What movies are you watching?

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

Waiting til it hits theaters here in a couple weeks. I wanna see it on the big screen
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

tree_ wrote:
Jorge wrote:
JuanHamm wrote:
50 Million Feet of Earth... wrote:
wease wrote:
Anders wrote:Kill Bill Volume One.

Finished with 2003 now, moving on to 2004.
I’ve still never seen the second one. And I even own it.
I saw part 2 in the theater and bought it when it first came out on DVD. It's still in the shrinkwrap.

I saw both of them a few times when they first came out, but I haven't watched either in years

They're on the list of movies that I'm not sure if I would like any more, so I don't watch them.
I used to like Vol 2 better because it was more dialogue-heavy and "cerebral," but then I watched both again somewhat recently and Vol 1 is far and away the better movie
I've always felt this way... So my brain works faster than yours, I guess
I don’t understand this… it’s all one movie, shot at the same time. I do remember a few scenes in part one that I thought were great, but there’s not really a difference in the two.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

It was written and produced as one movie, yeah. That doesn't mean it's actually one movie. It was released as two movies.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

And yes, of course there are differences? What the hell?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85221
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by epilogue »

Vol 1 is gorgeous. Vol 2 is completely stupid. There is a lot more dialogue. But most of that dialogue is legit terrible.

I don't really care for either volume. But I fucking hate Vol. 2.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

Jorge wrote:It was written and produced as one movie, yeah. That doesn't mean it's actually one movie. It was released as two movies.
My understanding is that it’s one movie, split in two so that it wasn’t too long for theaters and this way scenes didn’t have to be cut. Maybe you just like the 2nd half of the movie better?
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

Quite possible I just see things differently. Like when people say they liked the first Matrix but not the rest. To me, you liked part one. It’s just one story that people won’t sit for 6 hours to see at once, but still just one really long movie.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Mickey »

That is not true lmao
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Mickey »

The Matrix is a self contained film. The Matrix Reloaded is a sequel.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Mickey »

I admit this gets hazy with movies like Kill Bill or Dune but the concept of sequel is pretty straightforward.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

Rob wrote:
Jorge wrote:It was written and produced as one movie, yeah. That doesn't mean it's actually one movie. It was released as two movies.
My understanding is that it’s one movie, split in two so that it wasn’t too long for theaters and this way scenes didn’t have to be cut. Maybe you just like the 2nd half of the movie better?
I see what you're saying but yeah, to me it's two movies even if it's one story. The second half is more subdued and dialogue heavy, while the first half is more colorful and kinetic. That's just how it worked out after they made the decision to split it in two
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

Mickey wrote:The Matrix is a self contained film. The Matrix Reloaded is a sequel.
Ok, you’re right. But what I mean is that it seems clear with the matrix that there’s a story that needs a trilogy to tell, rather than a movie. All 3 flow (part 4 is something else) and I really don’t believe any one of them can stand alone without the others.

Kill Bill is one movie. They split it in two because no one is gonna go see a 4 hour movie. I remember when it came out and people were commenting on it.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

There are 4 hour long movies. There's even a 16 hour long movie, which I watched! Tarantino & co made the commercial decision to release Kill Bill as two movies
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

Jorge wrote:
Rob wrote:
Jorge wrote:It was written and produced as one movie, yeah. That doesn't mean it's actually one movie. It was released as two movies.
My understanding is that it’s one movie, split in two so that it wasn’t too long for theaters and this way scenes didn’t have to be cut. Maybe you just like the 2nd half of the movie better?
I see what you're saying but yeah, to me it's two movies even if it's one story. The second half is more subdued and dialogue heavy, while the first half is more colorful and kinetic. That's just how it worked out after they made the decision to split it in two
For what it’s worth I do remember liking part one better.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

Jorge wrote:There are 4 hour long movies. There's even a 16 hour long movie, which I watched! Tarantino & co made the commercial decision to release Kill Bill as two movies
Yea but there’s not many 4-16 hour movies that do well at the box office (at a time when movie theater sales were decent). It made financial sense to split it (or cut scenes).
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

Yep, and the trade-off is that you end up with two movies instead of one
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Rob »

Jorge wrote:Yep, and the trade-off is that you end up with two movies instead of one
Technically yes, in reality it’s two halves. :)
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36829
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by Jorge »

We're gonna do this forever
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43518
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by VinylGuy »

epilogue wrote:Vol 1 is gorgeous. Vol 2 is completely stupid. There is a lot more dialogue. But most of that dialogue is legit terrible.

I don't really care for either volume. But I fucking hate Vol. 2.
omg
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11959
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: What movies are you watching?

Post by The Argonaut »

Tarantino only counts it as one movie
Please consider voting for me
Post Reply