Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Bring back Dave A
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- joostone
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1779
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:02 am
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
96583UP wrote:Bring back Dave A

- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
that’s probably the bridge that made it too far to cross
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
a great deal of time has passed and would be great for them to hash it out
obv continuing to dwell on ‘that-Era’ Ed is not reasonable as that era has long passed
but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
maybe Stone can go in for an initial brunch meeting with an olive branch, bring things back full circle
that’s probably the bridge that made it too far to cross
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
a great deal of time has passed and would be great for them to hash it out
obv continuing to dwell on ‘that-Era’ Ed is not reasonable as that era has long passed
but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
maybe Stone can go in for an initial brunch meeting with an olive branch, bring things back full circle
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
it still seems so weird Dave is obsessed with that moment of his life
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
you mean when he was a part of the biggest band in the world making a crap ton of money? yeah, super strange to be obsessed about that.VinylGuy wrote:it still seems so weird Dave is obsessed with that moment of his life
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10372
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Stone should not invite Dave A. to any meals that could include eggs. It’s too soon.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Which would produce more revenue over the long haul?tragabigzanda wrote:I genuinely wonder if Dave sold his publishing stake at a discount at some point
I bet Ed is super pissed they did writing credits like that for those two albums.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
according to him, he has got nothing. He signed it all away when he was fired.tragabigzanda wrote:I genuinely wonder if Dave sold his publishing stake at a discount at some point
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
remember when PJ had the nerve to play Angel live without Dave
SOBs
shove it in the butthole
SOBs
shove it in the butthole
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Prob not the best decision…tragabigzanda wrote:Well that explains thingsStrat wrote:according to him, he has got nothing. He signed it all away when he was fired.tragabigzanda wrote:I genuinely wonder if Dave sold his publishing stake at a discount at some point
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
-
guitar_davey
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
to please the fans who haven't liked anything from pearl jam in 29 years?guitar_davey wrote:If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
guitar_davey
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
At the cost of his own enjoyment and sense of personal safety? Nah. Even that Instagram post above makes the guy look like a jackass.Strat wrote:to please the fans who haven't liked anything from pearl jam in 29 years?guitar_davey wrote:If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
- Vitalogist
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Fri October 27, 2023 1:30 pm
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Vs overall is a mixed bag for me, but there’s no denying the drumming is top notch
-
guitar_davey
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
Don't get me wrong, I love the records he drums on and I think he's an integral part of PJ's history.
But it's in the past. Leave it there.
But it's in the past. Leave it there.
- Happy Trees
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Sat April 22, 2023 2:59 am
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
It rarely happens, believe me. If anything, you find them to be worse, especially in the Trumpy climate we're living in now.tragabigzanda wrote: Agreed. There are people from my 20s who were really toxic personalities at the time. I'd like to think they've grown and evolved since then, but why would I ever go out of my way to find out?
And Dave clearly needs his binky. So...
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Vs. 30th Anniversary (Reissue, see page 3)
for someone whose m.o. is all about love and putting fixin on it maybe it would evidence emotional maturity to seek to make amendsguitar_davey wrote:At the cost of his own enjoyment and sense of personal safety? Nah. Even that Instagram post above makes the guy look like a jackass.Strat wrote:to please the fans who haven't liked anything from pearl jam in 29 years?guitar_davey wrote:If that's the case, why would EV want to have anything to do with the guy ever again?96583UP wrote:my guess is Ed must take exception to Dave A bc Dave A leaked stuff to that Five against one book about Ed personal stuff, and probably family stuff too
Ed had been going through crazy stalker stuff at that time and my guess is it all got filed in under ‘existential threat’
Again, based on the above info and the fact they're clearly just not aligned with the guy, why would he want to?96583UP wrote:but I do wonder if current-era Ed could do more to attempt to reach out and smooth things over
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone