **Fuzzcharger** » Wed January 30, 2013 9:37 pm

Champagne RM.

Birds in Hell · Post by **Birds in Hell** » Wed January 30, 2013 10:09 pm

Fuzzcharger wrote:Champagne RM.

Norah · Post by **Norah** » Wed January 30, 2013 10:10 pm

for everyone!

Angus · Post by **Angus** » Wed January 30, 2013 10:16 pm

Fuzzcharger wrote:Champagne RM.

I thought it was Champaign IL.

Got Some · Post by **Got Some** » Thu January 31, 2013 11:21 am

I'm waiting to read stips review before I make my decision on whether to check out these songs.

Post by **stip** » Thu January 31, 2013 12:03 pm

in all seriousness if you never heard these before they are an interesting listen. And there are one or two that I wold have liked to see PJ pick up besides betterman. But mostly it is of historical value.

Still, if I had never heard this stuff before I think this would have been worthy of all the hype Antiquiet gave it. It's just that unless something is genuinely knew, rather than old and rareish, it'll be hard to surprise enough people to justify the hyperbole.

Blenheim Augustine · Thu January 31, 2013 1:04 pm

stip wrote:in all seriousness if you never heard these before they are an interesting listen. And there are one or two that I wold have liked to see PJ pick up besides betterman. But mostly it is of historical value.

Still, if I had never heard this stuff before I think this would have been worthy of all the hype Antiquiet gave it. It's just that unless something is genuinely knew, rather than old and rareish, it'll be hard to surprise enough people to justify the hyperbole.

The problem was that most people who are going to care about new Pearl Jam in 2013 are likely to have heard these (apart from the people that have been retweeted by AQ). If it hadn't been three decades since they last produced an album I doubt it would have produced such a the rabid piranha frenzy that it did. Antiquiet should understand that.

People are always going to be much more aggressive online than they are in real life since people usually type the thoughts that are in their head rather than what they would actually say outloud.

Post by **stip** » Thu January 31, 2013 6:25 pm

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
stip wrote:in all seriousness if you never heard these before they are an interesting listen. And there are one or two that I wold have liked to see PJ pick up besides betterman. But mostly it is of historical value.

Still, if I had never heard this stuff before I think this would have been worthy of all the hype Antiquiet gave it. It's just that unless something is genuinely knew, rather than old and rareish, it'll be hard to surprise enough people to justify the hyperbole.
The problem was that most people who are going to care about new Pearl Jam in 2013 are likely to have heard these (apart from the people that have been retweeted by AQ). If it hadn't been three decades since they last produced an album I doubt it would have produced such a the rabid piranha frenzy that it did. Antiquiet should understand that.

that's true.

Rat · Post by **Rat** » Fri February 01, 2013 4:21 am

Listening to Ed's songs in good quality was nice, a first for me. I've heard the songs for years of course. Homeless and BYM are good tunes. It got me thinking... What percentage chance do you think Eddie would have been able to make a humble living on music if not for Mike and Stone. And vice versa, what percentage chance would have Stone had if not for Ed? And Jeff? Mike? Dave Krusen? Who had the best shot?

Birds in Hell · Post by **Birds in Hell** » Fri February 01, 2013 4:28 am

I imagine Jeff and Stone would've been fine if not for Pearl Jam, though not as hugely successful.

Mike would totally be a weekend blues lawyer.

Ed, who knows.

Red Mosquito

Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Re: Antiquiet Tweet