B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?
In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued
So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?
You haven't always been this deranged, have you?
I can’t speak to the PhatJ’s and R2D’s of the world who have abandoned RM, but for those still here, B has easily fallen off the cliff more than anyone over the past few years.
I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.
That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?
Alito is just sad that people don't like him.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
B wrote:I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.
That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?
Alito is just sad that people don't like him.
Frankly, yes. Threatening judges and their families before is a tool to induce them to change their vote before the final decision is rendered. Threatening the Justices after the decision does nothing, because it's been set and is now law. These are clearly different levels of danger for those involved. You come off as digging for some rationale to downplay the situation because you are good with threatening them and their families in this way. I'm not saying you are, just that it reads that way.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
B wrote:I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.
That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?
Alito is just sad that people don't like him.
Frankly, yes. Threatening judges and their families before is a tool to induce them to change their vote before the final decision is rendered. Threatening the Justices after the decision does nothing, because it's been set and is now law. These are clearly different levels of danger for those involved. You come off as digging for some rationale to downplay the situation because you are good with threatening them and their families in this way. I'm not saying you are, just that it reads that way.
Every human being on Earth knew the minute they heard the Dobbs case that they were going to overrule Roe. I don't think it's credible to say they were a target just because it happened to leak. I get that you think I'm wrong, whatever.
But you can shove "deranged" up your asses, especially given that exactly one person was arrested in those 5 weeks.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda and thin dick
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Right on cue.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Right on cue.
im not a law expert by any means but it seems to me if you are a judge and your wife is paid by clients who are before your court then yes, its illegitmate/compromised or whatever you want to say it is. its not right and the fact that no one in power on the court sees this as a problem hints that most if not all of them have compromised values to some degree and are engaging in this sort of behavior
Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Right on cue.
im not a law expert by any means but it seems to me if you are a judge and your wife is paid by clients who are before your court then yes, its illegitmate/compromised or whatever you want to say it is. its not right and the fact that no one in power on the court sees this as a problem hints that most if not all of them have compromised values to some degree and are engaging in this sort of behavior
Excellent and entirely independently derived conclusion
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone