Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by Chris_H_2 »

theplatypus wrote:Another thought: Janelle Monae can grow to become one of these if she finally manages to break on through and land a pop hit.
or by showing her tits
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by VinylGuy »

¨We really underestimated Tay-Tay¨

Who is the we?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by McParadigm »

Boomer music enjoyed a long shelf life because it was lucrative to keep on promoting it for decades. The audience was vast and nostalgic. The medium was physical media, and physical media was always developing new formats you could resell in. A television appearance on the right program could be a cultural event that almost everyone was exposed to. And the pop music explosion sucked the interest clean out of any of the music that came before it. The field was as wide open as it gets, and the audience was continually spending.

Nothing that came after it will have the shelf life that it had. And I fully expect to live long enough to see a time when almost no one under the age of 50 gives two shits about the Beatles, or the Stones, or The Clash, or any of that, either. It was fascinates me the way we aggrandize the longevity of these things that happened in less than a lifetime ago.
Last edited by McParadigm on Tue August 29, 2023 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by spike »

i think people will give a shit about The Beatles for a long time.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by 96583UP »

Toad the Wet Sprocket
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by VinylGuy »

McParadigm wrote:Boomer music enjoyed a long shelf life because it was lucrative to keep on promoting it for decades. The audience was vast and nostalgic. The medium was physical media, and physical media was always developing new formats you could resell in. A television appearance on the right program could be a cultural event that almost everyone was exposed to. And the pop music explosion sucked the interest clean out of any of the music that came before it. The field was as wide open as it gets, and the audience was continually spending.

Nothing that came after it will have the shelf life that it had. And I fully expect to live long enough to see a time when almost no one under the age of 50 gives two shits about the Beatles, or the Stones, or The Clash, or any of that, either. It was fascinates me the way we aggrandize the longevity of these things that happened in less than a lifetime ago.
I think music is timeless. The market is always changing, the industry is always changing. But we are still listening to Miles, reading Beethoven, producing studio music like The Beatles.

I do agree that it seems eveyrthing is quicker, the pace is fast, now everyone releases singles or short albums and they need to release something again soon in order to still be relevant for the market.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:¨We really underestimated Tay-Tay¨

Who is the we?
VinylGuy wrote:there are some wrong choices..i mean taylor swift?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by VinylGuy »

it was a joke yeez
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by epilogue »

:lol:
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by McParadigm »

VinylGuy wrote:I think music is timeless. The market is always changing, the industry is always changing. But we are still listening to Miles, reading Beethoven, producing studio music like The Beatles.
Miles and the Beatles made their best records less than a lifetime ago. Even Duke Ellington’s most famous works are barely 90 years old.

We talk about pop music like it has a demonstrated capability for longevity, when it hasn’t even begun to take the test. It’s all transient, and it all should be. None of the things you loved will long survive you, because that’s not what they’re here to do.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by McParadigm »

Anyways, I’m great fun at parties. Invite me anytime.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by VinylGuy »

McParadigm wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I think music is timeless. The market is always changing, the industry is always changing. But we are still listening to Miles, reading Beethoven, producing studio music like The Beatles.
Miles and the Beatles made their best records less than a lifetime ago. Even Duke Ellington’s most famous works are barely 90 years old.

We talk about pop music like it has a demonstrated capability for longevity, when it hasn’t even begun to take the test. It’s all transient, and it all should be. None of the things you loved will long survive you, because that’s not what they’re here to do.
whats their mission?

i dont see Ellington or Miles going away soon. You left Beethoven out of this conversation...
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by Jorge »

Let's stuff McP in a locker
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by McParadigm »

VinylGuy wrote:
We talk about pop music like it has a demonstrated capability for longevity, when it hasn’t even begun to take the test. It’s all transient, and it all should be. None of the things you loved will long survive you, because that’s not what they’re here to do.
whats their mission?
They’re here for you to love them now. That’s the whole game.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by McParadigm »

Jorge wrote:Let's stuff McP in a locker
The year is 2123. A young man sits waiting for the skybus with his friends. They are debating Pet Sounds against Sgt Peppers…a conversation that carried over from the night before. He wonders what the next Star War will be about, and what joy is.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by BurtReynolds »

Swift's rise coincided with the rise of beige.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by VinylGuy »

McParadigm wrote:
Jorge wrote:Let's stuff McP in a locker
The year is 2123. A young man sits waiting for the skybus with his friends. They are debating Pet Sounds against Sgt Peppers…a conversation that carried over from the night before. He wonders what the next Star War will be about, and what joy is.
Star Wars will be there for sure
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10372
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by liebzz »

I am not sure whether this has turned into a deep philosophical discussion on the passage of time, or if we’re just tripping a little to hard. One thing we could use is Marty McFly fixing the flux capacitor so we can get an answer to these and other important questions…like in 2123 is the internet still filled with memes extolling Michael Jordan as the greatest ever or will the descendants of those folks finally give LeBron his due?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Rolling Stone name Pearl Jam a "New Immortal"

Post by McParadigm »

Michael Jordan will be there for sure
(patriotic choking noises)
Post Reply