Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

You Know What To Do!

Getaway
42
13%
Mind Your Manners
8
2%
My Father's Son
38
12%
Sirens
23
7%
Lightning Bolt
21
6%
Infallible
38
12%
Pendulum
88
27%
Swallowed Whole
21
6%
Let the Records Play
7
2%
Sleeping By Myself
7
2%
Yellow Moon
32
10%
Future Days
4
1%
 
Total votes: 329

jimmy mac
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon October 07, 2013 8:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by jimmy mac »

Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
Revelator
AnalLog
Posts: 1936
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Revelator »

BurtReynolds wrote:I never recovered from my girlfriend laughing at me over The Fixer, despite my efforts to hide it from her. Now I keep my fandom, such as it is, a secret.
What does she normally listen to? Admittedly I liked The Fixer the first time I heard it, but yeah the lyrics are not so good. Seems to go over well live though from what I've seen.
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Harry Lime »

Would I be right in thinking that this is the most versatile set of songs since No Code?
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Jaeti »

jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
Yeah, that's definitely where it needs to go, but I'm so tired of the acoustic interludes to start encores. It would be different if more songs were mixed in, but I have to believe that the only ones that will be in the rotation will be Just Breathe, The End, and now Future Days. Eddie could make that portion of shows far more interesting if he wanted to, but I guess we kind of know by now that he doesn't really want to.

Unrelated, but I think Pendulum could be a killer show-opener.
Revelator
AnalLog
Posts: 1936
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Revelator »

Jaeti wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
Yeah, that's definitely where it needs to go, but I'm so tired of the acoustic interludes to start encores. It would be different if more songs were mixed in, but I have to believe that the only ones that will be in the rotation will be Just Breathe, The End, and now Future Days. Eddie could make that portion of shows far more interesting if he wanted to, but I guess we kind of know by now that he doesn't really want to.

Unrelated, but I think Pendulum could be a killer show-opener.
Agree, first time I heard Pendulum it had opener written all over it. Of the ones I've seen personally, I love the slow burning openers a la Hard To Imagine and/or Of The Girl
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Norah »

@SkitchP wrote:I feel like Lightning Bolt (song) is the generic pearl jam song that encompasses the entirety of backspacer, yet is better than most of it.
this
Tuolumne
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Tuolumne »

jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Lament »

Tuolumne wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
I was at Wrigley as well, and consider the Future Days- Mother opening to the encore to be possibly the low point of the thirty or so shows I've seen. I would've rather sat through Ed's 19 minute speech before Last Kiss at Camden I 2006 again. Thankfully Crown of Thorns followed it and was majestic.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by digster »

The crowd was completely dead for that entire song from where I was at Wrigley. No one was listening. Granted, I don't think that was entirely due to the song; people had been there for 6 or 7 hours, it was 1:30 in the morning or whatever it was, it was a song no one had heard before. But the song didn't help matters.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by bodysnatcher »

Tuolumne wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
Yeah, but it was a brand new song that no one had ever heard before, so of course it was gonna garner hyper attention and applause. After hearing on an album, or for a tour, it'll be a different story. I hope you're right though
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by harmless »

It certainly can't be the trainwreck it was last time if they play it live again. It's nice enough on the record, but for reasons that I don't think can be replicated on stage.
Last edited by harmless on Wed October 09, 2013 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

bodysnatcher wrote:
Tuolumne wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
Yeah, but it was a brand new song that no one had ever heard before, so of course it was gonna garner hyper attention and applause. After hearing on an album, or for a tour, it'll be a different story. I hope you're right though

Not to mention, by the time it was played at Wrigley, a very specific subsection of fans were there to appreciate. Most of whom were there to simply say "II STAYED AT THE WRIGLEY SHOW UNTIL 2 IN THE MORNING!" and were just excited they got to add "Saw Debut of : Lightning Bolt and Future Days" Wrigley 13 to their message board sig.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Harry Lime wrote:Would I be right in thinking that this is the most versatile set of songs since No Code?

maybe even moreso, but yes.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by harmless »

They should've got Sigur Ros's string quartet on that song.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

@SkitchP wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:
Tuolumne wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
Yeah, but it was a brand new song that no one had ever heard before, so of course it was gonna garner hyper attention and applause. After hearing on an album, or for a tour, it'll be a different story. I hope you're right though

Not to mention, by the time it was played at Wrigley, a very specific subsection of fans were there to appreciate. Most of whom were there to simply say "II STAYED AT THE WRIGLEY SHOW UNTIL 2 IN THE MORNING!" and were just excited they got to add "Saw Debut of : Lightning Bolt and Future Days" Wrigley 13 to their message board sig.

I thought about adding it to my sig to be cool, but I wasn't there and didn't want you judging me.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

stip wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:
Tuolumne wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
Yeah, but it was a brand new song that no one had ever heard before, so of course it was gonna garner hyper attention and applause. After hearing on an album, or for a tour, it'll be a different story. I hope you're right though

Not to mention, by the time it was played at Wrigley, a very specific subsection of fans were there to appreciate. Most of whom were there to simply say "II STAYED AT THE WRIGLEY SHOW UNTIL 2 IN THE MORNING!" and were just excited they got to add "Saw Debut of : Lightning Bolt and Future Days" Wrigley 13 to their message board sig.

I thought about adding it to my sig to be cool, but I wasn't there and didn't want you judging me.

I put you in my sig :(
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

@SkitchP wrote:
stip wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:
Tuolumne wrote:
jimmy mac wrote:
Dugg wrote:Anyone here post at the Pit? I need someone to start a petition for them NOT to play Future Days on Friday night. Thanks.
Someone said it earlier, but that song (I don't mind it) will suck the life out of a show. If they have to do it at all, has got to be part of a 2nd set opening sequence where they play a handful of slow shit.
I was at Wrigley and I don't think at all it sucked the life out of the show. I'm actually a minority here in that I like the song, but at Wrigley no one had heard it but it got a strong reaction I thought. That is really hard to do in a stadium, but I think anytime you've something that has a sing songy melody using his deep register, and it's quite enough to put a little extra emphasis on his voice, people pay attention in the live setting. It held everyone's attention where I was at and got a good applause.
Yeah, but it was a brand new song that no one had ever heard before, so of course it was gonna garner hyper attention and applause. After hearing on an album, or for a tour, it'll be a different story. I hope you're right though

Not to mention, by the time it was played at Wrigley, a very specific subsection of fans were there to appreciate. Most of whom were there to simply say "II STAYED AT THE WRIGLEY SHOW UNTIL 2 IN THE MORNING!" and were just excited they got to add "Saw Debut of : Lightning Bolt and Future Days" Wrigley 13 to their message board sig.

I thought about adding it to my sig to be cool, but I wasn't there and didn't want you judging me.

I put you in my sig :(

yeah, but that was for something I could be proud of! Not my Wrigley lies.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Lament »

@SkitchP wrote:Not to mention, by the time it was played at Wrigley, a very specific subsection of fans were there to appreciate. Most of whom were there to simply say "II STAYED AT THE WRIGLEY SHOW UNTIL 2 IN THE MORNING!" and were just excited they got to add "Saw Debut of : Lightning Bolt and Future Days" Wrigley 13 to their message board sig.
They were just thinking about how cool "Future Days" was gonna look written on the back of the Setlist Shirt they were gonna race outside to buy when the show ended so they could wear it while getting their 7 different Wrigley posters framed.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Lament wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:Not to mention, by the time it was played at Wrigley, a very specific subsection of fans were there to appreciate. Most of whom were there to simply say "II STAYED AT THE WRIGLEY SHOW UNTIL 2 IN THE MORNING!" and were just excited they got to add "Saw Debut of : Lightning Bolt and Future Days" Wrigley 13 to their message board sig.
They were just thinking about how cool "Future Days" was gonna look written on the back of the Setlist Shirt they were gonna race outside to buy when the show ended so they could wear it while getting their 7 different Wrigley posters framed.
just because the trading cards sold out before you got there is no reason to be bitter.
User avatar
Mike
Future Drummer
Posts: 3130
Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Mike »

harmless wrote:They should've got Sigur Ros's string quartet on that song.
Do they still work with Amiina?

Image
Post Reply