America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?

[simple schoolboy]

Also, that video is pretty stupid, Cricket. Though I'm sure you're super proud of it and believe it speaks for you since you continue to fail to speak for yourself.

1) No one here (that I remember) is calling for a ban on all guns. Even the headline cited specifically refers to assault weapons.
2) Then it gets itself confused by mentioning psyops/mk ultra which is evidence (in my opinion) of tyrannical government already existing. Which means a proliferation of guns isn't stopping American tyranny... you're number one reason for having them, Cricket.
3) I'm pretty sure it steals a family guy joke. Lazy.
4) It's transphobic
5) It then wonders why governments need guns too? Cool question.
6) It then lists only examples of gun bans (of which we're not calling for) that soon after led to despotism. Why not reference those examples that exist where that didn't happen?
7) SLIPPERY SLOPE! AAAAAAAaaaaahhhhhh!

Like I said. Stupid, Cricket. Be best!

Are we just revamping the old assault weapons ban? Congrats on banning certain features and models.

To be "effective" you'd need to ban all semi automatic weapon. Is that what we are discussing?

Pump action (or bolt action?) non semiautomatic AR-15s exist.

So long as firearms are defined as they are currently, the modular types where the 'firearm' part is defined as some bit with the serial number, you can reconfigure them with the non serialized parts to whatever you like.

It's like banning Millennium Falcon Lego kits but allowing all the relevant bricks to be sold individually. You'd have to amend the NFA to redefine what a firearm is.

[elliseamos]

Also, that video is pretty stupid, Cricket. Though I'm sure you're super proud of it and believe it speaks for you since you continue to fail to speak for yourself.

1) No one here (that I remember) is calling for a ban on all guns. Even the headline cited specifically refers to assault weapons.
2) Then it gets itself confused by mentioning psyops/mk ultra which is evidence (in my opinion) of tyrannical government already existing. Which means a proliferation of guns isn't stopping American tyranny... you're number one reason for having them, Cricket.
3) I'm pretty sure it steals a family guy joke. Lazy.
4) It's transphobic
5) It then wonders why governments need guns too? Cool question.
6) It then lists only examples of gun bans (of which we're not calling for) that soon after led to despotism. Why not reference those examples that exist where that didn't happen?
7) SLIPPERY SLOPE! AAAAAAAaaaaahhhhhh!

Like I said. Stupid, Cricket. Be best!

Are we just revamping the old assault weapons ban? Congrats on banning certain features and models.

To be "effective" you'd need to ban all semi automatic weapon. Is that what we are discussing?

Pump action (or bolt action?) non semiautomatic AR-15s exist.

So long as firearms are defined as they are currently, the modular types where the 'firearm' part is defined as some bit with the serial number, you can reconfigure them with the non serialized parts to whatever you like.

It's like banning Millennium Falcon Lego kits but allowing all the relevant bricks to be sold individually. You'd have to amend the NFA to redefine what a firearm is.

Ok.

[verb_to_trust]

Also, that video is pretty stupid, Cricket. Though I'm sure you're super proud of it and believe it speaks for you since you continue to fail to speak for yourself.

1) No one here (that I remember) is calling for a ban on all guns. Even the headline cited specifically refers to assault weapons.
2) Then it gets itself confused by mentioning psyops/mk ultra which is evidence (in my opinion) of tyrannical government already existing. Which means a proliferation of guns isn't stopping American tyranny... you're number one reason for having them, Cricket.
3) I'm pretty sure it steals a family guy joke. Lazy.
4) It's transphobic
5) It then wonders why governments need guns too? Cool question.
6) It then lists only examples of gun bans (of which we're not calling for) that soon after led to despotism. Why not reference those examples that exist where that didn't happen?
7) SLIPPERY SLOPE! AAAAAAAaaaaahhhhhh!

Like I said. Stupid, Cricket. Be best!

Are we just revamping the old assault weapons ban? Congrats on banning certain features and models.

To be "effective" you'd need to ban all semi automatic weapon. Is that what we are discussing?

Pump action (or bolt action?) non semiautomatic AR-15s exist.

So long as firearms are defined as they are currently, the modular types where the 'firearm' part is defined as some bit with the serial number, you can reconfigure them with the non serialized parts to whatever you like.

It's like banning Millennium Falcon Lego kits but allowing all the relevant bricks to be sold individually. You'd have to amend the NFA to redefine what a firearm is.

Ok.

Crickets

[elliseamos]

I've explained that I don't care if it's complicated. Many times.

Also, just because there's a lot of words there and short reply doesn't mean we even disagree or that ai answered insufficiently.

"You'd have to amend the NFA to redefine what a firearm is."

"Ok"

That's still not me calling for a ban on all guns.

[Peeps]

[Bi_3]

"The crime scene that is American soil"


LOL,these fuckers just cannot help themselves.

[elliseamos]

Insert *Joe Pesci I'm done with this guy* gif

[Bi_3]

Insert *Joe Pesci I'm done with this guy* gif

Just once, while there is still a little momentum, can we just focus on a single issue and do something about guns without all of that other progressive bullshit that turns off 2/3 of the country? This one time not make it "disagree and you're racist". Just once, can we take the win and make the country better for everyone? Please.

[simple schoolboy]

I've explained that I don't care if it's complicated. Many times.

Also, just because there's a lot of words there and short reply doesn't mean we even disagree or that ai answered insufficiently.

"You'd have to amend the NFA to redefine what a firearm is."

"Ok"

That's still not me calling for a ban on all guns.

Is that what is proposed? I don't think they are attempting any of what I laid out, so what are they doing?

Have measures that annoy and inconvenience gun owners without making a dent. Are they trying to reduce "gun violence" or underlining that the outgroup is icky?

[Stickman]

Gonna be a helluva summer in the good ol USA

A string of mass shootings across the U.S. left at least 15 people dead and more than 60 injured over the weekend of June 4-5, according to the Gun Violence Archive, a group that tracks mass shootings.

In Philadelphia, PA, on Saturday night, 3 were killed and 12 injured after multiple shooters fired into a crowd in a popular nightlife area on South Street, according to the AP.

Early Sunday in Chattanooga, TN, 3 were killed and 14 injured near a nightclub, according to local police.

Similar incidents were also registered in several other states, such as Arizona and Georgia. Shootings traditionally begin to increase during the summer, but the bloodshed this weekend is especially notable given that it comes as the country is still reeling from the massacres in Buffalo, Uvalde, and Tulsa.

[verb_to_trust]

Thanks for all you do Stickman!

[blueviper]

Stickman is just proving a point. We have a gun issue.

[BurtReynolds]

He cares a lot about us.

[verb_to_trust]

Stickman is just proving a point. We have a gun issue.

We couldn't have done it without him!

[wease]

Thanks for all you do Stickman!

Why are you being such a dick about it? Just because you don’t believe there is gun violence that doesn’t mean it doesn’t occur. I’m glad you can be so flippant about it.

[spike]

Thanks for all you do Stickman!

Why are you being such a dick about it? Just because you don’t believe there is gun violence that doesn’t mean it doesn’t occur. I’m glad you can be so flippant about it.

Anything for a little attention.

[verb_to_trust]

Thanks for all you do Stickman!

Why are you being such a dick about it? Just because you don’t believe there is gun violence that doesn’t mean it doesn’t occur. I’m glad you can be so flippant about it.

It's funny you take issue with me instead of the Canadian news aggregator with the creepy fixation/inferiority complex re: everything USA.

Don't be such an Atomic Punk

[wease]

Thanks for all you do Stickman!

Why are you being such a dick about it? Just because you don’t believe there is gun violence that doesn’t mean it doesn’t occur. I’m glad you can be so flippant about it.

It's funny you take issue with me instead of the Canadian news aggregator with the creepy fixation/inferiority complex re: everything USA.

Don't be such an Atomic Punk

Stop being a douche

[verb_to_trust]

Thanks for all you do Stickman!

Why are you being such a dick about it? Just because you don’t believe there is gun violence that doesn’t mean it doesn’t occur. I’m glad you can be so flippant about it.

It's funny you take issue with me instead of the Canadian news aggregator with the creepy fixation/inferiority complex re: everything USA.

Don't be such an Atomic Punk

Stop being a douche

Was that on Van Halen III?

[elliseamos]

I've explained that I don't care if it's complicated. Many times.

Also, just because there's a lot of words there and short reply doesn't mean we even disagree or that ai answered insufficiently.

"You'd have to amend the NFA to redefine what a firearm is."

"Ok"

That's still not me calling for a ban on all guns.

Is that what is proposed? I don't think they are attempting any of what I laid out, so what are they doing?

Have measures that annoy and inconvenience gun owners without making a dent. Are they trying to reduce "gun violence" or underlining that the outgroup is icky?

I have no idea what's proposed. But I don't disagree with any of this.

What you replied to was my recap of Crickets stupid video.

Insert *Joe Pesci I'm done with this guy* gif

Just once, while there is still a little momentum, can we just focus on a single issue and do something about guns without all of that other progressive bullshit that turns off 2/3 of the country? This one time not make it "disagree and you're racist". Just once, can we take the win and make the country better for everyone? Please.

yes we can!