Dark Matter (song)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Dark Matter Initial Reactions

5 Stars
33
17%
4 Stars
92
48%
3 Stars
56
29%
2 Stars
8
4%
1 Star
3
2%
 
Total votes: 192

User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40182
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by wease »

stip wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
Wotman is primarily a producer not an engineer and his Grammy wins are for production, not engineering.
yea but the guy he used (serbian something?) also has a few
He’s a musical genius
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

serban ghena. But mixing not engineering
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2076
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by RockPusher »

stip wrote:that was a response to rockpusher’s post. this reads pretty mean spirited following Jorge’s
Those organizations Jorge mentioned don't exist. I was just being snarky saying that he had pulled them out of, erm, somewhere.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

but his ass is real, right?
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2076
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by RockPusher »

stip wrote:but his ass is real, right?
I read about it on the internet so it must be.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Jaeti »

VinylGuy wrote:I dont see NAIS and Half Full being into the same category, and while i understand Dotc and DM being kinda tied to, i also think DM has more elements from previous PJ than Dance.

I still hear some Riot Act and Binaural there, specially in the guitar tones. But mostly it also feels it could be a lost song from Gigaton or even some stuff they left out from Vs too, perhaps thats why i like so much.

And im still blown with Matt´s performance, he really is doing all kinds of interesting things all the time.
I still think I think the best comparison for Dark Matter was, courtesy of some other poster, "Alone meets Ghost."
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Jaeti »

stip wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Noaheb wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:I have spoken
Again
Stip invites a bunch of redditors here for his tournament, I need to make sure they are up to speed
do you think they need a comprehensive recounting of which songs are better than Dark Matter and which songs Dark Matter is better than?
Emphatic "yes."
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

tragabigzanda wrote:You are welcome to enjoy the song but there is no way in hades it “sounds phenomenal”
stop this campaign of hate before it destroys everything you hold dear
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

RockPusher wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
My understanding is they are voting members of Jorge's ass.

And the more I think about it, the more I like the aggressive mix of this song. If the whole album is that way, maybe it won't work for certain songs, but I liked how Earthling sounded so I imagine I'll be fine with the rest of it.
Earthling, to me, had a range of mixing styles for different songs; "Invincible" sounds nothing like "Good and Evil" sounds nothing like "Picture"; it'd be nice if the album displayed that sonic range
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10375
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by liebzz »

Ms Harmless wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
My understanding is they are voting members of Jorge's ass.

And the more I think about it, the more I like the aggressive mix of this song. If the whole album is that way, maybe it won't work for certain songs, but I liked how Earthling sounded so I imagine I'll be fine with the rest of it.
Earthling, to me, had a range of mixing styles for different songs; "Invincible" sounds nothing like "Good and Evil" sounds nothing like "Picture"; it'd be nice if the album displayed that sonic range
I am assuming this is the case. The descriptions bear that out, and they’ve never held on to the same sound across an entire album maybe save for arguably Ten.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

liebzz wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
My understanding is they are voting members of Jorge's ass.

And the more I think about it, the more I like the aggressive mix of this song. If the whole album is that way, maybe it won't work for certain songs, but I liked how Earthling sounded so I imagine I'll be fine with the rest of it.
Earthling, to me, had a range of mixing styles for different songs; "Invincible" sounds nothing like "Good and Evil" sounds nothing like "Picture"; it'd be nice if the album displayed that sonic range
I am assuming this is the case. The descriptions bear that out, and they’ve never held on to the same sound across an entire album maybe save for arguably Ten.
my only worry is that Lightning Bolt had that very varied approach too, but there was no unifying sonic thread, it was all over the place; I think we'll get better than that but yeah
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28035
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

liebzz wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
My understanding is they are voting members of Jorge's ass.

And the more I think about it, the more I like the aggressive mix of this song. If the whole album is that way, maybe it won't work for certain songs, but I liked how Earthling sounded so I imagine I'll be fine with the rest of it.
Earthling, to me, had a range of mixing styles for different songs; "Invincible" sounds nothing like "Good and Evil" sounds nothing like "Picture"; it'd be nice if the album displayed that sonic range
I am assuming this is the case. The descriptions bear that out, and they’ve never held on to the same sound across an entire album maybe save for arguably Ten.
Riot Act
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10375
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by liebzz »

My sense it will be much better. I would probably take Dark Matter over any song on LB. If you compare lead singles, I think Dark Matter is much stronger than Mind Your Manners - which I think is one of the better songs on LB. My sense is that we’ll be happy with the energy of this album, possibly disappointed it doesn’t have the nuance of a Gigaton, which still feels to me like a very cohesive album despite their very varied palette.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10375
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by liebzz »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
liebzz wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
My understanding is they are voting members of Jorge's ass.

And the more I think about it, the more I like the aggressive mix of this song. If the whole album is that way, maybe it won't work for certain songs, but I liked how Earthling sounded so I imagine I'll be fine with the rest of it.
Earthling, to me, had a range of mixing styles for different songs; "Invincible" sounds nothing like "Good and Evil" sounds nothing like "Picture"; it'd be nice if the album displayed that sonic range
I am assuming this is the case. The descriptions bear that out, and they’ve never held on to the same sound across an entire album maybe save for arguably Ten.
Riot Act
I mean, I Am Mine, Help Help, You Are, Get Right all very different sounding to me.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Jorge »

Depends on what you mean by "the same sound"
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Ms Harmless »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
liebzz wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
My understanding is they are voting members of Jorge's ass.

And the more I think about it, the more I like the aggressive mix of this song. If the whole album is that way, maybe it won't work for certain songs, but I liked how Earthling sounded so I imagine I'll be fine with the rest of it.
Earthling, to me, had a range of mixing styles for different songs; "Invincible" sounds nothing like "Good and Evil" sounds nothing like "Picture"; it'd be nice if the album displayed that sonic range
I am assuming this is the case. The descriptions bear that out, and they’ve never held on to the same sound across an entire album maybe save for arguably Ten.
Riot Act
yes
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Kevin Davis »

stip wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
stip wrote:so how did this engineer win multiple grammies if the sound is that bad? i assume the dark matter production is not an outlier? serious question. are IAVS and GHAC not voting members of the academy?
Wotman is primarily a producer not an engineer and his Grammy wins are for production, not engineering.
yea but the guy he used (serbian something?) also has a few
An interesting read:

https://www.vox.com/2015/2/4/7976729/gr ... ng-process

To compare the Grammy ballot to a regular election ballot, I imagine the categories like "Album of the Year" being comparable to "President" or "Governor," while categories like "Best Engineered Album" are comparable to "Third District School Board Treasurer." People have been listening to the presidential candidates run their mouths all year long, but the ballot is likely the first time some voters have even seen some of the more obscure categories. To that end, people either (a) abstain, or (b) make choices based on things like name recognition, affiliations, etc. And of course, even in categories where voters are much more familiar with the candidates, we know they sometimes still make really dumb choices...

That's not to say that everyone who wins a Grammy inherently sucks, just that such an award doesn't necessarily signify a thoughtful, considered, informed voting process.

An interesting quote from the article:
One of the biggest problems with the Grammy voting committee is it's so big that many voting members are not familiar with every category. What this means is that big names and Top 40 artists are more likely to get nominated from the entry pool and win in the voting rounds. As Rob Kenner, a Grammy screener, wrote for Complex:

"I soon learned another unwritten rule during private conversations with other committee members: be careful about green-lighting an album by someone who was really famous if you don’t want to see that album win a Grammy. Because famous people tend to get more votes from clueless Academy members, regardless of the quality of their work."
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by stip »

it’s enough to make you think awards aren’t directly correlated to quality

but still, if pearl jam wins a grammy Ill be excited as hell
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Kevin Davis »

It's always fun when someone you like wins, and when an artist that is special to you enjoys a moment of heightened cultural interest. The RRHOF is silly but that was a fun few months to be a fan of the band.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Dark Matter (song)

Post by Strat »

man, i can totally picture ed gracefully accepting a grammy and now i dont know what to think about any of this
Post Reply