Dark Matter (song)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Dark Matter Initial Reactions

5 Stars
33
17%
4 Stars
92
48%
3 Stars
56
29%
2 Stars
8
4%
1 Star
3
2%
 
Total votes: 192

User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9317
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Kevin Davis »

Sorry, I see Jorge and Trag said basically the same thing...
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by RockPusher »

Dark Matter sounds far less sterile to me than Mind Your Manners
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2905
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Buby »

We'll get a fresh batch of 11 songs.
Some will sound good maybe even great on record.
Some will sound better on the live bootlegs.
A good time for most ;)

Image
User avatar
DDWJMUVW
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 703
Joined: Wed December 13, 2023 9:44 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by DDWJMUVW »

RockPusher wrote:Dark Matter sounds far less sterile to me than Mind Your Manners
I just hate pretty much everything about MYM.

It’s almost been relegated to CDM territory.


In no universe should those be mentioned with DM, which is a really good rawk song.
"For me, it's all about the time we're having just playing the songs. So if it's kind of a mindless good time, then....."
User avatar
Clem Halibut
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri January 17, 2020 4:59 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Clem Halibut »

McParadigm wrote:
Clem Halibut wrote:
Strat wrote:someone asked Dave A what he thought of the new single and said "it has whiff of soundgarden to it!" to which dave replied "yea, it has a whiff of something :P "
Sorry. Who is Dave A ?
Dave Andbusters
Okay...so nobody important.
“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.”
― Charles Bukowski
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by McParadigm »

tragabigzanda wrote:With the exception of Aeroplane, all of McP's examples are of lo-fi, tinny recording that exhibit a ton of charm.
Diary of a Madman was recorded at Ridge Farm Studios.
Jorge wrote:But yeah if the songs are good that overrides everything else
Yup!
Kevin Davis wrote:no real disagreements with any of it. But I would add that, to me at least, there is a significant difference between a recording that is simply imperfect at the source (i.e. your GBV example) and a recording that has been beefed up and polished unnaturally in post-production.
I broadly agree with what you, plat, and trag are saying about it. But I also think we tend to romanticize heavy-handed production decisions if we like the resulting work…if the results pleased us, we see the choices as having a degree of artistic authenticity that isn’t always factual.

Nobody gives two shits that the Beatles switched over from recording their own doubling vocal tracks to using an artificial method that reduced the human imperfections in favor of the lads just generally not wanting to bother. Double tracking was about commercial viability, not artistic vision. It wasn’t a creativity-based decision. And the Beatles jumped on the opportunity to do it with the most artificial means available to them. But we’re not going to bitch about fucking Revolver, because sometimes you just have to grow up and not think about this shit.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by spike »

First listen after several days. This one still bops.
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by oneway23 »

Clem Halibut wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
Clem Halibut wrote:
Strat wrote:someone asked Dave A what he thought of the new single and said "it has whiff of soundgarden to it!" to which dave replied "yea, it has a whiff of something :P "
Sorry. Who is Dave A ?
Dave Andbusters
Okay...so nobody important.
Dave A. still whining about Pearl Jam is somehow almost worse than Dave Mustaine still talking about Metallica or Dave Ellefson still talking about Megadeth.
Daves generally suck

They should start a band together and play nothing but Metallica, Megadeth, and Pearl Jam covers.
Last edited by oneway23 on Tue February 27, 2024 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by spike »

I love how straight forward the chorus is was written, no attempt at lyrical imagery like “it’s a world wide suicide!” Just a frustrated adult yelling at clouds about the world he’s stuck with.
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2905
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Buby »

oneway23 wrote:
Clem Halibut wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
Clem Halibut wrote:
Strat wrote:someone asked Dave A what he thought of the new single and said "it has whiff of soundgarden to it!" to which dave replied "yea, it has a whiff of something :P "
Sorry. Who is Dave A ?
Dave Andbusters
Okay...so nobody important.
Dave A. still whining about Pearl Jam is somehow almost worse than Dave Mustaine still talking about Metallica or Dave Ellefson still talking about Megadeth.
Daves generally suck

They should start a band together and play noting but Metallica, Megadeth, and Pearl Jam covers.
The Jamily that can't get over the drummer from 20 years ago fits right there too.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by digster »

McParadigm wrote: Nobody gives two shits that the Beatles switched over from recording their own doubling vocal tracks to using an artificial method that reduced the human imperfections in favor of the lads just generally not wanting to bother. Double tracking was about commercial viability, not artistic vision. It wasn’t a creativity-based decision. And the Beatles jumped on the opportunity to do it with the most artificial means available to them. But we’re not going to bitch about fucking Revolver, because sometimes you just have to grow up and not think about this shit.
But is anyone doing that here? You're right that no one shits on Revolver because of a change in production methods, because the results speak for themselves. I don't think anyone here is saying Dark Matter sounds incredible, but they still have to hate it based on principle due to the way it was made.

I think lo-fi, shitty production can work fine provided it's the right box for what we're listening to; Guided by Voices may not benefit from the production sheen, time and resources that go into a Radiohead album, for example (nor would Radiohead put their best forward with just using a Tascam 4-track), but those choices (even if, in some cases, they weren't a choice at all) elevate what we're hearing.
Last edited by digster on Tue February 27, 2024 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Strat »

Trag actually loves the song but he can't get out of his own way
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by RockPusher »

Watching The Darkness guy break down the song, I was thinking that an acoustic version of it could actually be pretty awesome.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

i just want to unite the board for a moment by sharing that I prefer Mind Your Manners to Dark Matter
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by digster »

stip wrote:i just want to unite the board for a moment by sharing that I prefer Mind Your Manners to Dark Matter
I'd agree; I think Mind Your Manners ended up being the best song to come out of LB, for me.
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by RockPusher »

stip wrote:i just want to unite the board for a moment by sharing that I prefer Mind Your Manners to Dark Matter
Taking one for the team, eh?
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by spike »

Surely AI can fix this mess.

Dark Manners and Mind Your Matters coming soon.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51691
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by McParadigm »

digster wrote:
McParadigm wrote: Nobody gives two shits that the Beatles switched over from recording their own doubling vocal tracks to using an artificial method that reduced the human imperfections in favor of the lads just generally not wanting to bother. Double tracking was about commercial viability, not artistic vision. It wasn’t a creativity-based decision. And the Beatles jumped on the opportunity to do it with the most artificial means available to them. But we’re not going to bitch about fucking Revolver, because sometimes you just have to grow up and not think about this shit.
But is anyone doing that here? You're right that no one shits on Revolver because of a change in production methods, because the results speak for themselves. I don't think anyone here is saying Dark Matter sounds incredible, but they still have to hate it based on principle due to the way it was made.
I can see how, if one severs that paragraph from the one it was elaborating on directly above it, it can be misread in this way.

Fortunately, that context can be reinserted, and the point can remain what it actually was (“when we like something, we romanticize the reasons for it being the way it is”) and not the misunderstanding version that you describe here (which appears to be “as listeners, we consider the details first, and then selectively admit to liking the content if the details meet the right criteria”).
But I also think we tend to romanticize heavy-handed production decisions if we like the resulting work…if the results pleased us, we see the choices as having a degree of artistic authenticity that isn’t always factual.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51691
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply