Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate Lost Dogs

5 Stars: As good as any of the records
19
25%
4 Stars: really strong
44
58%
3 Stars: average
10
13%
2 Stars: Meh
3
4%
1 Star: sucks
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 76

User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Farmer John »

Listen to how much better this is than the version on Lost Dogs

dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by dad »

Farmer John wrote:Listen to how much better this is than the version on Lost Dogs

Superior to the re-recorded version by a country mile it’s not even close, to infinity and beyond over and over hallelujah amen.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

i do love how ed change the meaning of the song on the re recorded version from a love song to the exact opposite.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

That song sucks no matter what version it is.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Farmer John »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:That song sucks no matter what version it is.
It's no Leatherman, that's for sure.
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Jaeti »

Always liked it, always will like it.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

tragabigzanda wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:i do love how ed change the meaning of the song on the re recorded version from a love song to the exact opposite.
??? Did he actually change some lyrics?
yeah, he made it a breakup song. Its brilliant.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:i do love how ed change the meaning of the song on the re recorded version from a love song to the exact opposite.
??? Did he actually change some lyrics?
Yep. It's like two or three very small changes that alter the song.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

For example on the original b-side: "I don't think it's easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

Clearly a very romantic sentiment. Love isn't easy except that you make it easy.

On Lost Dogs it becomes: "I thought it was easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

The exact opposite sentiment. Love is easy except you make it impossible.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Jorge »

Yeah that's what he sings on that video

I like the original because it's a little messier IIRC
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
epilogue wrote:For example on the original b-side: "I don't think it's easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

Clearly a very romantic sentiment. Love isn't easy except that you make it easy.

On Lost Dogs it becomes: "I thought it was easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

The exact opposite sentiment. Love is easy except you make it impossible.
Doesn't he say that in the opening line of the original version posted above?
Sorry, it's the one at the end: "I don't think it's easy to stay in love" vs "I think it's easy to stay in love" on LD.

It's been a long time since I listened.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

epilogue wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
epilogue wrote:For example on the original b-side: "I don't think it's easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

Clearly a very romantic sentiment. Love isn't easy except that you make it easy.

On Lost Dogs it becomes: "I thought it was easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

The exact opposite sentiment. Love is easy except you make it impossible.
Doesn't he say that in the opening line of the original version posted above?
Sorry, it's the one at the end: "I don't think it's easy to stay in love" vs "I think it's easy to stay in love" on LD.

It's been a long time since I listened.
NICE TYPO DUDE
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
epilogue wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
epilogue wrote:For example on the original b-side: "I don't think it's easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

Clearly a very romantic sentiment. Love isn't easy except that you make it easy.

On Lost Dogs it becomes: "I thought it was easy to fall in love but you, you, you."

The exact opposite sentiment. Love is easy except you make it impossible.
Doesn't he say that in the opening line of the original version posted above?
Sorry, it's the one at the end: "I don't think it's easy to stay in love" vs "I think it's easy to stay in love" on LD.

It's been a long time since I listened.
NICE TYPO DUDE
:lol:
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by dad »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:That song sucks no matter what version it is.
rude.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
joostone
AnalLog
Posts: 1779
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:02 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by joostone »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:That song sucks no matter what version it is.
still better than half of earthling....
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Leatherhead »

joostone wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:That song sucks no matter what version it is.
still better than half of earthling....
Yes.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

id rather listen to Ole
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

stip wrote:id rather listen to Ole
Ole is awesome. But U is probably better.
Post Reply