Foo Fighters

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post Reply
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by spike »

tragabigzanda wrote:gentlemen please, it's only the foo fighters, i assure you it's not worth it
:lol:
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by wease »

tragabigzanda wrote:gentlemen please, it's only the foo fighters, i assure you it's not worth it
You wouldn’t have said this in 1998.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by tragabigzanda »

Last edited by tragabigzanda on Mon January 12, 2026 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ello Sailor
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17238
Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by Ello Sailor »

Time travel to 1998 and keep duking it out, boys.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by Jorge »

When's the cutoff date for their coolness? 2003?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by tragabigzanda »

Last edited by tragabigzanda on Mon January 12, 2026 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Jorge wrote:When's the cutoff date for their coolness? 2003?
In Utero
User avatar
Ello Sailor
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17238
Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by Ello Sailor »

Pfft. As if self-titled Foos weren't cool as heck.

'03 was the cutoff for me. I thought One by One was decent on release (wrong, obviously -- it's trash) but that was likely bias and nostalgia talking. Also, kids are stupid.

In Your Honor was legitimately embarrassing and I haven't considered myself a fan since.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by warehouse »

until that 'shame shame' song i havent liked a foo fighters single since 'all my life'. they remind me of weezer, first few albums are great, then they completely go to shit.
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by bart »

Grohl’s career arc reminds me of George Harrison’s - a pretty good songwriter gets temporarily pushed into being a great one by proximity to genius, puts out an album with several years worth of pent up material that makes everyone say holy shit who knew this guy had this in him, then it turns out that’s pretty much all there was and he settles into a career of being himself, playing on other people’s records, and every once in a while putting out a mediocre album of his own.
User avatar
Ello Sailor
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17238
Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by Ello Sailor »

warehouse wrote:until that 'shame shame' song i havent liked a foo fighters single since 'all my life'. they remind me of weezer, first few albums are great, then they completely go to shit.
Can anyone confirm that this Shame x2 song is worth listening to?
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by Jorge »

No it is truly awful
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10373
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by liebzz »

This band has always been a bit of an enigma to me. I don’t hate their material- new or old really. But they never quite live up to expectations, and I don’t expect them to blow me away either. I just have a hard time with them because conceptually it seems like it should be fun. I mean, the documentaries are cool in theory. They kitschy fake horror movie seems like fun. The pseudonyms with disco and metal albums tracks with fun and willing to kick the tires. Why don’t I enjoy them more? Hell, I have even seen them 4 times (1997, 2000 opening for RHCP, 2011 on one of their marathon set tours, and 2012 at Global Citizens). I should be a big fan right? Why aren’t I?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by VinylGuy »

They became something different around 2002 I think. I liked some stuff on In Your Honor and loved Wasting Light but after that one it’s all a parody, even the live shows are pretty much the same.

And Dave become so huge it was tiresome.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by warehouse »

Ello Sailor wrote:
warehouse wrote:until that 'shame shame' song i havent liked a foo fighters single since 'all my life'. they remind me of weezer, first few albums are great, then they completely go to shit.
Can anyone confirm that this Shame x2 song is worth listening to?
its worth listening to at least once b/c it doesnt sound like their other singles. it more grove-driven than their stadium rock singles
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by warehouse »

bart wrote:Grohl’s career arc reminds me of George Harrison’s - a pretty good songwriter gets temporarily pushed into being a great one by proximity to genius, puts out an album with several years worth of pent up material that makes everyone say holy shit who knew this guy had this in him, then it turns out that’s pretty much all there was and he settles into a career of being himself, playing on other people’s records, and every once in a while putting out a mediocre album of his own.
no offense, this is a terrible summary of george harrison's career. the guys a genius in his own right.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by McParadigm »

I dunno, feels more right than wrong to me.
(patriotic choking noises)
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10373
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by liebzz »

We could buy all his records and judge for ourselves…

But it’s gonna take money, a whole lot of spending money, it gonna take plenty of money, to do it to do it to do it to do it right.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by bodysnatcher »

Is there an option to have a thread permanently marked as read?
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Foo Fighters

Post by wease »

liebzz wrote:We could buy all his records and judge for ourselves…

But it’s gonna take money, a whole lot of spending money, it gonna take plenty of money, to do it to do it to do it to do it right.
Not even his song…
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
Post Reply