The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued
Clearly Roberts the squish would be the most viable target.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued
So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued
So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?
You haven't always been this deranged, have you?
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bammer »

simple schoolboy wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued
So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?
You haven't always been this deranged, have you?
I can’t speak to the PhatJ’s and R2D’s of the world who have abandoned RM, but for those still here, B has easily fallen off the cliff more than anyone over the past few years.

What happened to you.

Get a grip, man.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.

That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?

Alito is just sad that people don't like him.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Make no mistake, rm's star wars contingent has always been as deranged as the macphistos/phatjs/r2ds.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

B wrote:I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.

That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?

Alito is just sad that people don't like him.

Frankly, yes. Threatening judges and their families before is a tool to induce them to change their vote before the final decision is rendered. Threatening the Justices after the decision does nothing, because it's been set and is now law. These are clearly different levels of danger for those involved. You come off as digging for some rationale to downplay the situation because you are good with threatening them and their families in this way. I'm not saying you are, just that it reads that way.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

This is a big one, and one that's had potential to be coming down the pipeline.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.

That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?

Alito is just sad that people don't like him.

Frankly, yes. Threatening judges and their families before is a tool to induce them to change their vote before the final decision is rendered. Threatening the Justices after the decision does nothing, because it's been set and is now law. These are clearly different levels of danger for those involved. You come off as digging for some rationale to downplay the situation because you are good with threatening them and their families in this way. I'm not saying you are, just that it reads that way.
Every human being on Earth knew the minute they heard the Dobbs case that they were going to overrule Roe. I don't think it's credible to say they were a target just because it happened to leak. I get that you think I'm wrong, whatever.

But you can shove "deranged" up your asses, especially given that exactly one person was arrested in those 5 weeks.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda and thin dick
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

B wrote:Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda.
I'm guessing this is probably closer to being accurate than many people want to acknowledge.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Right on cue.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by JuanHamm »

Wait, did we skip phase 4?
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Peeps »

Bi_3 wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Right on cue.
im not a law expert by any means but it seems to me if you are a judge and your wife is paid by clients who are before your court then yes, its illegitmate/compromised or whatever you want to say it is. its not right and the fact that no one in power on the court sees this as a problem hints that most if not all of them have compromised values to some degree and are engaging in this sort of behavior
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Right on cue.
im not a law expert by any means but it seems to me if you are a judge and your wife is paid by clients who are before your court then yes, its illegitmate/compromised or whatever you want to say it is. its not right and the fact that no one in power on the court sees this as a problem hints that most if not all of them have compromised values to some degree and are engaging in this sort of behavior
Excellent and entirely independently derived conclusion
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

soooooo we did do phase 3 after all

and 4 apparently

wtf
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by JuanHamm »

96583UP wrote:soooooo we did do phase 3 after all

and 4 apparently

wtf
We need more transparency regarding phases. This is getting out of control.
Nihilist lives don't matter
Post Reply