tragabigzanda wrote:wow imagine a world where big pharma has pull over legislation
It's uncommon at this level on such progressive policies from a very public red team figure, particularly in that Noem is definitely on the shortlist for VP in the next cycle.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
He says it explicitly at 1:17 and again at 1:23.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
That was really something to see. Reinforces why I quit watching cable news more than a decade ago.
The Social Security Administration says that Social Security will be insolvent by 2035.
Based on our best estimates, the 2022 reports determine:
• The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays retirement and survivors benefits, will be able to pay scheduled benefits on a timely basis until 2034, one year later than reported last year. At that time, the fund's reserves will become depleted and continuing tax income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of scheduled benefits.
Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
He says it explicitly at 1:17 and again at 1:23.
he says no but argues that it would be better off using the S&P
thats like saying No i am not hungry but boy i sure could go for a burger
It's like the mfers didn't even run a google search.
dont fool yourself. they knew. but they dont care because he won and it gives them a body. it's amazing to me that Al Franken resigned over a photograph that trump and others questioned and raised concerns about his character but just shrug their shoulders with a big ol "Meh" response
It's like the mfers didn't even run a google search.
dont fool yourself. they knew. but they dont care because he won and it gives them a body. it's amazing to me that Al Franken resigned over a photograph that trump and others questioned and raised concerns about his character but just shrug their shoulders with a big ol "Meh" response
Just shows more and more of their hypocrisy and that their true agenda is nothing more than being anti-democrat. They have no desire to actually make anything better. All that matters is sticking it to the dems
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
