2024 Tour Rumors and Speculation

[mkay0]

Any of these rumors sourced back to people who have leaked things in the past? This feels insane considering what we have seen from them recently

[Monkey_Driven]

Any of these rumors sourced back to people who have leaked things in the past? This feels insane considering what we have seen from them recently

I believe this list is from one of the same sources that has correctly leaked tour dates in the past.

[spike]

While the members of PJ obv have a lot of money, it can be all relative, so it’s possible they are finally ready for a big touring year to offset any losses during the pandemic when they either couldn’t tour, touring extensively was a challenge, or weren’t comforting touring extensively.

Also, they may be doing so many dates for their crew so they can get paid. That’s a band responsibility often overlooked.

[tragabigzanda]

pearl jam sucks now

[Birds in Hell]

Well that's alright.

Those in WA and SA might disagree.

That'll change. There's no way they'd only do 7 shows across AUS/NZ with 2x 2 night stands.

I feel like it could easily be true.

Coming down here seems like a holiday trip for the band, I can see them just doing a handful of gigantic shows in a few spots on the East Coast.

I don't know if I'd travel for 2024 Pearl Jam, guess I'll have to see how I feel about it at the time.

[E.H. Ruddock]

please no baseball stadiums

[Bi_3]

So they did play a bunch of shows in 2022. This might not be far off

[Monkey_Driven]

THIS IS HOW PEARL JAM SHOULD TOUR NOW:

1. A series of small, premium priced shows at intimate venues (think Benaroya Hall). Ticket prices are like $400 each, and portions of every sale benefits local charities. They do an acoustic set followed by a rawk set.

2. They do a limited number of economy priced shows in all the major markets so average joe can attend. Tix are $100 and they prohibit flex pricing.

So they would do like four small, pricey benefit shows in the Northeast, followed by a three-night stand at MSG. Rinse and repeat around the country.

I like the model they've done the past two years. Play the US every year (or close to every year), but choose two regions and play 6-10 dates in each region. That way each region has multiple options for seeing a show every 3-4 years.

As a Midwesterner, I don't like the new trend of playing multiple shows in major cities only. I get all the reasons why an artist chooses to do this, but it can really make it hard for large swaths of the country to see a show for a reasonable price.

[tragabigzanda]

pearl jam sucks now

[dad]

THIS IS HOW PEARL JAM SHOULD TOUR NOW:

1. A series of small, premium priced shows at intimate venues (think Benaroya Hall). Ticket prices are like $400 each, and portions of every sale benefits local charities. They do an acoustic set followed by a rawk set.

2. They do a limited number of economy priced shows in all the major markets so average joe can attend. Tix are $100 and they prohibit flex pricing.

So they would do like four small, pricey benefit shows in the Northeast, followed by a three-night stand at MSG. Rinse and repeat around the country.

I like the model they've done the past two years. Play the US every year (or close to every year), but choose two regions and play 6-10 dates in each region. That way each region has multiple options for seeing a show every 3-4 years.

As a Midwesterner, I don't like the new trend of playing multiple shows in major cities only. I get all the reasons why an artist chooses to do this, but it can really make it hard for large swaths of the country to see a show for a reasonable price.

But wouldn’t you be well served by say, a $100 arena show in STL or maybe Chicago, and a $400 intimate show in KC?

$400 seems absurd tho...even for an intimate show.

[tragabigzanda]

pearl jam sucks now

[Monkey_Driven]

THIS IS HOW PEARL JAM SHOULD TOUR NOW:

1. A series of small, premium priced shows at intimate venues (think Benaroya Hall). Ticket prices are like $400 each, and portions of every sale benefits local charities. They do an acoustic set followed by a rawk set.

2. They do a limited number of economy priced shows in all the major markets so average joe can attend. Tix are $100 and they prohibit flex pricing.

So they would do like four small, pricey benefit shows in the Northeast, followed by a three-night stand at MSG. Rinse and repeat around the country.

I like the model they've done the past two years. Play the US every year (or close to every year), but choose two regions and play 6-10 dates in each region. That way each region has multiple options for seeing a show every 3-4 years.

As a Midwesterner, I don't like the new trend of playing multiple shows in major cities only. I get all the reasons why an artist chooses to do this, but it can really make it hard for large swaths of the country to see a show for a reasonable price.

But wouldn’t you be well served by say, a $100 arena show in STL or maybe Chicago, and a $400 intimate show in KC?

$400 seems absurd tho...even for an intimate show.

Tix for the most recent tour flexed to almost $800

Sure, but how many people actually paid that price? I wouldn't pay $400+ to see PJ. It's not Disney world.

[tragabigzanda]

pearl jam sucks now

[wease]

THIS IS HOW PEARL JAM SHOULD TOUR NOW:

1. A series of small, premium priced shows at intimate venues (think Benaroya Hall). Ticket prices are like $400 each, and portions of every sale benefits local charities. They do an acoustic set followed by a rawk set.

2. They do a limited number of economy priced shows in all the major markets so average joe can attend. Tix are $100 and they prohibit flex pricing.

So they would do like four small, pricey benefit shows in the Northeast, followed by a three-night stand at MSG. Rinse and repeat around the country.

I like the model they've done the past two years. Play the US every year (or close to every year), but choose two regions and play 6-10 dates in each region. That way each region has multiple options for seeing a show every 3-4 years.

As a Midwesterner, I don't like the new trend of playing multiple shows in major cities only. I get all the reasons why an artist chooses to do this, but it can really make it hard for large swaths of the country to see a show for a reasonable price.

But wouldn’t you be well served by say, a $100 arena show in STL or maybe Chicago, and a $400 intimate show in KC?

$400 seems absurd tho...even for an intimate show.

Tix for the most recent tour flexed to almost $800

Sure, but how many people actually paid that price? I wouldn't pay $400+ to see PJ. It's not Disney world.

But if you’re paying $100 plus travel to STL, you effectively are paying that much

Yeah, but that $100 you mention is now $400 PLUS the travel expenses.

[tragabigzanda]

pearl jam sucks now

[96583UP]

Any of these rumors sourced to black people who have leaked things in the past? This feels insane considering what we have seen from them recently

what the fuck man

[Simple Torture]

THIS IS HOW PEARL JAM SHOULD TOUR NOW:

1. A series of small, premium priced shows at intimate venues (think Benaroya Hall). Ticket prices are like $400 each, and portions of every sale benefits local charities. They do an acoustic set followed by a rawk set.

2. They do a limited number of economy priced shows in all the major markets so average joe can attend. Tix are $100 and they prohibit flex pricing.

So they would do like four small, pricey benefit shows in the Northeast, followed by a three-night stand at MSG. Rinse and repeat around the country.

[spike]

They’re never coming to Bozeman, trag.

[tragabigzanda]

pearl jam sucks now

[Anders]

Missoula would be my choice.