B wrote:It's still going to be a long time before the Republicans let a woman run their party.
I won’t argue this. But just imagine it’s Haley.
Who is on the other side of that ballot?
If you’re suggesting that she would beat Joe Biden under conditions where she had full Republican support, I think that’s almost a foregone conclusion.
Not choosing that route is one of many ways the Republican Party is needlessly self-immolating…and an example of how the party’s external grief-targeting and absolute rejection of self-reflection is destructive to its cause. If everything is always someone else’s fault, then you learn no lessons.
Can’t decide between “same could be said about the Dems” and “bring back Dave a”
I mean, the same could be said about centrists, too. To some degree that’s a very human reaction to things. Everyone experiences some amount of that impulse. But neither the centrists nor the Democrats have let it talk them into rejecting a presidential candidate who would be a near-guaranteed win for one who tells them what they want to hear.
They rejected Bloomberg for some reason
Michael Bloomberg was a billionaire who tried to use his vast personal resources to secure a presidential bid. When his polling numbers didn’t qualify him for the early debates, the Democratic National Committee actively lobbied for him. When that led to him appearing onstage, it went so poorly that the otherwise-sympathetic New York Times ran a headline called How Bloomberg Bungled a Debate. A Monmouth poll from shortly before primary voting started found his like-ability ratings with registered voters to be middling at best. The same week, a Quinnipiac poll showed him performing worse against Trump than 3 of the other Democrat candidates in a head-to-head. Joe Biden was the far and away winner of that poll.
I would need you to explain to me how this is an example of what we are talking about.
we will wait a very long time another like him that can run that behemoth successfully
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Peeps wrote:i am so glad we are never allowed to change our minds over time
The term you’re searching for in this case is “dementia”
Its funny how now that Fetterman is largely recovered he’s suddenly moderate. Must be something about brain damage and leftism
But on topic, changing your mind on something does not mean you’ve come to a better conclusion. They idea that unfettered immigration is good is long dead outside progglism and businesses looking for easily exploited labor
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :
He’s CEO now. Gotta control that spending with half measures.
Inside us all live two wolves: one with a respectability kink obsessed with being the "adult in the room" and the other a petty little hater who revels in taking cheap shots
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Jorge wrote:Inside us all live two wolves: one with a respectability kink obsessed with being the "adult in the room" and the other a petty little hater who revels in taking cheap shots
Just your classic “one with a monocle and one with his hat on backwards” scenario
Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :
He’s CEO now. Gotta control that spending with half measures.
ANYWAY....
The Texas thing is turning into quite the event, itll be interesting to see how Biden responds to states openly rejecting federal direction:
States backing texas:
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :
Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :
there's no way that he remembers saying that
Peeps, your retort? Please try to keep little girls out of it by the way, perv.
