This is a perfect example of the nasal thing at its best. Good call!Ms Harmless wrote:yeah me too, the nasal-ness of No Code is glorious, "Smile" for example
I love the way he sings In My Tree on that Give Way live record. Another example.
This is a perfect example of the nasal thing at its best. Good call!Ms Harmless wrote:yeah me too, the nasal-ness of No Code is glorious, "Smile" for example
Agreed. I think Ed sounds very powerful in Comatose. he certainly doenst in MYMBirds in Hell wrote:Me too.Jorge wrote:I like the weird dueling guitar lines in "Comatose"
I also like the big crashing chords in the intro and chorus too.
It's maybe the only example of late-period Pearl Jam doing one of those 'high octane rockers' that actually works.
MYM is awful.
Birds in Hell wrote:I've lost track at this point, when is the single expected to be available?
Got Some wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:I've lost track at this point, when is the single expected to be available?
About 3:35PM for us in Adelaide to my calculations
It’s coming shortlyAnders wrote:Can the mods make a thread for the new single?
for me? there always wasBi_3 wrote:Ms Harmless wrote:yeah me too, the nasal-ness of No Code is glorious, "Smile" for example![]()
ms. harmless, we rarely see eye to eye but I've been digging your takes in this thread. So... there's hope?
To me comatose is head and shoulders above MYM, with SBWM in between. Actually SBWM has grown a lot on me since Gigaton came out.tragabigzanda wrote:You guys are arguing about some of the worst Pearl Jam songs
Quality > Quantity for me no matter the track length. I just want it to be a good song and the clips are promising.Ms Harmless wrote:guys what if this song is only 3 minutes long? that'll suck
it's got to travel somewhere for... 5 minutes at least
Sure, but let's take midtempo burners- this band seems to have a sweetspot in the 4 to 5 min zone (I haven't done any analysis, this is just what my memory says). These songs need time to breathe. Solo. Bridge. If we're lucky, second solo, a bit more unhinged, and then LET IT PLAY OUT (I'm looking at you, BO'B).Gigalogy84 wrote:Quality > Quantity for me no matter the track length. I just want it to be a good song and the clips are promising.Ms Harmless wrote:guys what if this song is only 3 minutes long? that'll suck
it's got to travel somewhere for... 5 minutes at least
Would guess 48 min.RockPusher wrote:I'm certainly nervous that the album will be short without a lot of long songs. Earthling is 13 songs and 48 minutes. If it were 11 songs, that would be right around the 40 minute mark. Hopefully I'm right about Watt understanding how critical the "jam" aspect of this band is, and he adjusts accordingly.