Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by dimejinky99 »

This is a comp but it’s just mindblowing
I get the dave argument now. I wanna see this band.
Unreal.

https://youtu.be/bdYzVYIiavY?si=JknHLr-rv22pcEBl
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by bodysnatcher »

If someone could please report back on how this sounds compared to the 2011 and OG pressings, much appreciated.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by 96583UP »

dimejinky99 wrote:This is a comp but it’s just mindblowing
I get the dave argument now. I wanna see this band.
Unreal.

https://youtu.be/bdYzVYIiavY?si=JknHLr-rv22pcEBl

:shock: YES
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by 96583UP »

from the band that has celebrated nostalgia and anniversaries to such an extreme they even celebrate anniversaries of anniversaries, they have….

totally omitted the essence of the 2 best touring years of their most famous period

Dave A is that essence

Krusen on Ten?

who F cares

I wanna see Dave A on Vs.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by hlniv »

96583UP wrote: who F cares

I wanna see Dave A on Vitalogy
I love me some Jack, but I want to see more of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui7RENNaXMc
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by 96583UP »

hlniv wrote:
96583UP wrote: who F cares

I wanna see Dave A on Vitalogy
I love me some Jack, but I want to see more of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui7RENNaXMc

yeeeahhhh boiiii
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by 96583UP »

now we're talkin
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by dimejinky99 »

Torched her from you to meeeee
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by Anders »

96583UP wrote:from the band that has celebrated nostalgia and anniversaries to such an extreme they even celebrate anniversaries of anniversaries, they have….

totally omitted the essence of the 2 best touring years of their most famous period

Dave A is that essence

Krusen on Ten?

who F cares

I wanna see Dave A on Vs.
In 2024.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42771
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by VinylGuy »

as much as i love those years i rarely chose a boot from 93-94

Im more inclined to listen to something with Jack or Matt
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Vitalogist
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri October 27, 2023 1:30 pm

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by Vitalogist »

VinylGuy wrote:as much as i love those years i rarely chose a boot from 93-94

Im more inclined to listen to something with Jack or Matt
Same here.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by Bammer »

VinylGuy wrote:as much as i love those years i rarely chose a boot from 93-94

Im more inclined to listen to something with Jack or Matt
Would that be due to the much higher quality of the recordings in later years?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by 96583UP »

Dave A’s hair looks great in the SNL rehearsal

nice shine, conditioner
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
lecherouslittlestump
known prankster
Posts: 1115
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 10:39 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by lecherouslittlestump »

bodysnatcher wrote:If someone could please report back on how this sounds compared to the 2011 and OG pressings, much appreciated.
This is a pretty big remix, like ST a few years ago. I'm hearing things I never heard before. The new mix has propelled this album into my top 3 (it was previously my most hated Pearl Jim album)
"A man who doesn't spend time with the Jamily can never be a real man," - Don Corelone
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42771
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by VinylGuy »

Bammer wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:as much as i love those years i rarely chose a boot from 93-94

Im more inclined to listen to something with Jack or Matt
Would that be due to the much higher quality of the recordings in later years?
maybe but its mostly about not only the setlist but also the music.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Happy Trees
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 687
Joined: Sat April 22, 2023 2:59 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by Happy Trees »

96583UP wrote:Dave A’s hair looks great in the SNL rehearsal

nice shine, conditioner
:lol:
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by dimejinky99 »

Suck my toe vg
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)

Post by 96583UP »

Happy Trees wrote:
96583UP wrote:Dave A’s hair looks great in the SNL rehearsal

nice shine, conditioner
:lol:
by contrast, Ed’s hair had entered a very dry, frizzly, almost fro-ey phase

perhaps there is deeper symbolism to that than we ever realized

yin and yang

contrasting musical forces combining to form one balanced harmony

then eventually Ed saw Dave’s use of VO5 hot oil treatment as a step too far

and he had to remove him
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply