Now there's a kid who's definitely going to grow up to hate dynamic-range compression and peak limiting.E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Dark Matter (song)
- oneway23
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Last edited by oneway23 on Tue February 27, 2024 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36761
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Dark Matter (song)
The double take I did when that kid blinked
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Ello Sailor
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17745
- Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
And this chode wants to take up boxing. Unreal.tragabigzanda wrote:No, I really don't think so. It's a physical reaction. I can quite literally feel the nerve endings in my ears recoil.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
mental preferences can absolutely provoke physical reactions, though. Some people experience their preferences pretty viscerally.tragabigzanda wrote:No, I really don't think so. It's a physical reaction. I can quite literally feel the nerve endings in my ears recoil.stip wrote:that's not your personal preference?tragabigzanda wrote:I think this oversimplifies, to the point of negating, what is for some (for me) a wholly visceral experience. It's not couched in some sort of logical scaffolding; the post-mortem happens after I hear the music and my face involuntarily starts wincing.McParadigm wrote:I’m not saying it’s not worth discussing, and I have said I don’t disagree with the broad points you have made. I’m only saying that our impatience or irritation with these things is often conditional, and dependent on our opinion of the music involved. We like or dislike the record first, and then we begin the post mortem. If the music was sufficiently enthralling, the production ceases to be a hurtle.Kevin Davis wrote:I have a pretty high threshold for variance in production choices, even on records I don't especially care for. I don't have a vendetta against aesthetic fauxs-pas of yesteryear, or against production decisions being made in pursuit of commercial ends; I like the way those little fads and hallmarks contribute to the story of music history. And to be completely honest, I didn't even register this stuff for most of my life. But there has been a pretty sharp turn in the last five years in regards to how my ears naturally respond to records that feel aggressively loud and compressed. This is very likely due to changes in my hearing/general biology as I get older, but it does seem relatively unique to records that have been released in the past...10 years? 15 years? Records from the '50's and '60's simply don't possess these same characteristics, unless they're foisted upon them by way of a modern remastering.McParadigm wrote:I broadly agree with what you, plat, and trag are saying about it. But I also think we tend to romanticize heavy-handed production decisions if we like the resulting work…if the results pleased us, we see the choices as having a degree of artistic authenticity that isn’t always factual.
Nobody gives two shits that the Beatles switched over from recording their own doubling vocal tracks to using an artificial method that reduced the human imperfections in favor of the lads just generally not wanting to bother. Double tracking was about commercial viability, not artistic vision. It wasn’t a creativity-based decision. And the Beatles jumped on the opportunity to do it with the most artificial means available to them. But we’re not going to bitch about fucking Revolver, because sometimes you just have to grow up and not think about this shit.
And just to be clear, this isn't me "thinking about this shit" so much as it is trying to articulate, for the sake of discussion, what it is that I'm naturally hearing and feeling when I listen to the recording, the same way I would try to articulate what I'm hearing in an arrangement, or a performance, or a set of lyrics. I don't know going into a new song what my brain and ears are going to respond to or focus on, but I enjoy following the thread whatever it may be. That's all I'm trying to do here.
You’re certainly right that the last 10-15 years has normalized a lot of bad behaviors in music production. Some of the records that suffered from these choices have been appreciated in the OB forum. And why not? The music was good.
When the point is “the production is unfavorable or harsh,” then I agree. But when that becomes a barrier to someone’s ability to like the song, that’s just a matter of their personal preferences and priorities. That’s all that is.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
and you've convinced me it sounds bad, we've literally swapped places
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- RockPusher
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
- Location: This godforsaken town
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Just listened on the 'phones again and this thing ALWAYS turns me into a human bobblehead. Put on Worldwide Suicide afterward (which was the closest analog I could come up with at the moment) to see if it evokes the same visceral response in me, and it doesn't, though it gets close in a couple parts. This is Pearl Jam at their best, in my opinion.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
- Buby
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: West of Deedle
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Maybe due to rarely going back to it, but I still bop to WWS.RockPusher wrote:Just listened on the 'phones again and this thing ALWAYS turns me into a human bobblehead. Put on Worldwide Suicide afterward (which was the closest analog I could come up with at the moment) to see if it evokes the same visceral response in me, and it doesn't, though it gets close in a couple parts. This is Pearl Jam at their best, in my opinion.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52024
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
WWS is better than Dark Matter. In my opinion, of course
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
agreed. it slaps.E.H. Ruddock wrote:WWS is better than Dark Matter. In my opinion, of course
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43421
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52024
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Why does he have to go away because of his opinion? We all know how everyone feels about this song. Why doesn’t anyone else have to go away?VinylGuy wrote:Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13642
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Dark Matter (song)
we all have to go awayE.H. Ruddock wrote:Why does he have to go away because of his opinion? We all know how everyone feels about this song. Why doesn’t anyone else have to go away?VinylGuy wrote:Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
- oneway23
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Stone is king on WWS, especially going into that final verse...bosstragabigzanda wrote:dad wrote:agreed. it slaps.E.H. Ruddock wrote:WWS is better than Dark Matter. In my opinion, of course
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43421
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
so everybody can discuss the song safe and freeE.H. Ruddock wrote:Why does he have to go away because of his opinion? We all know how everyone feels about this song. Why doesn’t anyone else have to go away?VinylGuy wrote:Trag please just go away from this thread, we all know how you feel, now its time for you to listen to some ice spice
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Dark Matter (song)
I very rarely listen to the song. When I do, I really enjoy it. But if I play it again in the short term, my returns diminish swiftly.Buby wrote:Maybe due to rarely going back to it, but I still bop to WWS.RockPusher wrote:Just listened on the 'phones again and this thing ALWAYS turns me into a human bobblehead. Put on Worldwide Suicide afterward (which was the closest analog I could come up with at the moment) to see if it evokes the same visceral response in me, and it doesn't, though it gets close in a couple parts. This is Pearl Jam at their best, in my opinion.
Any amount of recency has a neutering effect on the song for me.
(patriotic choking noises)
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Dark Matter (song)
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
