The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post Reply
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11939
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by The Argonaut »

ouch
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35957
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by spike »

Haha Burt had to do car karaoke.
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19190
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by dad »

tragabigzanda wrote:It’s definitely Joy Behar. She co-hosts The View and I’m pretty sure Dev did whippets with her when she skied BC.
i can't stop thinking about this.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40668
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by wease »

Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
oasisfan35
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4780
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by oasisfan35 »

wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?
I'd say her complaint is valid but I find the overall similar to declining a penalty in football.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
pepperwhiteMFC
AnalLog
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by pepperwhiteMFC »

Hopefully she gets well soon.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by Bammer »

wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?
Bammer has no idea what STI is
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40668
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by wease »

Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?
Bammer has no idea what STI is
Sexually Transmitted Infection. What we used to call STD.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by Bammer »

wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?
Bammer has no idea what STI is
Sexually Transmitted Infection. What we used to call STD.
Sounds like that ungrateful slut doesn’t know what’s good for her
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by Bi_3 »

If the result was reported back to her insurance it's totally understandable to be pissed.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40668
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by wease »

Bi_3 wrote:If the result was reported back to her insurance it's totally understandable to be pissed.
Results have to be entered into charts or we can’t bill for the testing.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35957
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by spike »

What’s Professor Kershnar think?
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40668
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by wease »

wat
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by Bammer »

I googled the guy and it has something to do with pedophiles.

Spike is apparently very familiar.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7385
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by Peeps »

could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35957
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by spike »

Bammer wrote:I googled the guy and it has something to do with pedophiles.

Spike is apparently very familiar.
just some subtle thread integration pal
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40668
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by wease »

Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Oh it was our fault, no doubt.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15598
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by Chris_H_2 »

wease wrote:
Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Oh it was our fault, no doubt.
you may as well just screen grab and print this page and slap an "EXHIBIT A" sticker on the bottom.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40668
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by wease »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
wease wrote:
Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault
Oh it was our fault, no doubt.
you may as well just screen grab and print this page and slap an "EXHIBIT A" sticker on the bottom.
I’ve said from the get go we did it by mistake.

Looks like all she’s wanting is her lab bill to be fixed. Should be an easy enough process however, we don’t own the lab or anything so it’s not as simple as me saying “do away with these charges.”
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
pepperwhiteMFC
AnalLog
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am

Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread

Post by pepperwhiteMFC »

Life is so frickin complicated.
Post Reply