NYT wrote:Two law professors active in the Federalist Society wrote that the original meaning of the 14th Amendment makes Donald Trump ineligible to hold government office.
The clause states that "no person shall be a senator or representative in Congress, or elector of president and vice president, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
"Trump is disqualified from holding any public office, including the office of the president, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment."
this mfer is banned
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
When it would benefit the Republicans, this court has and will continue to interpret the 14th Amendment based upon what they think the original drafters thought.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
B wrote:When it would benefit the Republicans, this court has and will continue to interpret the 14th Amendment based upon what they think the original drafters thought.
Like in Ashcroft and Obergefell?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
It's too bad Vivek can't win because this approach really resonates with red team folks who don't want Trump but will refuse to vote for Biden on partisan grounds.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
B wrote:When it would benefit the Republicans, this court has and will continue to interpret the 14th Amendment based upon what they think the original drafters thought.
Like in Ashcroft and Obergefell?
When I say "this court," I am referring to the Alito Court.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Chris Christie should be going on an aggressive pharmaceutical weight loss pill regimen
if he wasn’t morbidly obese he would likely poll much better
he should be sprinkling pills on his ice cream like m&m’s
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
elliseamos wrote:More charismatic than RFK & DeSantis seems like a low bar.
But when’s is the last time you heard a presidential candidate actually answer the asked question? Vivek would shred Biden or Puddin’ fingies on stage.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Like when Paul Ryan would go full wonk on people with his big blue eyes.
there is still time
for nickelback to play an inauguration ball
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
