NBA Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Coach »

I don't like him or Tatum all that much for these super max, but I think they are good enough to win a title and I credit the org for taking the gamble.

Brown was super max or bust, and would never have returned to Boston if they hadn't offered this deal. He dislikes the city and has taken shots at it. Very sensitive "super" star.

But, this is basketball and not hockey so it is what it is with these divas.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Coach wrote:Brown lobbied hard to make second team all-nba, so his contract incentive would kick-in for the possible super max. This was all negotiated years ago.
Yeah, tying contracts and max pay to honors voted on by media is probably not a reasonable thing to do at this point.

Does what you just said serve as a response to my idea:
my play would have been to tell him we love you and want you here but we can't give you the full bag. Make a substantial but much lower offer (5/$200m) and when he rejects it, give him permission to seek a trade. My bet is that nobody out there would be willing to give Boston real assets AND offer him the biggest contract in the game. At this point Boston could increase their offer a bit perhaps (5/$230 or 240) and he might be willing to sign it after seeing that he wasn't getting $300m anywhere else.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Coach »

4/5 wrote:
Coach wrote:Brown lobbied hard to make second team all-nba, so his contract incentive would kick-in for the possible super max. This was all negotiated years ago.
Yeah, tying contracts and max pay to honors voted on by media is probably not a reasonable thing to do at this point.

Does what you just said serve as a response to my idea:
my play would have been to tell him we love you and want you here but we can't give you the full bag. Make a substantial but much lower offer (5/$200m) and when he rejects it, give him permission to seek a trade. My bet is that nobody out there would be willing to give Boston real assets AND offer him the biggest contract in the game. At this point Boston could increase their offer a bit perhaps (5/$230 or 240) and he might be willing to sign it after seeing that he wasn't getting $300m anywhere else.
I think Boston negotiated this deal years ago and was comfortable going super max all the way and not messing around, especially after having him in all those trade rumors the last few years.

I like your plan, but I feel like it would have been too big a gamble for the team. I dunno, it's hard because I don't really love their two superstars lol.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Coach wrote:Brown was super max or bust, and would never have returned to Boston if they hadn't offered this deal. He dislikes the city and has taken shots at it. Very sensitive "super" star.
Now I'm gonna add to my scenario. I hear that and maybe it's right. But what do you think is the best offer he could have gotten elsewhere? What if Boston was the highest but it wasn't the supermax? That wouldn't be tenable?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Admittedly, the personality stuff probably blows up my plan from the start.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Coach »

4/5 wrote:
Coach wrote:Brown was super max or bust, and would never have returned to Boston if they hadn't offered this deal. He dislikes the city and has taken shots at it. Very sensitive "super" star.
Now I'm gonna add to my scenario. I hear that and maybe it's right. But what do you think is the best offer he could have gotten elsewhere? What if Boston was the highest but it wasn't the supermax? That wouldn't be tenable?
I think he would hold out and things would get messy, I really do.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Coach »

On the bright side, a few days before all this he partnered with Red Bull to rebuild and redesign a bunch of bball courts in Boston. Public ones in tough neighborhoods.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

tragabigzanda wrote:i hate in sports when someone says "i got it!" but then they miss it.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 09, 2026 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Coach wrote:I think he would hold out and things would get messy, I really do.
You're probably right. I'm just going to hope that "make him go left" remains elite defensive strategy lol.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Coach »

Call me skeptically optimistic about the C's offseason.
User avatar
Higgs
Petulant Bitch
Posts: 7043
Joined: Thu February 02, 2017 10:39 am
Location: Most likely at the office...

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Higgs »

If I was Jaylen Brown and already making fuck off money even before the supermax, I legit would have requested to sign for a lesser amount, say $40 mill a season, flat.

More money than I could ever hope to spend anyway, leaves some cap space for the team to continue to build, and is self-aware enough to understand that I'm not the actual greatest player in the NBA.

Also, nice legacy move and allows you the best chance to play on a contending team in the future.

I mean seriously, $200 million over 5 years isn't enough?

I'm glad Boston stayed with him (even if I was calling for his head after the Heat series) but I'm disappointed that he had to cost so much. I don't believe he is a supermax calibre player and don't believe he ever truly will be. He's damn good, but he ain't that guy.
Free boops today.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Bammer »

Higgs, it seems like you genuinely think he cares about Celtics fans and winning them a championship as opposed to taking their money.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Higgs
Petulant Bitch
Posts: 7043
Joined: Thu February 02, 2017 10:39 am
Location: Most likely at the office...

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Higgs »

I am aware of my naivety here.

Why can't we all just be nice to each other though? Is that so much to ask??
Free boops today.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Monkey_Driven »

I wish their was a "designated player" rule in the NBA that allowed one homegrown player's salary to only count for 60-80 percent of the cap.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Monkey_Driven wrote:I wish their was a "designated player" rule in the NBA that allowed one homegrown player's salary to only count for 60-80 percent of the cap.
You mean that only 60-80% of their salary would count towards the cap?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Monkey_Driven »

4/5 wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:I wish their was a "designated player" rule in the NBA that allowed one homegrown player's salary to only count for 60-80 percent of the cap.
You mean that only 60-80% of their salary would count towards the cap?
Yes, thanks for clarifying. I feel like the current system really penalizes good team building and keeping the veterans you developed.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

tragabigzanda wrote:i hate in sports when someone says "i got it!" but then they miss it.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 09, 2026 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: NBA Thread

Post by Coach »

They had a Celtics beat writer on the radio the other day. Can't remember which one, but he said the NBA expects to grow revenues by a lot as a result of a new TV deal. The cap is then expected to just keep rising, meaning the Brown contract will eat up less of the overall budget.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Coach wrote:They had a Celtics beat writer on the radio the other day. Can't remember which one, but he said the NBA expects to grow revenues by a lot as a result of a new TV deal. The cap is then expected to just keep rising, meaning the Brown contract will eat up less of the overall budget.
That's obviously the best argument for the deal not becoming punitive, but we'll see. Like I said the Celtics were in a tough spot as legit contender and Brown being eligible for that contract. It's madness because he isn't close to the best player in the league and yet that's how he's being paid.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: NBA Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Personally, I'd like to see all these complex formulas and max contracts that each guy can earn based on years and awards and previous contracts and all that go away. The max has a funny way of helping some guys (like Brown) get paid way more than they otherwise would and it keeps down the few guys that would generate true bidding wars.

I'm just thinking out loud here, I'm sure there'd be unanticipated consequences of what I just said.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

Post Reply