Box office talk!

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12530
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Box office talk!

Post by bada »

The first time I saw the trailer for Elemental I thought didn't this movie come out years ago? It highly derivative of past Pixar.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46215
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Box office talk!

Post by BurtReynolds »

Seems a little strange that people suddenly got tired of the Pixar formula and tired cliche plots, but I'm not complaining.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40639
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Box office talk!

Post by wease »

bada wrote:The first time I saw the trailer for Elemental I thought didn't this movie come out years ago? It highly derivative of past Pixar.
Wait. It’s not a sequel to another movie?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12530
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Box office talk!

Post by bada »

wease wrote:
bada wrote:The first time I saw the trailer for Elemental I thought didn't this movie come out years ago? It highly derivative of past Pixar.
Wait. It’s not a sequel to another movie?

At first I thought it was a sequel to Inside Out but instead of feelings with feelings its the periodic table with feelings.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40639
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Box office talk!

Post by wease »

bada wrote:
wease wrote:
bada wrote:The first time I saw the trailer for Elemental I thought didn't this movie come out years ago? It highly derivative of past Pixar.
Wait. It’s not a sequel to another movie?

At first I thought it was a sequel to Inside Out but instead of feelings with feelings its the periodic table with feelings.
That’s what I thought it was. So it’s a totally different movie then. Wow
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21685
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Simple Torture »

With these kids movies, I’ve discovered that if my daughter knows about it and is excited to go, it’s almost certainly a hit.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21685
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Simple Torture »

Simple Torture wrote:With these kids movies, I’ve discovered that if my daughter knows about it and is excited to go, it’s almost certainly a hit.
Although she does like some stinkers, she doesn’t miss a hit. We saw all 3 of the kids films in the top 10 box office for the year during their opening weekend.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46215
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Box office talk!

Post by BurtReynolds »

It does look like Inside Out, but that one was pretty popular (even though I thought it looked rather ugly).
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36746
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Jorge »

Simple Torture wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:With these kids movies, I’ve discovered that if my daughter knows about it and is excited to go, it’s almost certainly a hit.
Although she does like some stinkers, she doesn’t miss a hit. We saw all 3 of the kids films in the top 10 box office for the year during their opening weekend.
How does she feel about Oppenheimer
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48465
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Box office talk!

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:With these kids movies, I’ve discovered that if my daughter knows about it and is excited to go, it’s almost certainly a hit.
Although she does like some stinkers, she doesn’t miss a hit. We saw all 3 of the kids films in the top 10 box office for the year during their opening weekend.
How does she feel about Oppenheimer
Not enough nudity.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29861
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Box office talk!

Post by 96583UP »

i love a good pervy period piece
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46215
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Box office talk!

Post by BurtReynolds »

Flash with a 72% drop. Impressive.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36746
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Jorge »

Five of the top 10 films of the year so far can be considered flops (Fast X, The Little Mermaid, Ant Man: Quantumania, Transformers: Rise of the Beasts, The Flash). That's wild. Budgets need to get under control
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21685
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Simple Torture »

The budget thing is probably true. Call me stupid, but I have no idea why budgets are so high nowadays—is it all VFX? Shooting on location? Salaries for big stars? Something else?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43401
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Box office talk!

Post by VinylGuy »

and marketing too.

Kinda surprised The Flash is such a big flop. Guessing Gunn rebooting everything didnt help. This is not looking good for Aquaman 2.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46215
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Box office talk!

Post by BurtReynolds »

Marketing is probably the biggest factor. VFX houses seem to be underpaid, but it's still expensive to do the effects. The money is going somewhere.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21685
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Simple Torture »

I was under the impression that when you see a listed budget for a film that marketing is not included. Surely, that makes some of these films even bigger losers for the studios.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43401
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Box office talk!

Post by VinylGuy »

its not included in most cases but its still money they need to get back.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11933
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Box office talk!

Post by The Argonaut »

Critical Drinker recently had a video that looks at the maths of it all a bit. He's saying Indy 5 is destined to be a flop in part because it cost $300M. Then add another 50% for marketing and give the cinemas their 50% cut of the box office take and the movie would need to make $900M global box office just to break even. Assuming Harrison Ford or someone else is only getting a salary and not a cut of the profits themselves. And why spend $450M to just break even. This thing would need to be one of the ten or fifteen biggest movies of all time for it to have been worthwhile, money wise.

And that ain't gonna happen
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36746
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Box office talk!

Post by Jorge »

Simple Torture wrote:I was under the impression that when you see a listed budget for a film that marketing is not included. Surely, that makes some of these films even bigger losers for the studios.
It's not! Marketing is a hidden number and rarely disclosed. The bigger the movie, the bigger the marketing budget, and I've seen a lot of trades that default to doubling the production budget when they estimate how much money a film needs to generate a profit.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Post Reply