Dark Matter (song)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Dark Matter Initial Reactions

5 Stars
33
17%
4 Stars
92
48%
3 Stars
56
29%
2 Stars
8
4%
1 Star
3
2%
 
Total votes: 192

User avatar
Val
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu December 07, 2023 9:27 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Val »

Buby wrote:
Val wrote: That name has a Romanian ring to it.
What's your thing with Romania Val?
I have a “thing” with Romania? :|
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

RockPusher wrote:Can we please have a new thread for technical production/mix stuff, so that the album and song threads can, you know, be ABOUT THE MUSIC?
If people have issue with sound quality, isn’t that about the music?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Jaeti »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
RockPusher wrote:Can we please have a new thread for technical production/mix stuff, so that the album and song threads can, you know, be ABOUT THE MUSIC?
If people have issue with sound quality, isn’t that about the music?
Uh oh.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Val wrote:
bluestate wrote:
stip wrote:i am certainly capable of enjoying something more or less with better production but the songwriting and performances are so far ahead in terms of what matters to me.
this x 1000%

I grew up exchanging cassette tapes and mixes of shitty recordings of punk, rock, metal, funk bands all throughout middle school. You ever listen to a tape that had 10 different albums recorded on it? Even when those crappy tapes started to get all warbly and hissy, that didn't detract from my ability to determine which bands I really connected with. As someone that now writes and records and mixes music as a hobby, I find most of this hand wringing tiresome. You either like a song or you don't... and if you don't, then why obsess over production minutiae?
Totally.

The focus on production isn’t the focusedness that people need to be focused on.

Big no-no.
You would have hated the original avocado album thread
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Jaeti wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
RockPusher wrote:Can we please have a new thread for technical production/mix stuff, so that the album and song threads can, you know, be ABOUT THE MUSIC?
If people have issue with sound quality, isn’t that about the music?
Uh oh.
I’m just a mod trying to figure out what would be best for the discussion around here
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Birds in Hell »

Mike wrote:Talking about why someone does not enjoy this song is okay! This does not have to lessen anyones enjoyment of this song! This is all okay and good!
Same old thing every new album cycle. Wouldn't high-fiving each other about how much the song rules get boring after a while?

Talking about the things people don't enjoy about the song, and identifying how and why, is an interesting conversation, or at least has the potential to be - arguably more interesting than the alternative.

I like hearing criticisms of music I love because it leads me to examine the basis for my own views and sometimes come out with a richer and more nuanced appreciation for the work in question.

The criticism is the valuable stuff.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by bodysnatcher »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Jaeti wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
RockPusher wrote:Can we please have a new thread for technical production/mix stuff, so that the album and song threads can, you know, be ABOUT THE MUSIC?
If people have issue with sound quality, isn’t that about the music?
Uh oh.
I’m just a mod trying to figure out what would be best for the discussion around here
Anything in between here [holds hands about two feet apart] in the groupthink
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Birds in Hell »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Jaeti wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
RockPusher wrote:Can we please have a new thread for technical production/mix stuff, so that the album and song threads can, you know, be ABOUT THE MUSIC?
If people have issue with sound quality, isn’t that about the music?
Uh oh.
I’m just a mod trying to figure out what would be best for the discussion around here
I don't think you should split the thread.
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by oneway23 »

Discussing the song should mean every facet of the song, no?
Simple, really.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Birds in Hell wrote:
Mike wrote:Talking about why someone does not enjoy this song is okay! This does not have to lessen anyones enjoyment of this song! This is all okay and good!
Same old thing every new album cycle. Wouldn't high-fiving each other about how much the song rules get boring after a while?

Talking about the things people don't enjoy about the song, and identifying how and why, is an interesting conversation, or at least has the potential to be - arguably more interesting than the alternative.

I like hearing criticisms of music I love because it leads me to examine the basis for my own views and sometimes come out with a richer and more nuanced appreciation for the work in question.

The criticism is the valuable stuff.
Well said
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by bodysnatcher »

That’s gonna be hilarious if that Sergio guy actually shows up
User avatar
Val
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu December 07, 2023 9:27 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Val »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Val wrote: The focus on production isn’t the focusedness that people need to be focused on.

Big no-no.
You would have hated the original avocado album thread
Pretty sure I was an RMer long before Avocado.
Never mind the new “join date”.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Val wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Val wrote: The focus on production isn’t the focusedness that people need to be focused on.

Big no-no.
You would have hated the original avocado album thread
Pretty sure I was an RMer long before Avocado.
Never mind the new “join date”.
Then you should remember the endless pages of bitching about the production on that album. This is nothing in this thread!
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

Who remembers how much people hated riot act?
User avatar
Val
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu December 07, 2023 9:27 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Val »

stip wrote:Who remembers how much people hated riot act?
I remember a lot of people loving it
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Birds in Hell »

On production, I don't think it sounds great and it's definitely not my preferred style of rock production, however I think it sounds better than either Backspacer or Lightning Bolt.

This at least has a cohesive aesthetic - radio ready glossy modern rock - and does what it sets out to do, whereas both of those records just sound awful.
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2906
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Buby »

Val wrote:
Buby wrote:
Val wrote: That name has a Romanian ring to it.
What's your thing with Romania Val?
I have a “thing” with Romania? :|
I withdraw my question. My bad.
I thought you also meant Romanian by "rooskie" a few pages back on the other thread.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

Val wrote:
stip wrote:Who remembers how much people hated riot act?
I remember a lot of people loving it
I mean, compared to Lightning Bolt, sure. But there was a large and unhappy group of RMers not pleased with it. Some (many?) came around
User avatar
Val
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu December 07, 2023 9:27 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Val »

Buby wrote:
Val wrote:
Buby wrote:
Val wrote: That name has a Romanian ring to it.
What's your thing with Romania Val?
I have a “thing” with Romania? :|
I withdraw my question. My bad.
I thought you also meant Romanian by "rooskie" a few pages back on the other thread.
No worries
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by oneway23 »

stip wrote:
Val wrote:
stip wrote:Who remembers how much people hated riot act?
I remember a lot of people loving it
I mean, compared to Lightning Bolt, sure. But there was a large and unhappy group of RMers not pleased with it. Some (many?) came around
RA is probably a highlight in their catalog, production wise. Think it was more the "Ed sounding like he was watching his dog get run over time & time again" energy in the vocals, and his seeming inability to open his mouth more than 20% of the way.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
Post Reply