Women's Health Issues

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 5:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by Bi_3 »

Peeps wrote:didnt ron say last night during the debate that the pro-choice laws enacted have nothing to do with the republican stance on being pro-life?

They may have found the tiny path to thread the issue:


Probably too late for anyone to take it seriously though.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by wease »

She’s actually the strongest candidate the GOP has. Too bad she’s a woman.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I think Haley would give Biden a strong competition. But like wease said, she’s a woman. Not even being able to claim electing the first woman president is enough for old white republicans to actually do it.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 5:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by Strat »

tragabigzanda wrote:Hot take: A few stalwart evangelical states will continue to block access for decades, while others will restructure abortion access from the bottom up, with broad voter support. So if you're a poor Black girl in Alabama, your limitations to body autonomy will be more a function of your socioeconomic standing than conservative Supreme Court rule, ergo equitable economic development continues to be the best path towards freedom and dignity for marginalized people.

The Supreme Court dismantled Roe. States are restoring it one by one.
Support for abortion cuts across party lines, performing significantly better at the ballot box than Biden and other Democrats.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/0 ... s-00126225

Break up with your major bank! Put your savings, checking, and CDs into impact-oriented banks that deploy their capital holdings into progressively minded private businesses!
Marginalized people definitely have the means for this!
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 5:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by McParadigm »

tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley
She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by Bi_3 »

McParadigm wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley
She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.

Do you have thoughts on or have you seen polls that reflect a Trumpless ticket? He's not exactly selling out stadiums anymore. It could be that the red team is defaulting to him because they are lemmings and not because they would stay home if he wasnt on the ballot.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by McParadigm »

Bi_3 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley
She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.

Do you have thoughts on or have you seen polls that reflect a Trumpless ticket? He's not exactly selling out stadiums anymore. It could be that the red team is defaulting to him because they are lemmings and not because they would stay home if he wasnt on the ballot.
I think it’s impossible to predict how that scenario plays out in reality. So many factors would be involved in determining the outcome…chief among them: “why or how did Donald Trump leave the race?”
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by wease »

McParadigm wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:I think their best realistic strategy is to run Haley
She currently has what is easily the most momentum of anybody polling at 16% or less in the Republican primary.

Do you have thoughts on or have you seen polls that reflect a Trumpless ticket? He's not exactly selling out stadiums anymore. It could be that the red team is defaulting to him because they are lemmings and not because they would stay home if he wasnt on the ballot.
I think it’s impossible to predict how that scenario plays out in reality. So many factors would be involved in determining the outcome…chief among them: “why or how did Donald Trump leave the race?”
Death would be the most preferable.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by Bammer »

It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by wease »

Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on
You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by Bammer »

wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on
You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.
This explains most of it. But how many pro-life women out there base their vote on this single issue? A lot.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by wease »

Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on
You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.
This explains most of it. But how many pro-life women out there base their vote on this single issue? A lot.
I would venture that a lot of voters, maybe even the majority, base their votes on one particular issue. MAGA notwithstanding. Well maybe even MAGA. Trump would be the one issue there, I guess.
Not everyone takes the time to learn about multiple issues and then they hear or see that one bullet point they either really agree or disagree with and that’s the hill to live or die on.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35445
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by spike »

wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on
You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.
When that party talks about things they want, they only mean for the male population.
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by Peeps »

Bammer wrote:
wease wrote:
Bammer wrote:It is fucking WILD to me that this is the issue so many people base their vote on
You have to keep in mind this is an issue that, while doesn’t really have much to do with you, affects what, half the population of our nation? As men, it may not seem as important to us. But for women, it’s a very personal thing. I totally get it.

What’s laughable is the party that professes to want LESS government is the party that wants to intrude itself into the personal lives of the female population.
This explains most of it. But how many pro-life women out there base their vote on this single issue? A lot.
how many people base their vote wether there is a R or D attached to the candidate?
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/11/us/texas ... index.html

I guess we're about to see how legal the Texas abortion prosecution laws really are. Hopefully she'll go to Canada so they can't prosecute any doctors that help her, but it is pretty clear they will prosecute her for the abortion once she returns to Texas. Imagine having to get a politician's permission to have a procedure. And this is a woman who wants to have kids.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by wease »

How can they prosecute a doctor in another state as long as it’s legal in that state?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Women's Health Issues

Post by wease »

And furthermore, wouldn’t anyone outside of her medical care knowing about her abortion be a huge HIPPA violation?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
Post Reply