Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

[epilogue]

More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

[tragabigzanda]

FUCK ICE

[simple schoolboy]

More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

[Bi_3]

More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

The thing is that Trump has done actual bad things that should disqualify him from office, including illegally take classified docs, but the media making shit up to feed delusional blue-teamers and sell ads just creates public distrust in the DOJ/FBI and compromises their ability to get him for the bad shit he has done. Just let him go.

[epilogue]

More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

My post was in reference to the the fact that the article doesn't actually say "looks like the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes."

Bi loves giving grief to outlets for misleading headlines and yet is constantly doing so himself.

If we want to talk about "talking heads" being reckless that's fair game. It's a great conversation to have. And maybe one Bi should listen to.

[epilogue]

More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

The thing is that Trump has done actual bad things that should disqualify him from office, including illegally take classified docs, but the media making shit up to feed delusional blue-teamers and sell ads just creates public distrust in the DOJ/FBI and compromises their ability to get him for the bad shit he has done. Just let him go.

"Hey kettle? Yeah, it's pot... YOU'RE BLACK!"

[B]

How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

[simple schoolboy]

How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

[B]

Special Counsel Jack Smith coming for Trump.

[BurtReynolds]

How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

[simple schoolboy]

How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

I thought that was an endless stream of bi-curious interns.

[Bi_3]

How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

I thought that was an endless stream of bi_3-curious interns.

[simple schoolboy]

How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

I thought that was an endless stream of bi_3-curious interns.

*sapiosexuals

[4/5]

Former president and current presidential candidate: Terminate the Constitution.

Everybody: shrugs.

I guess we're all finally completely numb to him?

[Ello Sailor]

If that's what it takes to own the libs!!1

[BurtReynolds]

I think everyone is trying to ignore him, and he won't tweet, so no one knows what he's saying anyway.

[Bi_3]

Former president and current presidential candidate: Terminate the Constitution.

Everybody: shrugs.

I guess we're all finally completely numb to him?

[4/5]

Hoping that's fake.

[Bi_3]

Hoping that's fake.

[B]

For the record, the guys who thought up the Electoral College were probably kind of OK with false and fraudulent elections.