The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Haha Burt had to do car karaoke.
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
i can't stop thinking about this.tragabigzanda wrote:It’s definitely Joy Behar. She co-hosts The View and I’m pretty sure Dev did whippets with her when she skied BC.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Here’s one:
We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.
So is her complaint valid?
We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.
So is her complaint valid?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- oasisfan35
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
I'd say her complaint is valid but I find the overall similar to declining a penalty in football.wease wrote:Here’s one:
We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.
So is her complaint valid?
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
-
pepperwhiteMFC
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Hopefully she gets well soon.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Bammer has no idea what STI iswease wrote:Here’s one:
We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.
So is her complaint valid?
(she/him/theirs)
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Sexually Transmitted Infection. What we used to call STD.Bammer wrote:Bammer has no idea what STI iswease wrote:Here’s one:
We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.
So is her complaint valid?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Sounds like that ungrateful slut doesn’t know what’s good for herwease wrote:Sexually Transmitted Infection. What we used to call STD.Bammer wrote:Bammer has no idea what STI iswease wrote:Here’s one:
We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.
So is her complaint valid?
(she/him/theirs)
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
If the result was reported back to her insurance it's totally understandable to be pissed.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Results have to be entered into charts or we can’t bill for the testing.Bi_3 wrote:If the result was reported back to her insurance it's totally understandable to be pissed.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
What’s Professor Kershnar think?
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
wat
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
I googled the guy and it has something to do with pedophiles.
Spike is apparently very familiar.
Spike is apparently very familiar.
(she/him/theirs)
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7386
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
just some subtle thread integration palBammer wrote:I googled the guy and it has something to do with pedophiles.
Spike is apparently very familiar.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Oh it was our fault, no doubt.Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15599
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
you may as well just screen grab and print this page and slap an "EXHIBIT A" sticker on the bottom.wease wrote:Oh it was our fault, no doubt.Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
I’ve said from the get go we did it by mistake.Chris_H_2 wrote:you may as well just screen grab and print this page and slap an "EXHIBIT A" sticker on the bottom.wease wrote:Oh it was our fault, no doubt.Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Looks like all she’s wanting is her lab bill to be fixed. Should be an easy enough process however, we don’t own the lab or anything so it’s not as simple as me saying “do away with these charges.”
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
-
pepperwhiteMFC
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Life is so frickin complicated.