When I listen to him sing these days, I laugh... I can't help it... it sounds comical to me. I think it's the combination of intensity, struggle, and earnestness. It used to be so cool.guitar_davey wrote:To me, "laughably bad" is Vince Neil or Axl Rose. Eddie can still sing the hell out of plenty of PJ's catalogue.tree_ wrote:Yes, they were legendarily great. And the band still sounds pretty great. But Ed sounds laughably bad now, in mine and my wife's opinions, with all due respect to yours.
Dark Matter (song)
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20305
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Dark Matter (song)
-
guitar_davey
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Fair enough.tree_ wrote:When I listen to him sing these days, I laugh... I can't help it... it sounds comical to me. I think it's the combination of intensity, struggle, and earnestness. It used to be so cool.guitar_davey wrote:To me, "laughably bad" is Vince Neil or Axl Rose. Eddie can still sing the hell out of plenty of PJ's catalogue.tree_ wrote:Yes, they were legendarily great. And the band still sounds pretty great. But Ed sounds laughably bad now, in mine and my wife's opinions, with all due respect to yours.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Dark Matter (song)
indeedguitar_davey wrote:We're into that second decimal place huh?96583UP wrote:gonna put this at like a 3.47 today
song's a little dry
just sayin'
i like the tempo though
we're not quite at 3.5 today
maybe the laser beam effects are not impressing today? and feel like a cheap short-cut
they better wield that laser properly live
their ratings depend on it
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- Buby
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: West of Deedle
Re: Dark Matter (song)
I am invisible in hereJaeti wrote:And a cool vocal intro version, too.Ms Harmless wrote:somebody made one with twice the intro but I can't remember who
https://vocaroo.com/1d8T6zh3RN5i
- DDWJMUVW
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Wed December 13, 2023 9:44 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
96583UP wrote:gonna put this at like a 3.47 today
song's a little dry
just sayin'
i like the tempo though
I think I understand what you’re getting at by “dry” and I don’t necessarily disagree.
That said, I’m trying to assess it for what it is. Sometimes you just get a straight forward, simply structured (intro, verse, pre, chorus x 2, bridge, chorus, outro w solo) track that feels not complex but is still a really quality song.
Plenty of precedent here for this. To me, they nail most of the constituent parts, even if the structure is uncomplicated and routine.
I’m sure we will get weird, funky, odd time signatures etc elsewhere on the record.
"For me, it's all about the time we're having just playing the songs. So if it's kind of a mindless good time, then....."
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- oneway23
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am
Re: Dark Matter (song)
The mind boggles, yotragabigzanda wrote:So weird to me that people are spending pages arguing about a 60-year old guy’s declining voice but totally fine with a mixing/mastering job that will give the whole jamily tinnitus
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10615
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
This seems right on.guitar_davey wrote:MJD talking all the sense on this page. Master class in how to critique the boys' age (and even the decline) without being a dick about it.mikejasond wrote:Eddie Vedder IS Pearl Jam. Like, they are not the legendary band they are today without him. Is he at his peak as a vocalist? No. The younger Eddie's voice gives me chills and is maybe the greatest rock voice I've ever heard. He's not omg amazing anymore like he was once. And sometimes its frustrating to me too because I so want to hear that old voice. But you know, today, you stack Eddie against other singers as if you were hearing him for the first time and he's still really good. And Pearl Jam won't have Eddie retire because they know 90% of their appeal goes away when that happens. They are a good band but it's Eddie that makes them truly special, that has ALWAYS been the case.tree_ wrote:Wife Raz agrees with me and thinks the band sounds great. And sadly, Ed should retire. Just imagine say, Jack White in his place here. Could be quite great. I won't start saying "fire".![]()
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
We must evolve.guitar_davey wrote:We're into that second decimal place huh?96583UP wrote:gonna put this at like a 3.47 today
song's a little dry
just sayin'
i like the tempo though
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
yeah good post by mikejasond
I have always valued this band for having great musicians, especially Dave A when I was a young drummer, but what made PJ PJ and no other band is the tone and delivery of Ed's voice; that's still true, for better and for worse
I have always valued this band for having great musicians, especially Dave A when I was a young drummer, but what made PJ PJ and no other band is the tone and delivery of Ed's voice; that's still true, for better and for worse
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
it was Buby!Buby wrote:I am invisible in hereJaeti wrote:And a cool vocal intro version, too.Ms Harmless wrote:somebody made one with twice the intro but I can't remember who![]()
https://vocaroo.com/1d8T6zh3RN5i
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
yes, it's like a whispered threat, "we're coming for you", especially before that militaristic gunfire drum fill into the solo; it's this kind of attention to detail that made me fall for this band and so far we have it on the Dark Matter album as we did on Gigatonguitar_davey wrote:Similarly, I love the low key menace in his low register when he sings "No sorrow for the unaccountable"Walker Bait wrote:I love the way he delivers that part too. And also the line, "No one knows what's happening next!". It's aggressive but not in a forced way, it's organic, it's sincere. There's almost a sense of panic behind it, and I identify with that. It's relatable and relevant.Ms Harmless wrote:I love the way Ed sings "it's... strange... these days... well", some of that old nasality in his voice is back, and the way "well" comes down to a lower note again and is pushed just in front of the next snare note instead of falling with it; it's those little subtleties that I love about Pearl Jam and that kind of syncopated funky singing really does remind me of a song like "Go"
-
guitar_davey
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: Dark Matter (song)
If this wasn't Pearl Jam, I probably wouldn't really be into this song, but that's partly down to the fact that PJ was at the forefront of a movement of bombastic "alternative rock" bands that have been half-rate copied endlessly for the past thirty years and I can't stand those bands. If it was anybody else, it would be derivative of PJ anyway. But as it is, it *is* Pearl Jam and I'm loving it.DDWJMUVW wrote:96583UP wrote:gonna put this at like a 3.47 today
song's a little dry
just sayin'
i like the tempo though
I think I understand what you’re getting at by “dry” and I don’t necessarily disagree.
That said, I’m trying to assess it for what it is. Sometimes you just get a straight forward, simply structured (intro, verse, pre, chorus x 2, bridge, chorus, outro w solo) track that feels not complex but is still a really quality song.
Plenty of precedent here for this. To me, they nail most of the constituent parts, even if the structure is uncomplicated and routine.
I’m sure we will get weird, funky, odd time signatures etc elsewhere on the record.
Last edited by guitar_davey on Thu February 15, 2024 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
that!guitar_davey wrote:If this wasn't Pearl Jam, I probably wouldn't really be into this song, but that's partly down to the fact that PJ was at the forefront of a movement of bombastic "alternative rock" bands that have been half-rate copied endlessly for the past thirty years and I can't stand those bands. If it as anybody else, it would be derivative of PJ anyway. But as it is, it *is* Pearl Jam and I'm loving it.DDWJMUVW wrote:96583UP wrote:gonna put this at like a 3.47 today
song's a little dry
just sayin'
i like the tempo though
I think I understand what you’re getting at by “dry” and I don’t necessarily disagree.
That said, I’m trying to assess it for what it is. Sometimes you just get a straight forward, simply structured (intro, verse, pre, chorus x 2, bridge, chorus, outro w solo) track that feels not complex but is still a really quality song.
Plenty of precedent here for this. To me, they nail most of the constituent parts, even if the structure is uncomplicated and routine.
I’m sure we will get weird, funky, odd time signatures etc elsewhere on the record.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Pearl Jam have every permission they need from me to be "unoriginal" if the statement they're making, and making well, is "we helped make this sound in the first place"
- Hypnos
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: Mon February 04, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Well, this is the song with the Eddie snippet, two round instrumental intro and extended instrumental after the solo.
https://vocaroo.com/1iWISu79MC8p
https://vocaroo.com/1iWISu79MC8p
Bastard! Bastard! Bastard!
-
guitar_davey
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Hear hear!Ms Harmless wrote:Pearl Jam have every permission they need from me to be "unoriginal" if the statement they're making, and making well, is "we helped make this sound in the first place"
- Buby
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: West of Deedle
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Thanks dudeHypnosomnia wrote:Well, this is the song with the Eddie snippet, two round instrumental intro and extended instrumental after the solo.
https://vocaroo.com/1iWISu79MC8p
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
This is wonderful.Hypnosomnia wrote:Well, this is the song with the Eddie snippet, two round instrumental intro and extended instrumental after the solo.
https://vocaroo.com/1iWISu79MC8p
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Dark Matter (song)
was this done with AIBuby wrote:I am invisible in hereJaeti wrote:And a cool vocal intro version, too.Ms Harmless wrote:somebody made one with twice the intro but I can't remember who![]()
https://vocaroo.com/1d8T6zh3RN5i