Oh you wanna go??lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Get bent.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
Sequels that are better than the original
- Farmer John
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47946
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Nah. I'm tired.Farmer John wrote:Oh you wanna go??lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Get bent.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- Farmer John
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Me, too. Have good night!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Nah. I'm tired.Farmer John wrote:Oh you wanna go??lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Get bent.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47946
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
You as well. I'll give you a ring tomorrow.Farmer John wrote:Me, too. Have good night!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Nah. I'm tired.Farmer John wrote:Oh you wanna go??lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Get bent.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- Farmer John
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
An engagement ring, I hope.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:You as well. I'll give you a ring tomorrow.Farmer John wrote:Me, too. Have good night!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Nah. I'm tired.Farmer John wrote:Oh you wanna go??lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Get bent.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47946
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Yep phone s*x is very engaging.Farmer John wrote:An engagement ring, I hope.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:You as well. I'll give you a ring tomorrow.Farmer John wrote:Me, too. Have good night!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Nah. I'm tired.Farmer John wrote:Oh you wanna go??lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Get bent.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- Farmer John
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Goodnight, Lenny.
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11799
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Fellowship is my favorite, too, but I kind of tend to think of all three movies as one big project. The subsequent films aren't sequels in the typical sense, to meJuanHamm wrote:Fellowship is my favorite.
Please consider voting for me
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47946
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
What is your favorite Harry Potter film?The Argonaut wrote:Fellowship is my favorite, too, but I kind of tend to think of all three movies as one big project. The subsequent films aren't sequels in the typical sense, to meJuanHamm wrote:Fellowship is my favorite.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11799
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Haven't watched any since I was like eighteen or nineteen. Kind of interested to watch the Cuaron one, thoughlennytheweedwhacker wrote:What is your favorite Harry Potter film?The Argonaut wrote:Fellowship is my favorite, too, but I kind of tend to think of all three movies as one big project. The subsequent films aren't sequels in the typical sense, to meJuanHamm wrote:Fellowship is my favorite.
Please consider voting for me
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47946
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Cool. See ya later.The Argonaut wrote:Haven't watched any since I was like eighteen or nineteen. Kind of interested to watch the Cuaron one, thoughlennytheweedwhacker wrote:What is your favorite Harry Potter film?The Argonaut wrote:Fellowship is my favorite, too, but I kind of tend to think of all three movies as one big project. The subsequent films aren't sequels in the typical sense, to meJuanHamm wrote:Fellowship is my favorite.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Manhunter is an adaptation of Red Dragon. It is a stand alone film with no sequel and some genuinely terrible performances.Farmer John wrote:What makes them unrelated? The different actors?epilogue wrote:The movies themselves are unrelated.Farmer John wrote:But they're in the same universe though, right? They both have Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, etc.bart wrote:The novels are related but the movies aren’tFarmer John wrote:Is Silence of the Lambs a sequel to Manhunter?
Red Dragon however is a sequel to Silence of the Lambs. Well, prequel.
Silence of the Lambs is an adaptation of Silence of the Lambs and it does not take anything from Manhunter. Though the book it's based on is a sequel, the film is not a sequel to any film. It's a reboot of the franchise but starting in the middle. There are no terrible performances.
Red Dragon and Hannibal are direct sequels to Lambs and also have nothing at all to do with Manhunter or its terrible performances.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36487
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
I think Joe is already saying this, but the post gets a little confusing to me with movies and books sharing names so I want to untangle it.
The Silence of the Lambs (book) is a sequel to Red Dragon (book). Manhunter (movie) is an adaptation of Red Dragon (book). It's also a cool and stylish movie, worth watching
The Silence of the Lambs (movie) is an adaptation of The Silence of the Lambs (book), but it doesn't acknowledge the events of Manhunter (movie) at all. It casts a new guy as Hannibal, it changes his characterization completely, it changes his holding cell. It even changes the spelling of his name (Lecter, which is novel-accurate, versus Lecktor which is how they spelled it in Manhunter for some reason).
More significantly, it was produced and distributed by different companies, and not marketed as a sequel to Manhunter because Manhunter flopped on release. The Silence of the Lambs (movie) is also an absolute masterpiece.
You can sort of call The Silence of the Lambs (movie) a sequel to Manhunter, but there are too many details that are different. It's like if you called Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings movie a sequel to the old animated The Hobbit adaptation. Doesn't really work.
Years later, after TSOL film and its sequel Hannibal proved very profitable, they decided to try their hand at adapting Red Dragon (book) with Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal, more firmly establishing it within the same world as the other two movies. It's a bad movie, directed by mega-hack Brett Ratner, and it very artificially pumps up Hannibal's role in the narrative where in the book (and in Manhunter) he's only in one scene). They even tease an appearance of Clarice Starling at the end.
So you could say Red Dragon (movie) is a prequel to The Silence of the Lambs (movie) because it was made after it but takes place before it.
Then there's the prequel novel and movie Hannibal Rising which are not even worth acknowledging. Thomas Harris clearly realized he had a cash cow in his hands and nothing else he wrote seemed to get any traction.
The Silence of the Lambs (book) is a sequel to Red Dragon (book). Manhunter (movie) is an adaptation of Red Dragon (book). It's also a cool and stylish movie, worth watching
The Silence of the Lambs (movie) is an adaptation of The Silence of the Lambs (book), but it doesn't acknowledge the events of Manhunter (movie) at all. It casts a new guy as Hannibal, it changes his characterization completely, it changes his holding cell. It even changes the spelling of his name (Lecter, which is novel-accurate, versus Lecktor which is how they spelled it in Manhunter for some reason).
More significantly, it was produced and distributed by different companies, and not marketed as a sequel to Manhunter because Manhunter flopped on release. The Silence of the Lambs (movie) is also an absolute masterpiece.
You can sort of call The Silence of the Lambs (movie) a sequel to Manhunter, but there are too many details that are different. It's like if you called Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings movie a sequel to the old animated The Hobbit adaptation. Doesn't really work.
Years later, after TSOL film and its sequel Hannibal proved very profitable, they decided to try their hand at adapting Red Dragon (book) with Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal, more firmly establishing it within the same world as the other two movies. It's a bad movie, directed by mega-hack Brett Ratner, and it very artificially pumps up Hannibal's role in the narrative where in the book (and in Manhunter) he's only in one scene). They even tease an appearance of Clarice Starling at the end.
So you could say Red Dragon (movie) is a prequel to The Silence of the Lambs (movie) because it was made after it but takes place before it.
Then there's the prequel novel and movie Hannibal Rising which are not even worth acknowledging. Thomas Harris clearly realized he had a cash cow in his hands and nothing else he wrote seemed to get any traction.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36487
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
I think my post ended up being even more confusing
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Ello Sailor
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17234
- Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Damn, his filmography is pretty awful, but I enjoyed Red Dragon well enough.Jorge wrote:It's a bad movie, directed by mega-hack Brett Ratner
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36487
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
It skates by on good performances by Edward Norton, Emily Watson and (especially) Ralph Fiennes, but it's directed with all the sense of style and artistry of a soap detergent commercial. I also hate the way they changed the ending. The novel is good
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10759
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
I think this thread already exists...
Wrath of Kahn
Empire Strikes Back
T2
Wrath of Kahn
Empire Strikes Back
T2
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Fiennes and Watson were good yeah, but that movie is such an awful one. Its so fucking bland.Jorge wrote:It skates by on good performances by Edward Norton, Emily Watson and (especially) Ralph Fiennes, but it's directed with all the sense of style and artistry of a soap detergent commercial. I also hate the way they changed the ending. The novel is good
Manhunter is a stylish masterpiece. Thats the one you gotta see.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
Just read the book. Red Dragon (novel) is far and away better than either movie adaptation.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36487
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Sequels that are better than the original
The second half of the third season of the TV show Hannibal adapts that same story and does a good job with it. With some pretty major changes, but still good.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.