say what.epilogue wrote:Good things about this:Mecca wrote:No review yet. He must’ve died in the atom bomb test sceneepilogue wrote:Today's the day!
Seeing it 70mm but but IMAX
- Cillian Murphy, obviously
- Emily Blunt giving it his all
- The "black and white/color" sequences were fun
- Uhh
I really think this is an indefensibly bad movie, but it's not "anti man" or "dangerous" or whatever. It's completely nonsensical and gaudy but it's a fucking Nolan movie! The real problem to me is that it's deeply unfunny. I laughed once, at a Matt Damon line delivery during that FUCKING MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD scene where everyone just stands around talking shit out for what feels like 40 minutes. That line may have stopped me from walking out. Everything else is about on par with that "fireball" stuff from the first trailer. Really wish this had been good, because the people who hate it are being extremely annoying about it. 4/10
Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19163
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19163
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
did you post all that from your phone?epilogue wrote:goddamnit
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
No I copied Jorge's Barbie post and changed a few things to make it apply to Oppenheimer. It was supposed to be a wildly funny post but I forgot to change one pronoun and now the whole thing is ruined, I tell you, ruined!dad wrote:did you post all that from your phone?epilogue wrote:goddamnit
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19163
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
draw the curtains. the show's over for you.epilogue wrote:No I copied Jorge's Barbie post and changed a few things to make it apply to Oppenheimer. It was supposed to be a wildly funny post but I forgot to change one pronoun and now the whole thing is ruined, I tell you, ruined!dad wrote:did you post all that from your phone?epilogue wrote:goddamnit
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
Are you sure this review isn’t for Barbie?epilogue wrote:Good things about this:Mecca wrote:No review yet. He must’ve died in the atom bomb test sceneepilogue wrote:Today's the day!
Seeing it 70mm but but IMAX
- Cillian Murphy, obviously
- Emily Blunt giving it her all
- The "black and white/color" sequences were fun
- Uhh
I really think this is an indefensibly bad movie, but it's not "anti man" or "dangerous" or whatever. It's completely nonsensical and gaudy but it's a fucking Nolan movie! The real problem to me is that it's deeply unfunny. I laughed once, at a Matt Damon line delivery during that FUCKING MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD scene where everyone just stands around talking shit out for what feels like 40 minutes. That line may have stopped me from walking out. Everything else is about on par with that "fireball" stuff from the first trailer. Really wish this had been good, because the people who hate it are being extremely annoying about it. 4/10
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
That post was supposed to be my masterpiece but I fucked it up.
So, I guess it's super appropriate for the Oppenheimer thread, come to think of it!
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
I still appreciate the effort joe
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47968
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
Ben Stiller should have played Oppy
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
Thank you friendChris_H_2 wrote:I still appreciate the effort joe
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
I watched it today in IMAX and liked it much better! And I did so before reading Joe's review so I'm not just trying to contradict him
Maybe it's because I knew what to expect, or maybe I was in a crummy mood the first time around, or maybe it was seeing it in the correct aspect ratio... I liked it about 50% more
Or maybe I just like disagreeing with Joe
Maybe it's because I knew what to expect, or maybe I was in a crummy mood the first time around, or maybe it was seeing it in the correct aspect ratio... I liked it about 50% more
Or maybe I just like disagreeing with Joe
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
It’s a challenging movie for sure; but that’s what makes it very interesting.
Like I said , it reminds me of JFK, another difficult great movie.
Like I said , it reminds me of JFK, another difficult great movie.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11808
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
I want to see it again, but I'll wait a couple weeks. It won't break my heart if I never get back around to it, though
Please consider voting for me
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
I wish it had narrowed its scope to the creation of the bomb and ended after his meeting with Truman. Some of Nolan's most nimble and expressive filmmaking around the immediate aftermath of the bombings, and would've been a gut punch to end there
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
All in all probably my favorite Nolan movie. Definitely way better than Tenet and Dunkirk
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
My favorite is Interstellar maybe.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
I need to think about my top 5
But yeah this one is stellar anyway
But yeah this one is stellar anyway
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Farmer John
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6459
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
The Prestige is number one, baby
I still need to see Oppenheimer.
I still need to see Oppenheimer.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER (2023)
I like this suggestion the most. I wonder if Nolan just saw RDJ doing his thing and focused on Strauss moreJorge wrote:I wish it had narrowed its scope to the creation of the bomb and ended after his meeting with Truman. Some of Nolan's most nimble and expressive filmmaking around the immediate aftermath of the bombings, and would've been a gut punch to end there