Running
- oneway23
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am
Re: Running
Bridge is killer, agreed
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40174
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread
What if this album is the Riot Act to Gigaton’s Binaural?tommy wrote:Huell wrote:tree_ wrote:He actually says ''not like about it". It was a sarcastic jab. You should be less honest, he thinks. I guess he feels sorry for them.Huell wrote:tommy wrote:Anything you don't like about it?Huell wrote:Just listened… this makes Superblood Wolfmoon sound like something from Binaural… this band is a creatively burnt out piece of carbon from a previous artistic chemical reaction that they channelled so well up to Riot Act. It sounds so goddamn forced while also having no clever ideas. Have they ever released a rocker with the riff so boring? It’s sounds like filler content music with Ed Vedder shoved up its ass while he gnashes and snares all recorded by a toddler who pushed all the levers to MAX. Fucking hell
It’s not too chintzy I suppose!
But then again that could be a negative too
I was a bit over the top. I get vestibular migraines and don’t usually listen to music this maxxed out anymore. I think I find that production or mastering too harsh to enjoy. I loved Gigaton too and hoped they would build on that songwriting but the dynamics here don’t sound well arranged or by a band locking into a groove. It sounds like a green day riff that way explained to the rest of the band and Ed giving his damndest to give it life.
I do think this album is shaping up to be the Avocado to Gigaton's Riot Act.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Running
also big fan of the intro/distorted bass. Very IDLES 
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Running
I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Running
tragabigzanda wrote:(stip's 8000-word missive that's longer than the song itself in 3, 2, 1...)
Friday night at the earliest, I'm afraid. Still haven't heard it
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Vindicator
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Tue August 27, 2013 10:20 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Running
Lukin is a DIFFERENT kind of word salad. In a good way. He's screaming on Lukin. He's letting it rip. It's different to an Ole / Superblood spritz word salad.
Last edited by Vindicator on Thu March 21, 2024 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Running
Death Magnatteroneway23 wrote:They should have called this album Dark Magnetic
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10370
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Running
Yeah I liked this song. Agreed it probably isn’t single material in the way they are selling Waiting For Stevie or wreckage. Those who said Earthlings are pretty on the nose.
-
Release_Me
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 10:01 am
Re: Running
I'm liking this as much as I could hope to like a 2 minute punk rock style song from PJ. It has never been my favourite type of song from them, so I'm kind of glad I enjoy it as much as I do. Prefer it to similar songs on previous albums (Big Wave, Supersonic, etc.).
Looking forward to the rest of the album now that we have 2 of the punk-ish ones out of the way. I never loved Lukin much either and I think Ed sounds better in Running overall. I like the vocal melody and the bridge in particular. Yet, I think making the bridge the chorus may not have worked as well. The bridge is nice in contrast to the frenetic parts of the song, in my opinion.
Looking forward to the rest of the album now that we have 2 of the punk-ish ones out of the way. I never loved Lukin much either and I think Ed sounds better in Running overall. I like the vocal melody and the bridge in particular. Yet, I think making the bridge the chorus may not have worked as well. The bridge is nice in contrast to the frenetic parts of the song, in my opinion.
Pearl Jam is the only band I'll spend money on.
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Running
This gets three stars.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Running
stip wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:(stip's 8000-word missive that's longer than the song itself in 3, 2, 1...)
Friday night at the earliest, I'm afraid. Still haven't heard it
tree_ wrote:we should feed stips other write-ups into ChatGPT and predict what he might say about this new song
Or sooner
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Running
he can't scream that way anymore, I think this is the part of the equation he isn't choosingVindicator wrote:Lukin is a DIFFERENT kind of word salad. In a good way. He's screaming on Lukin. He's letting it rip. It's different to an Ole / Superblood type spritz
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Running
i cant hear a single CYmbal or Crash ring outThejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
- Mike
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3130
- Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
- Location: Baltic Sea, Germany
Re: Running
In an unexpected pivot from their grunge-laden, introspective pathways, Pearl Jam has plunged into the punk sphere with their latest single, "Running." Known for their evocative storytelling and Eddie Vedder's unmistakable baritone that has defined a generation, the band’s foray into the fast-paced, frenetic world of punk comes as both a shock and a thrill to fans and critics alike. However, the endeavor, while ambitious, is significantly undercut by the production choices helmed by Andrew Watt, leading to a release that feels more like a stumble than the intended sprint.
"Running" opens with a jolt of electric energy, a manic guitar riff that immediately sets the stage for what promises to be a high-octane ride. The introduction is pure punk ethos — quick, dirty, and unapologetically brash. Vedder’s vocals soon join the fray, delivering lines with a rapid-fire intensity that we've seldom heard from him. It's a fresh and exhilarating experience hearing his voice in this new context, riding the wave of a tempo that relentlessly pushes forward. The lyrics, a muddled blend of rebellion and introspection, seem to bridge the gap between Pearl Jam’s storied past and their punk experimentations.
However, the initial excitement quickly gives way to the realization that something is amiss in the sonic landscape of "Running." The production, led by Andrew Watt, known for his work with a diverse range of artists from Justin Bieber to Ozzy Osbourne, unfortunately, does not do justice to Pearl Jam’s punk endeavor. There’s a palpable tension between the raw energy the band brings to the table and the polished sheen that Watt’s production imposes on the track. The result is a sound that feels constrained, as if the song’s inherent punk spirit is struggling to break free from a cocoon of overproduction.
The guitar tracks, which should be the raw, beating heart of any punk song, are buried under layers of unnecessary effects, robbing them of their visceral impact. Matt Cameron's drums, which should provide a frenetic backbone to the track, are oddly muted, lacking the punch and crispness needed to drive the song’s manic energy forward. The bass, courtesy of Jeff Ament, fares slightly better, managing to cut through the mix with moments of clarity that harken back to the genre's garage band roots. Yet, these moments are fleeting, often drowned out by an overuse of synthesizers and sound effects that feel out of place in a punk track.
Vedder’s vocals, while energetically delivered, are another casualty of the production. At times, his voice seems to fight against the mix, struggling for air amidst a sea of reverb and compression. The raw edge and emotional depth that are hallmarks of Vedder’s delivery are lost, leaving the listener longing for the unfiltered passion that Pearl Jam is capable of delivering.
Lyrically, "Running" attempts to capture a sense of urgency and disillusionment with the status quo, themes that resonate deeply in the punk genre. However, the impact of these messages is blunted by the production choices, leaving the listener to wonder what could have been if the song had been allowed to embrace its raw, unpolished roots.
In conclusion, "Running" represents a bold but flawed experiment for Pearl Jam. The decision to explore the punk genre showcases the band’s willingness to take risks and step outside their comfort zone, a commendable trait for artists three decades into their career. However, the potential of this spirited endeavor is undermined by production choices that stifle the song’s energy rather than amplifying it. As "Running" crosses the finish line, it leaves behind a trail of what-ifs — a glimpse of a band capable of reinventing themselves, yet constrained by the very production meant to elevate their sound.
"Running" opens with a jolt of electric energy, a manic guitar riff that immediately sets the stage for what promises to be a high-octane ride. The introduction is pure punk ethos — quick, dirty, and unapologetically brash. Vedder’s vocals soon join the fray, delivering lines with a rapid-fire intensity that we've seldom heard from him. It's a fresh and exhilarating experience hearing his voice in this new context, riding the wave of a tempo that relentlessly pushes forward. The lyrics, a muddled blend of rebellion and introspection, seem to bridge the gap between Pearl Jam’s storied past and their punk experimentations.
However, the initial excitement quickly gives way to the realization that something is amiss in the sonic landscape of "Running." The production, led by Andrew Watt, known for his work with a diverse range of artists from Justin Bieber to Ozzy Osbourne, unfortunately, does not do justice to Pearl Jam’s punk endeavor. There’s a palpable tension between the raw energy the band brings to the table and the polished sheen that Watt’s production imposes on the track. The result is a sound that feels constrained, as if the song’s inherent punk spirit is struggling to break free from a cocoon of overproduction.
The guitar tracks, which should be the raw, beating heart of any punk song, are buried under layers of unnecessary effects, robbing them of their visceral impact. Matt Cameron's drums, which should provide a frenetic backbone to the track, are oddly muted, lacking the punch and crispness needed to drive the song’s manic energy forward. The bass, courtesy of Jeff Ament, fares slightly better, managing to cut through the mix with moments of clarity that harken back to the genre's garage band roots. Yet, these moments are fleeting, often drowned out by an overuse of synthesizers and sound effects that feel out of place in a punk track.
Vedder’s vocals, while energetically delivered, are another casualty of the production. At times, his voice seems to fight against the mix, struggling for air amidst a sea of reverb and compression. The raw edge and emotional depth that are hallmarks of Vedder’s delivery are lost, leaving the listener longing for the unfiltered passion that Pearl Jam is capable of delivering.
Lyrically, "Running" attempts to capture a sense of urgency and disillusionment with the status quo, themes that resonate deeply in the punk genre. However, the impact of these messages is blunted by the production choices, leaving the listener to wonder what could have been if the song had been allowed to embrace its raw, unpolished roots.
In conclusion, "Running" represents a bold but flawed experiment for Pearl Jam. The decision to explore the punk genre showcases the band’s willingness to take risks and step outside their comfort zone, a commendable trait for artists three decades into their career. However, the potential of this spirited endeavor is undermined by production choices that stifle the song’s energy rather than amplifying it. As "Running" crosses the finish line, it leaves behind a trail of what-ifs — a glimpse of a band capable of reinventing themselves, yet constrained by the very production meant to elevate their sound.
- oneway23
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am
Re: Running
No decay or reverb tails at all on both songs so far...air-tight production, sounds like maybe no ambient mics so far? Is that off-base?Strat wrote:i cant hear a single CYmbal or Crash ring outThejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Running
this is exactly where I am on itRelease_Me wrote:I'm liking this as much as I could hope to like a 2 minute punk rock style song from PJ. It has never been my favourite type of song from them, so I'm kind of glad I enjoy it as much as I do. Prefer it to similar songs on previous albums (Big Wave, Supersonic, etc.).
Looking forward to the rest of the album now that we have 2 of the punk-ish ones out of the way. I never loved Lukin much either and I think Ed sounds better in Running overall. I like the vocal melody and the bridge in particular. Yet, I think making the bridge the chorus may not have worked as well. The bridge is nice in contrast to the frenetic parts of the song, in my opinion.
the bridge is a wide-open breath of fresh air that lifts the song and I don't need to hear it twice in a 2 minute song; that bridge in a 4 minute song would be a different story, it would feel like they just skirted over the best part of the song (incidentally I kind of feel like that about the "darkness comes in waves..." part of Life Wasted; it's utter gorgeousness in a sea of just fine)
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Running
listening again
yeah, the intro is great. Jeff is the man.
I actually like what the guitars are doing, specially how intense they are. This song is fucking intense yes.
The bridge is awesome AF, and im warming up with the solo.
The last 30 seconds are LOUD, i love it
I really want to see them play it live.
yeah, the intro is great. Jeff is the man.
I actually like what the guitars are doing, specially how intense they are. This song is fucking intense yes.
The bridge is awesome AF, and im warming up with the solo.
The last 30 seconds are LOUD, i love it
I really want to see them play it live.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Running
Whats this from?Mike wrote:In an unexpected pivot from their grunge-laden, introspective pathways, Pearl Jam has plunged into the punk sphere with their latest single, "Running." Known for their evocative storytelling and Eddie Vedder's unmistakable baritone that has defined a generation, the band’s foray into the fast-paced, frenetic world of punk comes as both a shock and a thrill to fans and critics alike. However, the endeavor, while ambitious, is significantly undercut by the production choices helmed by Andrew Watt, leading to a release that feels more like a stumble than the intended sprint.
"Running" opens with a jolt of electric energy, a manic guitar riff that immediately sets the stage for what promises to be a high-octane ride. The introduction is pure punk ethos — quick, dirty, and unapologetically brash. Vedder’s vocals soon join the fray, delivering lines with a rapid-fire intensity that we've seldom heard from him. It's a fresh and exhilarating experience hearing his voice in this new context, riding the wave of a tempo that relentlessly pushes forward. The lyrics, a muddled blend of rebellion and introspection, seem to bridge the gap between Pearl Jam’s storied past and their punk experimentations.
However, the initial excitement quickly gives way to the realization that something is amiss in the sonic landscape of "Running." The production, led by Andrew Watt, known for his work with a diverse range of artists from Justin Bieber to Ozzy Osbourne, unfortunately, does not do justice to Pearl Jam’s punk endeavor. There’s a palpable tension between the raw energy the band brings to the table and the polished sheen that Watt’s production imposes on the track. The result is a sound that feels constrained, as if the song’s inherent punk spirit is struggling to break free from a cocoon of overproduction.
The guitar tracks, which should be the raw, beating heart of any punk song, are buried under layers of unnecessary effects, robbing them of their visceral impact. Matt Cameron's drums, which should provide a frenetic backbone to the track, are oddly muted, lacking the punch and crispness needed to drive the song’s manic energy forward. The bass, courtesy of Jeff Ament, fares slightly better, managing to cut through the mix with moments of clarity that harken back to the genre's garage band roots. Yet, these moments are fleeting, often drowned out by an overuse of synthesizers and sound effects that feel out of place in a punk track.
Vedder’s vocals, while energetically delivered, are another casualty of the production. At times, his voice seems to fight against the mix, struggling for air amidst a sea of reverb and compression. The raw edge and emotional depth that are hallmarks of Vedder’s delivery are lost, leaving the listener longing for the unfiltered passion that Pearl Jam is capable of delivering.
Lyrically, "Running" attempts to capture a sense of urgency and disillusionment with the status quo, themes that resonate deeply in the punk genre. However, the impact of these messages is blunted by the production choices, leaving the listener to wonder what could have been if the song had been allowed to embrace its raw, unpolished roots.
In conclusion, "Running" represents a bold but flawed experiment for Pearl Jam. The decision to explore the punk genre showcases the band’s willingness to take risks and step outside their comfort zone, a commendable trait for artists three decades into their career. However, the potential of this spirited endeavor is undermined by production choices that stifle the song’s energy rather than amplifying it. As "Running" crosses the finish line, it leaves behind a trail of what-ifs — a glimpse of a band capable of reinventing themselves, yet constrained by the very production meant to elevate their sound.
- Mike
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3130
- Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
- Location: Baltic Sea, Germany
Re: Running
thats my secret