Dark Matter (song)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Dark Matter Initial Reactions

5 Stars
33
17%
4 Stars
92
48%
3 Stars
56
29%
2 Stars
8
4%
1 Star
3
2%
 
Total votes: 192

User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by oneway23 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Image
Now there's a kid who's definitely going to grow up to hate dynamic-range compression and peak limiting.
Last edited by oneway23 on Tue February 27, 2024 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Jorge »

The double take I did when that kid blinked
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Ello Sailor
Posting (live)
Posts: 17745
Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ello Sailor »

tragabigzanda wrote:No, I really don't think so. It's a physical reaction. I can quite literally feel the nerve endings in my ears recoil.
And this chode wants to take up boxing. Unreal.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

:lol:
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

tragabigzanda wrote:
stip wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
McParadigm wrote:I broadly agree with what you, plat, and trag are saying about it. But I also think we tend to romanticize heavy-handed production decisions if we like the resulting work…if the results pleased us, we see the choices as having a degree of artistic authenticity that isn’t always factual.

Nobody gives two shits that the Beatles switched over from recording their own doubling vocal tracks to using an artificial method that reduced the human imperfections in favor of the lads just generally not wanting to bother. Double tracking was about commercial viability, not artistic vision. It wasn’t a creativity-based decision. And the Beatles jumped on the opportunity to do it with the most artificial means available to them. But we’re not going to bitch about fucking Revolver, because sometimes you just have to grow up and not think about this shit.
I have a pretty high threshold for variance in production choices, even on records I don't especially care for. I don't have a vendetta against aesthetic fauxs-pas of yesteryear, or against production decisions being made in pursuit of commercial ends; I like the way those little fads and hallmarks contribute to the story of music history. And to be completely honest, I didn't even register this stuff for most of my life. But there has been a pretty sharp turn in the last five years in regards to how my ears naturally respond to records that feel aggressively loud and compressed. This is very likely due to changes in my hearing/general biology as I get older, but it does seem relatively unique to records that have been released in the past...10 years? 15 years? Records from the '50's and '60's simply don't possess these same characteristics, unless they're foisted upon them by way of a modern remastering.

And just to be clear, this isn't me "thinking about this shit" so much as it is trying to articulate, for the sake of discussion, what it is that I'm naturally hearing and feeling when I listen to the recording, the same way I would try to articulate what I'm hearing in an arrangement, or a performance, or a set of lyrics. I don't know going into a new song what my brain and ears are going to respond to or focus on, but I enjoy following the thread whatever it may be. That's all I'm trying to do here.
I’m not saying it’s not worth discussing, and I have said I don’t disagree with the broad points you have made. I’m only saying that our impatience or irritation with these things is often conditional, and dependent on our opinion of the music involved. We like or dislike the record first, and then we begin the post mortem. If the music was sufficiently enthralling, the production ceases to be a hurtle.

You’re certainly right that the last 10-15 years has normalized a lot of bad behaviors in music production. Some of the records that suffered from these choices have been appreciated in the OB forum. And why not? The music was good.

When the point is “the production is unfavorable or harsh,” then I agree. But when that becomes a barrier to someone’s ability to like the song, that’s just a matter of their personal preferences and priorities. That’s all that is.
I think this oversimplifies, to the point of negating, what is for some (for me) a wholly visceral experience. It's not couched in some sort of logical scaffolding; the post-mortem happens after I hear the music and my face involuntarily starts wincing.
that's not your personal preference?
No, I really don't think so. It's a physical reaction. I can quite literally feel the nerve endings in my ears recoil.
mental preferences can absolutely provoke physical reactions, though. Some people experience their preferences pretty viscerally.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

and you've convinced me it sounds bad, we've literally swapped places
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by RockPusher »

Just listened on the 'phones again and this thing ALWAYS turns me into a human bobblehead. Put on Worldwide Suicide afterward (which was the closest analog I could come up with at the moment) to see if it evokes the same visceral response in me, and it doesn't, though it gets close in a couple parts. This is Pearl Jam at their best, in my opinion.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2904
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Buby »

RockPusher wrote:Just listened on the 'phones again and this thing ALWAYS turns me into a human bobblehead. Put on Worldwide Suicide afterward (which was the closest analog I could come up with at the moment) to see if it evokes the same visceral response in me, and it doesn't, though it gets close in a couple parts. This is Pearl Jam at their best, in my opinion.
Maybe due to rarely going back to it, but I still bop to WWS.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52024
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

WWS is better than Dark Matter. In my opinion, of course
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19190
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by dad »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:WWS is better than Dark Matter. In my opinion, of course
agreed. it slaps.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43422
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by VinylGuy »

Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52024
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

VinylGuy wrote:Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
Why does he have to go away because of his opinion? We all know how everyone feels about this song. Why doesn’t anyone else have to go away?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
Why does he have to go away because of his opinion? We all know how everyone feels about this song. Why doesn’t anyone else have to go away?
we all have to go away
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by oneway23 »

tragabigzanda wrote:
dad wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:WWS is better than Dark Matter. In my opinion, of course
agreed. it slaps.
:bammer:
Stone is king on WWS, especially going into that final verse...boss
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43422
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by VinylGuy »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
Why does he have to go away because of his opinion? We all know how everyone feels about this song. Why doesn’t anyone else have to go away?
so everybody can discuss the song safe and free
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by McParadigm »

Buby wrote:
RockPusher wrote:Just listened on the 'phones again and this thing ALWAYS turns me into a human bobblehead. Put on Worldwide Suicide afterward (which was the closest analog I could come up with at the moment) to see if it evokes the same visceral response in me, and it doesn't, though it gets close in a couple parts. This is Pearl Jam at their best, in my opinion.
Maybe due to rarely going back to it, but I still bop to WWS.
I very rarely listen to the song. When I do, I really enjoy it. But if I play it again in the short term, my returns diminish swiftly.

Any amount of recency has a neutering effect on the song for me.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply