The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 5:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

simple schoolboy wrote:
96583UP wrote:something about the way he looks

just makes me think he's guilty
Okay there, Khmer Rogue, by all means let's force him to work in the fields and be re-educated because of his bourgeois glasses.
nope, not the glasses… it’s something else… but I just can’t quite put my finger on it
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

tragabigzanda wrote:Wtf Bi
ok call me
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

tragabigzanda wrote:Wtf Bi
?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

Firstly, the $14M is just what he's contributed to campaigns above board. It says nothing of what he's given to PACs that he and they don't have to disclose publicly. The link you provided even states "huge sums of dark money."

Second of all, it's not even about the direct influence.

Crow not only has greater ability to connect Thomas (and his wife) with countless other influential people, but Crow can also boast that he can influence Thomas on another person's behalf. Which is even more beneficial for this other person because Crow can claim it's not a "specific ruling before Thomas that relates to Crow's businesses."

I agree that this story will not change anything about Thomas's seat, but it will certainly inspire some conversation about some new rules for justices moving forward.

Lastly, would these people be "friends", one's where it makes complete sense for Crow to pay for Thomas to go on vacation, if Thomas weren't a justice?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Y’all sound a lot like the anti-Soros crowd right now.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

throw him in the slammer
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

I expected this exact whataboutism to show up sooner.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

look, everyone is entitled to a little hitler memoriabilia now and then
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by JuanHamm »

Has phase two begun yet?
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

JuanHamm wrote:Has phase two begun yet?
Yes. It’s under “Operation Dark Trump”



Edit:

Here’s a story on it from prior to phase 2:

https://www.dallasnews.com/arts-enterta ... rows-home/
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

This isn't about, Harlan Crow.

This is about Clarence Thomas.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

blueviper wrote:As a public servant he should know the ethical problems this raises.

Even myself as a lowly local government employee go through ethics training and have guidelines on gifts that are or are not acceptable. I don’t let vendors take me out for lunches. Anything provided by a vendor as a gift or thanks to the city has to be $50 or below.

He’s at the highest level of government. And a judge. He should know better.
If only we'd had a hint of his unethical behavior before he was sworn onto the Court! :shake:
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by warehouse »

Bi_3 wrote:
warehouse wrote:how much wealthier can he be then clarence thomas? i can't believe people buy this excuse that it's just some guy being a good friend
Thomas has a net worth of around $10M

Crow manages between $20 to $30 billion in a private asset holding company

Crow has donated ~$14M total to republicans over the last 30 years: https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politic ... 3m-to-gop/


Compare this to SBF in 2020 alone: https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/ftx-sa ... ions-2022/
why would anyone compare anything to that weirdo? lol

how much is his wife worth? i can't believe people are pretending these people are friends
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

So the new info about Thomas' real estate deal is actually problematic. That must be disclosed.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 5:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40177
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by wease »

Bi_3 wrote:So the new info about Thomas' real estate deal is actually problematic. That must be disclosed.
Not heard about this yet.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15499
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Chris_H_2 »

the federal bar has a requirement that mandates all members to report what they know to be violations of codes and cannons of ethics by other members of the bar, including judges and justices. i presume the same is true for other members of the court about their colleagues.
Post Reply