TV: Stranger Things

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Anders »

An hour left of the second last episode now. Then two and a half hours on the last episode to go.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Anders »

Starting the final episode now, but won’t finish today. Two hours and thirty minutes long. Crazy.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Anders »

Will finish tomorrow. Decent final episode so far, but this show could be half as long.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by wease »

Anders wrote:Will finish tomorrow. Decent final episode so far, but this show could be half as long.
It could be twice as long, too.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2887
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Rob »

I wouldn’t change anything but if I had to, it would not be making it shorter.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Mecca »

I would’ve made it shorter
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Anders »

Kind of looking forward to this ending today.
User avatar
lvc
Huge WNBA Fan
Posts: 968
Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by lvc »

Season 5 is around the corner. I just started season one with my oldest kid and he's digging it. Reading back through this thread, I'm reminded of one thing: Season 4 was completely incredible...


... for how high on the smell of their own shit the Duffer bros became. Tight writing is what made this show work at the beginning. I can't believe that these guys haven't read Stephen King enough to have the truism "kill your darlings" completely engraved on their subconscious. Season 1 was 8 episodes and like six and a half hours. Same with 2 and 3. Season 4 was 9 episodes and 13 hours and I felt that pacing every slogging step of the way. And it looks like season 5 will make the same mistake. These guys do not have the writing chops to demand that much attention, the acting talent of the cast is too unevenly distributed to sustain interest.

The whole Stranger Things phenomenon is a master class is letting success go to your head.
User avatar
lvc
Huge WNBA Fan
Posts: 968
Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by lvc »

Just did some googling. By the time Season 5 is over, Stranger things will have stretched itself out (maybe 48-50 hours) over nearly as much time as Breaking Bad (56 hours) and pretty much the same time as the entire Infinity Saga (50 hours). The amount of storytelling the Duffer brothers accomplish in that enormous amount of time is laughable by comparison.

I think this might be the greatest weakness of "TV" shows made by streaming services. The hour or half-hour constraints of traditional TV formatting forced writers to be concise and focused. The drawback was that 24 season orders led to some duds mixed in to even really good shows. AMC kind of solved that by shortening seasons to 16 episodes, often in 8-episode blocks. So you got a lot of really good long-form TV because you got the best combination of constraints. Every episode short enough to be a "leave them wanting more" scenario, especially the more invested viewers became in the story arc. 50 minutes of story time felt too short, but it was actually just right. And 8 or 16 episode blocks

Streaming throws that all out the window and you get episodes, episodes of a "TV" show that last longer than many feature-length movies. The whole pacing and rhythm is just tanked. You slog through an entire movie's worth of film but minus the payoff or closure you get at the end of a movie.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by E.H. Ruddock »



Feels like it has been 5 years since the last season.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by VinylGuy »

not five but three
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by wease »

This is still a thing? I’d totally forgotten about it.

Surely there will be some sort of time jump. These kids don’t even look like kids anymore.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Mecca »

wease wrote:This is still a thing? I’d totally forgotten about it.

Surely there will be some sort of time jump. These kids don’t even look like kids anymore.
Linda Hamilton was 10 when the series first aired and now look at her
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by bart »

I watched the first season of this back when it came out and enjoyed it but never got around to watching any of the other seasons. Recently I rewatched that season and still liked it a lot, so I moved on to season 2 and liked everything but the idiotic sister plot. Now I’m on the third episode of season 3 and it’s god awful, just a chore to get through. Does it get better? I’m tempted to just skip to the end and move on to season 4.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by VinylGuy »

season 3 happened like ten years ago buddy i cant remember anything about it
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by bart »

VinylGuy wrote:season 3 happened like ten years ago buddy i cant remember anything about it
Thank you for posting!
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by VinylGuy »

bart wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:season 3 happened like ten years ago buddy i cant remember anything about it
Thank you for posting!
you welcome
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Ensign9
Future Drummer
Posts: 2271
Joined: Sat January 12, 2013 7:19 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Ensign9 »

First episode down. I love how every footstep, look, and setting down of a notebook sounds like a cannon going off.
deep substrate foliated kalkite
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Mecca »

Episode 3
Spoiler: show
Erica is kind of a psychopath with that needle
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by blueviper »

Watched first episode of season 5. Kinda ho hum. Feels like a pastiche of itself. The dialog seems more cringey than usual.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
Post Reply