The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

elliseamos wrote:Felt left out Gorsuch?
It emerged Tuesday that after nearly two years of trying to sell a vacation property, Gorsuch and two partners found a buyer — who happened to be the head of a major law firm that often practices before the high court. That's according to a financial disclosure report, which shows the sale to Greenberg Traurig CEO Brian Duffy came a month after Gorsuch was appointed to the Supreme Court in April 2017.
If this is the best oppo research they have, Gorsuch is fine. I don't understand this grasping at the Justices. Ground work for impeachment/ nullification?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 4/5 »

Yeah there are lots of examples of this. Absolutely brutal, overt theft by state governments. I read about this months ago when the Court took the case so I'm light on details at the moment but I think there's a handful of states who do this and one or two in particular who have done this repeatedly.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

4/5 wrote:Yeah there are lots of examples of this. Absolutely brutal, overt theft by state governments. I read about this months ago when the Court took the case so I'm light on details at the moment but I think there's a handful of states who do this and one or two in particular who have done this repeatedly.
They have so far refused to blow up civil asset forfeiture. Turns out when you are on the government payroll, you are incentivised to not pay too much attention to where that money comes from.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Wow, court legitimacy used to be a big thing around here huh
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:
Thomas and Alito are going to be SOOOOOOOO mad if they don't get 3 other Justices to give States the power to destroy Black people over $2,300.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/s ... taxes.html

Unanimous in favor of Geraldine! :shock:
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Skipping to phase 4: Hardcore pivot from Thomas to Kavanaugh incoming!
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

96583UP wrote:these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4


So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by JuanHamm »

Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4


So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
What a bitch
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

JuanHamm wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4


So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
What a bitch
Exactly

Women are not supposed to be in the workforce

This is haram
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4


So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
None of that is testimony to hers or her husband's ethics.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4


So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
None of that is testimony to hers or her husband's ethics.

Are you OK? Do you need a COVID booster?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

What did I miss?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

this has to be Phase 3 finally, right?
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by JuanHamm »

This is phase 2-b
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

i mean

why can’t it just be called phase 3

it’s not like there has to be a top limit to phases

or does there

fak

we need direction

Q instruct us
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Phase 5 is appoint 6 new Justices.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.


Anyway… Not that y’all care about reality but Alito dropped some interesting nugs recently:
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post Reply