The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bi_3 »

daft twat wrote:
psychobain wrote:
daft twat wrote:or why Tolkien purists are upset
Black elf
It really does suck when a black elf takes a deserving white elf’s job.
I think it was when the white elf decided to lecture him that he (in particular) had to watch over these folks in the "Southlands" because of the "evil things men did in the past".
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by JuanHamm »

Bi_3 wrote:
daft twat wrote:
psychobain wrote:
daft twat wrote:or why Tolkien purists are upset
Black elf
It really does suck when a black elf takes a deserving white elf’s job.
I think it was when the white elf decided to lecture him that he (in particular) had to watch over these folks in the "Southlands" because of the "evil things men did in the past".

lol

It's a shame that some people can't just enjoy something without projecting their shitty politics onto it.
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Nb Tolkien purists aren’t upset about the diversity in the cast.

Racists are upset about the diversity in the cast. That’s all


And Elon musk. Who the ever living fuck cares what he thinks of the show??
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by McParadigm »

Well, my wife wanted to check it out so I ended up watching the first two episodes with her.

Mostly, I just wish they had learned the lesson of Fellowship (or A New Hope): start small, with characters who can be your stand-ins as the story evolves. Characters for whom much of what is to come will be as new, or confusing, or surprising, or tensely dramatic as it will be for you the viewer. Then slowly build the rest of your cast around that.

Starting with just Nori and Arondir would have been so much better than this. The harfoot story is about the intrusion of a changing world on peaceful and comfortable tranquility. The elf’s story covers the politics of the elves’ current situation and their terse relationship to middle earth, without the drag of walking and talking and walking and talking. It also introduces the return of evil in a much tighter and more “on the ground,” urgent manner than all of that Galadriel stuff.

Galadriel and Elrond just feel like characters we should be meeting along the way, because they are already in some way equipped to respond to these unfolding challenges and their root starting points just aren’t that interesting. Also, bringing them in as the story evolves would’ve protected us from that stupid (and oddly cheap looking) ocean sequence. That raft looked like it needed a rope bridge leading back to the rest of the Great Wolf Lodge.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by McParadigm »

Anyways, Galadriel playing badass on a cgi glacier with no stakes involved was so much less cool an introduction than one where she sweeps in like hellfire just as some little harfoot characters we’ve had time to grow fond of appear doomed.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Ello Sailor
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17237
Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Ello Sailor »

Climbing ice walls in search of an undying evil that would quite likely eviscerate you in an instant upon being discovered is pretty badass tho.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

McParadigm wrote:Well, my wife wanted to check it out so I ended up watching the first two episodes with her.

Mostly, I just wish they had learned the lesson of Fellowship (or A New Hope): start small, with characters who can be your stand-ins as the story evolves. Characters for whom much of what is to come will be as new, or confusing, or surprising, or tensely dramatic as it will be for you the viewer. Then slowly build the rest of your cast around that.

Starting with just Nori and Arondir would have been so much better than this. The harfoot story is about the intrusion of a changing world on peaceful and comfortable tranquility. The elf’s story covers the politics of the elves’ current situation and their terse relationship to middle earth, without the drag of walking and talking and walking and talking. It also introduces the return of evil in a much tighter and more “on the ground,” urgent manner than all of that Galadriel stuff.

Galadriel and Elrond just feel like characters we should be meeting along the way, because they are already in some way equipped to respond to these unfolding challenges and their root starting points just aren’t that interesting. Also, bringing them in as the story evolves would’ve protected us from that stupid (and oddly cheap looking) ocean sequence. That raft looked like it needed a rope bridge leading back to the rest of the Great Wolf Lodge.

That review went on longer than lord of the rings.
It even had a fake ending and then the following post!
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Simple Torture »

I liked all of the setup for Galadriel's story in the first episode, and I was really interested in a version of the story where she's got an obsession with proving to everyone that Sauron is still around and a threat and no one believing her. The king more or less exiling her to heaven makes sense if he doesn't believe her and doesn't want her to stir up trouble. It's a little deflating that he basically gives the order for her to go to Valinor and then admits to Elrond that she was right.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by 4/5 »

Simple Torture wrote:I liked all of the setup for Galadriel's story in the first episode, and I was really interested in a version of the story where she's got an obsession with proving to everyone that Sauron is still around and a threat and no one believing her. The king more or less exiling her to heaven makes sense if he doesn't believe her and doesn't want her to stir up trouble. It's a little deflating that he basically gives the order for her to go to Valinor and then admits to Elrond that she was right.
I had very similar feelings about this.

I enjoyed the first two episodes, second more than the first. I don't have too much to say right now, it's still in the early world-building stages. But it's all visually gorgeous and I like the initial story threads. Enough to be optimistic that the show could turn out to be really good.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bi_3 »

McParadigm wrote:
Starting with just Nori and Arondir would have been so much better than this. The harfoot story is about the intrusion of a changing world on peaceful and comfortable tranquility. The elf’s story covers the politics of the elves’ current situation and their terse relationship to middle earth, without the drag of walking and talking and walking and talking. It also introduces the return of evil in a much tighter and more “on the ground,” urgent manner than all of that Galadriel stuff.
:thumbsup:

That would have made it much easier to slide into the world.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by elliseamos »

I do like dwarves.

Two good episodes.

Slapping the orc head on the table to prove her point was badass.

I'm for it.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bammer »

Stopping by to appreciate the efficiency of this thread.

Marvel and Star Wars tools could learn a thing or two.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

We owe you nothing Bammer. Nothing.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bi_3 »

elliseamos wrote:I do like dwarves.

Two good episodes.

Slapping the orc head on the table to prove her point was badass.

I'm for it.

That was definitely the low point of an otherwise solid episode.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

It was the only point that made sense to the gen pop.

I think they went a little too hard with her determination re Sauron and it got confusing why she was so pissed (I watched it with pals and they didn’t know why she was pissed. Again. ) but that moment reminded them.

Tiny moments like that paint big pictures while we’re looking elsewhere kinda
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Episode 3 was fantastic.

Eejit is now part of lord of the rings canon :)
A specifically Dublin word.
That’s actual cultural appropriation but we’ll let it go :)
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Simple Torture »

My wife's grandmother was a big "eejit" user; she was from Roscommon.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
daft twat
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5355
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:23 am
Location: The In Between

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by daft twat »

Hopefully the Harfoots take to calling the children weans soon. And they can reply, “Yes, Da.”
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Simple Torture wrote:My wife's grandmother was a big "eejit" user; she was from Roscommon.

Love it :)
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by elliseamos »

I liked it and I'm looking forward to next week.
Post Reply