you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
The Supreme Court
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Supreme Court
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazyspike wrote:you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
Dick/Balls
- macphisto
- Gone
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 am
- Location: August 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: The Supreme Court
Do you have a 20.0 bumper sticker?
Dev wrote:You're whole platform is about normalizing idiocy.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Supreme Court
That only burned your calories.verb_to_trust wrote:Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazyspike wrote:you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
At least I don't have to wear a manzierspike wrote:That only burned your calories.verb_to_trust wrote:Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazyspike wrote:you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
Dick/Balls
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: The Supreme Court
The Colombian group M-19 had some good ideas.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I hope the FEMEN deployment is limited to DC.BurtReynolds wrote:Things are about to get mostly peaceful.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Supreme Court
You gotta stop obsessing over JB too.verb_to_trust wrote:At least I don't have to wear a manzierspike wrote:That only burned your calories.verb_to_trust wrote:Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazyspike wrote:you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
Who?spike wrote:You gotta stop obsessing over JB too.verb_to_trust wrote:At least I don't have to wear a manzierspike wrote:That only burned your calories.verb_to_trust wrote:Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazyspike wrote:you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
Dick/Balls
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I thought Shining Path was more your style.Mickey wrote:The Colombian group M-19 had some good ideas.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Demar Derozanverb_to_trust wrote:Who?spike wrote:You gotta stop obsessing over JB too.verb_to_trust wrote:At least I don't have to wear a manzierspike wrote:That only burned your calories.verb_to_trust wrote:Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazyspike wrote:you're so lazyverb_to_trust wrote:I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.spike wrote:fucking finallyverb_to_trust wrote:I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.spike wrote:cuz that's all it's aboutverb_to_trust wrote:I don't give a fuck about kidsE.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 3:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 3:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Sounds like wishful thinking.tragabigzanda wrote:GOP ploy to gauge impacts to the midterms4/5 wrote:Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25047
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Breyer burning the place down on his way out.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Upholding the law would not be dissenting, it would be concurring in the judgment.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Judging by the reaction I'm reading over the last half day, I seem to be far less interested about this than most other people are.4/5 wrote:Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Given two options….tragabigzanda wrote:GOP ploy to gauge impacts to the midterms4/5 wrote:Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
1. A week of click-hungry press headlines building up the anticipation of a major incoming abortion decision, putting increased public attention on it right before an explosive announcement.
…or…
2. A sudden late Monday leak when nobody is expecting it, which noises up the conversation with the type of pearl clutching decorum debate that pundits, politicians, and others can pivot to instead of talking about the actual erosion of rights and the real world ramifications of that erosion for actual people.
…I’d take the latter if I was a conservative coming for Roe. Bonuses are that people will default to suspecting the other team, conservative media has a grievance angle, and states can start writing anticipatory bans that go into effect asap. It puts that much more time between the announcement and the next vote. A leak is kind of the best case scenario for Republicans.
The idea that this court will be pressured into changing its mind by public response seems naive to me.
(patriotic choking noises)