Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

You Know What To Do!

Getaway
42
13%
Mind Your Manners
8
2%
My Father's Son
38
12%
Sirens
23
7%
Lightning Bolt
21
6%
Infallible
38
12%
Pendulum
88
27%
Swallowed Whole
21
6%
Let the Records Play
7
2%
Sleeping By Myself
7
2%
Yellow Moon
32
10%
Future Days
4
1%
 
Total votes: 329

User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by ABNorman »

Yeah, that Pitchfork review had some very valid points.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stupidmop »

while the album’s centerpiece ballads tread on odious Lite-FM territory and forcefully tip the scales from poignant to maudlin, whether it’s the Goo Goo Dolls sheen of “Sirens” or the Hornsby-esque piano rolls of the closing “Future Days” (
Someone else hears the googoo dolls on sirens! Yay, or maybe :(
Pearl Jam on record have essentially been reduced to the rock ‘n’ roll version of wearing sweatpants: they’ve given up trying to impress anyone, so they may as well be comfortable. 
:lol:


They're right though :|
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Lament wrote:I Am Mine, Light Years, Love Boat Captain, Cropduster, Insignificance, & Grievance all have good to great choruses. Choruses I would take over anything on S/T or Backspacer (and time will tell if Lightning Bolt can be added to that). Choruses that provide emotional climaxes and releases that I look forward to with every listen. Choruses that stick with me without being cloying or overwrought, ones that stay impactful on repeated listens over years & years.

Sonic torture...

:haha:
Light years is one of my textbook cases of how to suck the emotional weight out of a song. Probably because of the chorus. Cropduster is a good chorus in a song I have no emotional attachment to.

Those other 3 are great, even though I agree with release_me that those two records are unnecessarily ponderous
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Lament wrote:The best part is his handle is from a song whose strengths are derived less from the chorus than possibly any other song in the entire Pearl Jam catalog.
The chorus in release is probably the best part of that song, but all the parts are great so why argue? :)
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Wowsers.
So the competition I'm a finalist in to see Pj in Seattle has had something added to it.
You get a tour of PjHQ on the day of the show.

Man I'd love to see just the practice space. It's all come from in there.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Heathen wrote:
Mike wrote:Obligatory negative pitchfork review
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/186 ... ning-bolt/
*mixed
It was a perfectly fine review. They didn't like it much, but it wasn't a hatchet piece
track11
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 12:35 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by track11 »

I don't think that Pitchfork PJ reviews are "wrong", but you know they are going to be negative. They have their favorites...can I write a negative review about the last National? Sure, I think it is boring, doesn't move the chains from High Violet, etc. It gets an 8.4 "BEST NEW MUSIC" from Pitchfork. Even if I agree with their points on this review, I still think that THE MUSIC IS GOOD. They always spend their time with PJ albums not necessarily evaluating the music but instead critiquing the lack of a move to completely new territory. It is a valid critique, but one they for some reason obsess over with PJ, and I would argue that there is a lot of new territory on LB (for Pearl Jam). Is it groundbreaking? No, but was Riot Act groundbreaking? Binaural? Yield certainly was not. Vitalogy? I don't get why we expect that from this band. They aren't Radiohead and never will be.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

dimejinky99 wrote:Wowsers.
So the competition I'm a finalist in to see Pj in Seattle has had something added to it.
You get a tour of PjHQ on the day of the show.

Man I'd love to see just the practice space. It's all come from in there.
Good luck, dime!
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by McParadigm »

Hahaha. Pitchfork, of all places, nails Pearl Jam better than 5,000 pages of PJ Chat, and the actual digital content is almost as funny as all of our bullshit ideas.

What was I thinking, going to sleep????
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by fishbob »

Yeah Pitchfork reviews are just so fucking self-righteous
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16298
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

track11 wrote:I don't think that Pitchfork PJ reviews are "wrong", but you know they are going to be negative. They have their favorites...can I write a negative review about the last National? Sure, I think it is boring, doesn't move the chains from High Violet, etc. It gets an 8.4 "BEST NEW MUSIC" from Pitchfork. Even if I agree with their points on this review, I still think that THE MUSIC IS GOOD. They always spend their time with PJ albums not necessarily evaluating the music but instead critiquing the lack of a move to completely new territory. It is a valid critique, but one they for some reason obsess over with PJ, and I would argue that there is a lot of new territory on LB (for Pearl Jam). Is it groundbreaking? No, but was Riot Act groundbreaking? Binaural? Yield certainly was not. Vitalogy? I don't get why we expect that from this band. They aren't Radiohead and never will be.
The review was obviously written by a fan in this case.

I Googled, the same writer penned a very complimentary review of the band's Toronto 2009 show.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Thejambi »

Heathen wrote:
fishbob wrote:
Release_Me wrote:
Mike wrote:There are so many different things so enjoy in music aside from the vocal melodies. Even songs completely lacking a vocal melody can be enjoyable! Fascinating, I know. For a Pearl Jam example: See the verses of Push Me, Pull Me or the three Binaural instrumentals.
I hope I'm not being misinterpreted. My beef isn't with dark Pearl Jam. Ten, Vs and Vitalogy are my favourite albums and they have their fair share of darkness. Dark songs can be melodic as many of those are. Bright songs can also be melodic. There is no mutually exclusive rule there. My beef is with the middle period albums which have all the darkness (maybe more) of early PJ but none of the melody (to my ears). I would love Sleight of Hand if atmosphere alone was enough for me. It's just not. Vocals and melody are what make or break songs for me. You can be different in that you'll listen to something repeatedly for it's other musical aspects. I probably won't.
I have a pretty big problem with this statement right here.
Yeah me too. I don't see how SoH has no melody.
In fairness it is a pretty weak melody.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
Mike
Future Drummer
Posts: 3130
Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Mike »

stip wrote:
Heathen wrote:
Mike wrote:Obligatory negative pitchfork review
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/186 ... ning-bolt/
*mixed
It was a perfectly fine review. They didn't like it much, but it wasn't a hatchet piece
Yeah, the review itself is fair. I was just joking about them giving a Pearl Jam album something around 5 points for the fourth time in a row.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

stip wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Wowsers.
So the competition I'm a finalist in to see Pj in Seattle has had something added to it.
You get a tour of PjHQ on the day of the show.

Man I'd love to see just the practice space. It's all come from in there.
Good luck, dime!

Thanks man!! I'm told the competition just got serious.
Up to now its been these 'I like ten' people. Apparently a guy got through yesterday and he's a Pj knowledge ninja. Im shitting now. No idea what the elimination process will entail.
Gonna learn track lists studio engineers sales figures etc. just in case.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by ABNorman »

dimejinky99 wrote:
stip wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Wowsers.
So the competition I'm a finalist in to see Pj in Seattle has had something added to it.
You get a tour of PjHQ on the day of the show.

Man I'd love to see just the practice space. It's all come from in there.
Good luck, dime!

Thanks man!! I'm told the competition just got serious.
Up to now its been these 'I like ten' people. Apparently a guy got through yesterday and he's a Pj knowledge ninja. Im shitting now. No idea what the elimination process will entail.
Gonna learn track lists studio engineers sales figures etc. just in case.
*fade in Eye of the Tiger Montage
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Actually laughed:)

Something like that yeah. Better get studying.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stupidmop »

Thejambi wrote:
Heathen wrote:
fishbob wrote:
Release_Me wrote:
Mike wrote:There are so many different things so enjoy in music aside from the vocal melodies. Even songs completely lacking a vocal melody can be enjoyable! Fascinating, I know. For a Pearl Jam example: See the verses of Push Me, Pull Me or the three Binaural instrumentals.
I hope I'm not being misinterpreted. My beef isn't with dark Pearl Jam. Ten, Vs and Vitalogy are my favourite albums and they have their fair share of darkness. Dark songs can be melodic as many of those are. Bright songs can also be melodic. There is no mutually exclusive rule there. My beef is with the middle period albums which have all the darkness (maybe more) of early PJ but none of the melody (to my ears). I would love Sleight of Hand if atmosphere alone was enough for me. It's just not. Vocals and melody are what make or break songs for me. You can be different in that you'll listen to something repeatedly for it's other musical aspects. I probably won't.
I have a pretty big problem with this statement right here.
Yeah me too. I don't see how SoH has no melody.
In fairness it is a pretty weak melody.
While I was drrrriiiiiiiffftttttiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnn
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

so when the countdown ended, was that video of the Vinyl the only new thing we got?
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by stupidmop »

I vote in all further discussion current-day pearl jam is referred to as 'The sweatpants Years, as produced by Brenden O'Brien'.

TSYAPBBOB for short.

Or maybe just pants, for short.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

stupidmop wrote:I vote in all further discussion current-day pearl jam is referred to as 'The sweatpants Years, as produced by Brenden O'Brien'.

TSYAPBBOB for short.

Or maybe just pants, for short.
:lol: that was my favorite pare of the article
Post Reply