or by showing her titstheplatypus wrote:Another thought: Janelle Monae can grow to become one of these if she finally manages to break on through and land a pop hit.
Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42766
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
¨We really underestimated Tay-Tay¨
Who is the we?
Who is the we?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Boomer music enjoyed a long shelf life because it was lucrative to keep on promoting it for decades. The audience was vast and nostalgic. The medium was physical media, and physical media was always developing new formats you could resell in. A television appearance on the right program could be a cultural event that almost everyone was exposed to. And the pop music explosion sucked the interest clean out of any of the music that came before it. The field was as wide open as it gets, and the audience was continually spending.
Nothing that came after it will have the shelf life that it had. And I fully expect to live long enough to see a time when almost no one under the age of 50 gives two shits about the Beatles, or the Stones, or The Clash, or any of that, either. It was fascinates me the way we aggrandize the longevity of these things that happenedin less than a lifetime ago.
Nothing that came after it will have the shelf life that it had. And I fully expect to live long enough to see a time when almost no one under the age of 50 gives two shits about the Beatles, or the Stones, or The Clash, or any of that, either. It was fascinates me the way we aggrandize the longevity of these things that happened
Last edited by McParadigm on Tue August 29, 2023 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
(patriotic choking noises)
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35446
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
i think people will give a shit about The Beatles for a long time.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Toad the Wet Sprocket
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42766
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
I think music is timeless. The market is always changing, the industry is always changing. But we are still listening to Miles, reading Beethoven, producing studio music like The Beatles.McParadigm wrote:Boomer music enjoyed a long shelf life because it was lucrative to keep on promoting it for decades. The audience was vast and nostalgic. The medium was physical media, and physical media was always developing new formats you could resell in. A television appearance on the right program could be a cultural event that almost everyone was exposed to. And the pop music explosion sucked the interest clean out of any of the music that came before it. The field was as wide open as it gets, and the audience was continually spending.
Nothing that came after it will have the shelf life that it had. And I fully expect to live long enough to see a time when almost no one under the age of 50 gives two shits about the Beatles, or the Stones, or The Clash, or any of that, either. It was fascinates me the way we aggrandize the longevity of these things that happenedinless than a lifetime ago.
I do agree that it seems eveyrthing is quicker, the pace is fast, now everyone releases singles or short albums and they need to release something again soon in order to still be relevant for the market.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84848
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
VinylGuy wrote:¨We really underestimated Tay-Tay¨
Who is the we?
VinylGuy wrote:there are some wrong choices..i mean taylor swift?
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42766
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84848
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Miles and the Beatles made their best records less than a lifetime ago. Even Duke Ellington’s most famous works are barely 90 years old.VinylGuy wrote:I think music is timeless. The market is always changing, the industry is always changing. But we are still listening to Miles, reading Beethoven, producing studio music like The Beatles.
We talk about pop music like it has a demonstrated capability for longevity, when it hasn’t even begun to take the test. It’s all transient, and it all should be. None of the things you loved will long survive you, because that’s not what they’re here to do.
(patriotic choking noises)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Anyways, I’m great fun at parties. Invite me anytime.
(patriotic choking noises)
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42766
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
whats their mission?McParadigm wrote:Miles and the Beatles made their best records less than a lifetime ago. Even Duke Ellington’s most famous works are barely 90 years old.VinylGuy wrote:I think music is timeless. The market is always changing, the industry is always changing. But we are still listening to Miles, reading Beethoven, producing studio music like The Beatles.
We talk about pop music like it has a demonstrated capability for longevity, when it hasn’t even begun to take the test. It’s all transient, and it all should be. None of the things you loved will long survive you, because that’s not what they’re here to do.
i dont see Ellington or Miles going away soon. You left Beethoven out of this conversation...
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36489
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Let's stuff McP in a locker
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
They’re here for you to love them now. That’s the whole game.VinylGuy wrote:whats their mission?We talk about pop music like it has a demonstrated capability for longevity, when it hasn’t even begun to take the test. It’s all transient, and it all should be. None of the things you loved will long survive you, because that’s not what they’re here to do.
(patriotic choking noises)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
The year is 2123. A young man sits waiting for the skybus with his friends. They are debating Pet Sounds against Sgt Peppers…a conversation that carried over from the night before. He wonders what the next Star War will be about, and what joy is.Jorge wrote:Let's stuff McP in a locker
(patriotic choking noises)
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45826
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Swift's rise coincided with the rise of beige.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42766
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Star Wars will be there for sureMcParadigm wrote:The year is 2123. A young man sits waiting for the skybus with his friends. They are debating Pet Sounds against Sgt Peppers…a conversation that carried over from the night before. He wonders what the next Star War will be about, and what joy is.Jorge wrote:Let's stuff McP in a locker
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10372
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
I am not sure whether this has turned into a deep philosophical discussion on the passage of time, or if we’re just tripping a little to hard. One thing we could use is Marty McFly fixing the flux capacitor so we can get an answer to these and other important questions…like in 2123 is the internet still filled with memes extolling Michael Jordan as the greatest ever or will the descendants of those folks finally give LeBron his due?
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"
Michael Jordan will be there for sure
(patriotic choking noises)