Running

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate the Song

5 Stars
13
8%
4 Stars
33
21%
3 Stars
75
47%
2 Stars
30
19%
1 Star
9
6%
 
Total votes: 160

Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

Strat wrote:
Thejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
i cant hear a single CYmbal or Crash ring out :(
it's 100% too squeaky clean; the only slight saving grace is that there's more distortion than on Backspacer
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Running

Post by Strat »

well, if you wrote it, i agree with it. if AI wrote it, i also agree with it.
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Running

Post by RockPusher »

Thejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
Yeah. If this is how it sounds on the album, I'm in the same line.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Running

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DDWJMUVW
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed December 13, 2023 9:44 pm

Re: Running

Post by DDWJMUVW »

Vindicator wrote:Lukin is a DIFFERENT kind of word salad. In a good way. He's screaming on Lukin. He's letting it rip. It's different to an Ole / Superblood spritz word salad.

Lukin is 1 minute long. I don't even consider it a song. It's truly filler a la wasted reprise, aye, red dot, etc.

Just took a third listen - like it more and more. It's never gonna be a 5 star track but, honestly, I think it COULD be their best version of a quick punk effort.

Ed could be spot on in that regard (best work yet). Oh and I love the guitars. It's been a long time since we heard REAL distortion on the guitars. Too much bluesy crunch over the last 15 years. S/T had a good bit of it, but since then, not much.
"For me, it's all about the time we're having just playing the songs. So if it's kind of a mindless good time, then....."
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Running

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Running

Post by stip »

that's a chat GPT review. It has a very particular voice
falcaoruiz
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu March 19, 2020 10:09 pm

Re: Running

Post by falcaoruiz »

Why does stupid old Vedder have to come and always ruin everything with his word salad that he can't even pull off anymore?

Make this a heavy instrumental, keep Eddie's voice/melody in the bridge, and you've got a killer song.

The rest of the band should make themselves a favor and fire the singer.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

DDWJMUVW wrote:
Vindicator wrote:Lukin is a DIFFERENT kind of word salad. In a good way. He's screaming on Lukin. He's letting it rip. It's different to an Ole / Superblood spritz word salad.

Lukin is 1 minute long. I don't even consider it a song. It's truly filler a la wasted reprise, aye, red dot, etc.

Just took a third listen - like it more and more. It's never gonna be a 5 star track but, honestly, I think it COULD be their best version of a quick punk effort.

Ed could be spot on in that regard (best work yet). Oh and I love the guitars. It's been a long time since we heard REAL distortion on the guitars. Too much bluesy crunch over the last 15 years. S/T had a good bit of it, but since then, not much.
yep
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Running

Post by Leatherhead »

I like it.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20146
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Twitter: twitter.com/uglyfurballz4life
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Running

Post by tree_ »

stip wrote:
stip wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:(stip's 8000-word missive that's longer than the song itself in 3, 2, 1...)

Friday night at the earliest, I'm afraid. Still haven't heard it
tree_ wrote:we should feed stips other write-ups into ChatGPT and predict what he might say about this new song

Or sooner

here's what it came up with:



It’s been a while since Pearl Jam dropped their last album, and with anticipation mounting, the arrival of their new single "Running" has sparked quite the conversation among fans. Now, Pearl Jam is no stranger to pushing boundaries and exploring new sonic territories, but "Running" takes a bold leap into the realm of fun, light punk rock—a departure that many fans didn't see coming.

Let's dive into this sonic offering and see what it's all about.

First off, "Running" immediately grabs your attention with its energetic and upbeat vibe. It's a departure from the weighty themes and spacious arrangements we've come to expect from Pearl Jam, opting instead for a more lively and spirited sound. This shift in direction may catch some fans off guard, but it's a refreshing change of pace that showcases the band's versatility.

Now, let's address the elephant in the room—the production. Many fans have been vocal about their dissatisfaction with the production on "Running," citing it as too loud and forced. And it's true that the production does have a certain intensity to it that may not sit well with everyone. The raw energy of the punk rock sound is dialed up to eleven, bordering on overwhelming at times. But hey, sometimes you've got to crank up the volume and let loose, right?

As for Eddie Vedder's vocals, opinions seem to be divided. Some listeners find his delivery to be too forced and unconfident, lacking the trademark swagger and conviction we've come to expect from him. It's a departure from his usual style, no doubt about it. But others may appreciate the raw and unfiltered quality of his vocals, adding a sense of urgency and authenticity to the track.

Despite its polarizing reception, "Running" still manages to capture the essence of Pearl Jam's music in its own unique way. It's a high-energy anthem that's sure to get your blood pumping and your feet moving. And while it may not be the Pearl Jam we're used to, it's certainly a bold statement from a band that's never been afraid to take risks.

So, whether you're on board with the punk rock vibes of "Running" or you're yearning for the familiar comforts of their classic sound, one thing's for sure—Pearl Jam continues to defy expectations and push the boundaries of what's possible in rock music. And for that, they deserve credit. After all, isn't that what rock 'n' roll is all about?
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Running

Post by RockPusher »

I really don't like that the disturbing twinkles that were clearly poor resolution artifacts on my first snippet listens seem to actually be part of the song. Weird, weird choice.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

tragabigzanda wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
Thejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
Yeah. If this is how it sounds on the album, I'm in the same line.
what is happening right now? I thought we'd need to live with the album for like two years before the tides started turning
tidepods*
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Running

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Running

Post by Strat »

tragabigzanda wrote:
oneway23 wrote:
Strat wrote:
Thejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
i cant hear a single CYmbal or Crash ring out :(
No decay or reverb tails at all on both songs so far...air-tight production, sounds like maybe no ambient mics so far? Is that off-base?
I'm sure they used room mics when tracking, but none of it's there in the mix
Why would they do such a thing to us :waah:
User avatar
Ledbetterdays
A Return To Form
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue January 29, 2013 3:45 am

Re: Running

Post by Ledbetterdays »

Running (working lyrics)

Yes or No

You got me running
got me running
but the (something) never ends

you got me running
or else I'm done in

you got me coming as you're going
in the cage that never ends
you got me running
yeah the second coming

contain us
contain us

lost in the tunnel
and the tunnel aint no fun now
I hope you know the shit your pushing

control us
control us

lost in the tunnel
and the tunnel's getting funneled
like the sewage in the plumbing
cuz we left the fucking water running

yes or no

got me diving
got me diving
got me deep I've hit the bens
when I'm sewn in I'm too late coming

got me running
got me running
like the (something) that never ends
I'm feeling done in
it's rather stunning

contain us
contain us

lost in the tunnel
and the tunnel aint no fun now
I hope you know the shit your pushing

control us
control us

lost in the tunnel
and the tunnel's getting funneled
like the sewage in the plumbing
cuz we left the fucking water running

we're cleared for
for liftoff
I close my eyes
take off
living in the shadows
crossing my fingers
a date with the gallows
and a reprieve's not looking likely

(ed's rant---not gonna try)
you got me runnning (x4)
oh please
you are the tunnel
I am unstable
fuck off
off
Last edited by Ledbetterdays on Thu March 21, 2024 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Running

Post by oneway23 »

tragabigzanda wrote:
oneway23 wrote:
Strat wrote:
Thejambi wrote:I’ll give Trag this one. The production 100% is getting in the way of this song.
i cant hear a single CYmbal or Crash ring out :(
No decay or reverb tails at all on both songs so far...air-tight production, sounds like maybe no ambient mics so far? Is that off-base?
I'm sure they used room mics when tracking, but none of it's there in the mix
Fucking producer makes one of the greatest drummers of his generation sound like a plug-in. Does this mean I hate Pearl Jam?
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

time to turn off the "imagine this album, but produced like Vitalogy" part of my brain

I have zero problems with the songs I'm hearing so far
Release_Me
AnalLog
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 10:01 am

Re: Running

Post by Release_Me »

Thankfully(?), I'm not affected by the production much. I'm going to love a song if I love the song, regardless of how it's recorded on an album. I want the songs to be good enough, primarily. So far, 2 songs that aren't my favourite PJ style have come and gone without negatively affecting my anticipation of the album. Something Special is the only other song that I need to not suck and I think I'll really dig this album, provided the other songs live up to the hype.
Pearl Jam is the only band I'll spend money on.
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Running

Post by oneway23 »

Ms Harmless wrote:time to turn off the "imagine this album, but produced like Vitalogy" part of my brain

I have zero problems with the songs I'm hearing so far
I would love to do that sometimes, trust me. I can't help it...These are the things that hit my ears first
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
Post Reply