Running

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate the Song

5 Stars
13
8%
4 Stars
33
21%
3 Stars
75
47%
2 Stars
30
19%
1 Star
9
6%
 
Total votes: 160

Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

Ms Harmless wrote:Stip was correct, Running sounds good followed by Dark Matter; say what you want about the production values, at least there's a consistency here
inb4 someone says "consistently BAD!!!!@#=%%"
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36752
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Running

Post by Jorge »

Strat wrote:The fact that they literally had Brendan o Brien remix and master self titled to obviously remove the harshness but then went full Tits with this is truly something
No joke, this reminds me of the sound of the latest Blink 182 album. All overblown mush, The sound is much worse on "Running" than "Dark Matter," too. I guess they wanted to make it sound more in-your-face? But it sounds like FM radio
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Mike
Future Drummer
Posts: 3130
Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: Running

Post by Mike »

Jorge wrote:
Strat wrote:The fact that they literally had Brendan o Brien remix and master self titled to obviously remove the harshness but then went full Tits with this is truly something
No joke, this reminds me of the sound of the latest Blink 182 album. All overblown mush, The sound is much worse on "Running" than "Dark Matter," too. I guess they wanted to make it sound more in-your-face? But it sounds like FM radio
Starting to think Andrew Watt has absolutely no clue what made Pearl Jam good
User avatar
lecherouslittlestump
known prankster
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 10:39 am

Re: Running

Post by lecherouslittlestump »

To the audiophiles, what is your opinion on how Gigaton sounds?
"A man who doesn't spend time with the Jamily can never be a real man," - Don Corelone
User avatar
EBowie
A Return To Form
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 2:14 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Running

Post by EBowie »

I'm liking it the more I listen. It's certainly not a top tier song but it doesn't deserve the hate it's getting either.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Running

Post by stip »

I don’t know. this is a song type pearl jam have tried to pull of multiple times, to fairly limited effect. this feels like their most successful go at it. production values aside, what Watt has captured in both songs we’be heard so far is the energy, open hearted ferocity, and spirit of pearl jam, and in a way that lets Eddie lean into his weathered voice without trying to ignore or push through it.

I love Dark Matter. I like Running. But what i really love is how these songs feel, and cant wait to hear what else is out there


*this was a response to Mike
C4lukin
A Return To Form
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu June 27, 2013 8:40 am

Re: Ru

Post by C4lukin »

tragabigzanda wrote:DAHK MATTAH!!!
Now you are just lazily farting your subconscious into the thread.

I really want to participate in the discussion, but I cannot, when this is a thing.

Obsessive trolls are cute for a moment, but they drive people away. Anyone visiting this place for the first time, are going to feel gross. Someone like me who has been around for awhile, is going to be repelled. I don’t get it.
Last edited by C4lukin on Fri March 22, 2024 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Running

Post by blueviper »

This song I guess is average?

It has “skip” written all over it
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
Mike
Future Drummer
Posts: 3130
Joined: Sat August 24, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: Running

Post by Mike »

stip wrote:I don’t know. this is a song type pearl jam have tried to pull of multiple times, to fairly limited effect. this feels like their most successful go at it. production values aside, what Watt has captured in both songs we’be heard so far is the energy, open hearted ferocity, and spirit of pearl jam, and in a way that lets Eddie lean into his weathered voice without trying to ignore or push through it.

I love Dark Matter. I like Running. But what i really love is how these songs feel, and cant wait to hear what else is out there


*this was a response to Mike
It's a good possibility that it's ME that does not understand what most Pearl Jam fans love about Pearl Jam. Both Dark Matter and Running are lacking a lot of the qualities that made me fall in love with Pearl Jam. I'm talking about both early Pearl Jam and the middle period. These songs certainly have lots of energy but I'm missing a certain looseness and warmth. Even at their most rocking their songs hat an airiness and effortlessness while both singles so far feel like they are TRYING too hard to rock. I think it's useless to assume too much about the creation of the songs but they both feel like they had the agenda to rock as hard as possible. It's hard for me to put in words.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6610
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Running

Post by Farmer John »

Just listened on Apple Music using Apple's patented Spatial Audio technology.

It's still overblown mush, but the mush has been separated. You can pick out a lot more details, but everything is still so harsh. It seems like they made a conscious effort to crank the levels on this track (compared to Dark Matter at least)
User avatar
DDWJMUVW
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 703
Joined: Wed December 13, 2023 9:44 pm

Re: Running

Post by DDWJMUVW »

I’m beginning to think that some folks who have described these new songs as “too loud” or a “wall of mush” have a vastly different musical background than I. Of course while PJ was the first love, I spent a lot of time in the mid/late 90s and early 2000s listening to east coast punk bands (saves the day, H2O, mxpx, millencolin - Swedish - etc).

You want heavy? Those bands are actually heavy. So to me the new DM songs are not offensive and indeed I’m finding a lot to like bc of what I’ve enjoyed outside of PJ over the last 30 years or so. DM has elements of SG and Running sounds a bit like it could be a Millencolin song from the early 00s, but both retain that PJ feel enough to keep them honest.

I for one, welcome the onslaught. Of course I’ll indulge in the mid tempo tracks as well, but the two songs I’ve heard so far grab me immediately. I cannot say that for half of GIG, almost all of LB, and much of BS. Sonically, there are so many things I’ve picked out and love hearing and that’s huge for my listening enjoyment. Also, I think STIP said this as well but the songs just FEEL good to me.
"For me, it's all about the time we're having just playing the songs. So if it's kind of a mindless good time, then....."
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6610
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Running

Post by Farmer John »

What do people think of Sleater-Kinney's The Woods? I like that album and that is definitely "overblown". Is it "mush", though? Is there a way to do to overblown well?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Running

Post by stip »

some folks also have hyper sensitive ears, apparently.

I am going to crank running and dark matter in my car. its going to be a great commute
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Running

Post by stip »

Farmer John wrote:What do people think of Sleater-Kinney's The Woods? I like that album and that is definitely "overblown". Is it "mush", though? Is there a way to do to overblown well?
i really struggled with it. having ed sing mostly in these lower registers/lower in the mix helps keep these songs grounded and digestable
Tj
Future Drummer
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am

Re: Running

Post by Tj »

I don't mean this in a negative way. I am really into running. The one think that strikes me is it feels like a retooling of a formula that has gotten a bit tired. It sounds fresh . It leans into a different punk influence a little less Ramones a little bit more Motor Head. I can also listen to each Parr and get the why of each players choices and parts. I enjoy how Mike is kind of bouncing around kind of floundering right under the surface. I feel like I am being set up for a Social d style solo the out of nowhere comes a tsunami alarm .
Fattie_Vedder
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed February 26, 2020 8:43 am

Re: Running

Post by Fattie_Vedder »

Mike wrote:
stip wrote:I don’t know. this is a song type pearl jam have tried to pull of multiple times, to fairly limited effect. this feels like their most successful go at it. production values aside, what Watt has captured in both songs we’be heard so far is the energy, open hearted ferocity, and spirit of pearl jam, and in a way that lets Eddie lean into his weathered voice without trying to ignore or push through it.

I love Dark Matter. I like Running. But what i really love is how these songs feel, and cant wait to hear what else is out there


*this was a response to Mike
It's a good possibility that it's ME that does not understand what most Pearl Jam fans love about Pearl Jam. Both Dark Matter and Running are lacking a lot of the qualities that made me fall in love with Pearl Jam. I'm talking about both early Pearl Jam and the middle period. These songs certainly have lots of energy but I'm missing a certain looseness and warmth. Even at their most rocking their songs hat an airiness and effortlessness while both singles so far feel like they are TRYING too hard to rock. I think it's useless to assume too much about the creation of the songs but they both feel like they had the agenda to rock as hard as possible. It's hard for me to put in words.
The weird thing is, I totally agree with you. Yield is my favorite album for the very things you describe, and sonically feels like the antithesis of what Dark Matter will sound like production-wise. But I’m still enjoying these songs. And if the whole album ends up sounding like this, then at least it’s consistent in the loud vibe it’s going for.

I recognize there’s a contradiction in both wanting a more subtle, layered, and nuanced PJ sound while also really digging the energy and even the sound of the new album; maybe because it’s different than anything before. It could be a fun exercise to try and imagine what these songs would sound like produced on different albums. The songs already have plenty of energy in them, they didn’t need Watt to crank the dials up to 11. That’s specifically the part that feels inauthentic to me. The band’s playing and energy does feel authentic and great; the extra push from the production does not. But I still don’t totally hate it, even if I long for what it could sound like based on my frame of reference from what they’ve done before. Honestly it’s a little weird and I still can’t place it.
Last edited by Fattie_Vedder on Fri March 22, 2024 12:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

this song works for me precisely because it's a wall of noise, and that's exactly what I think this kind of song should be; I remember thinking that "Comatose" wasn't working entirely for me because Ed was giving it some welly but the guitars and drums behind him were far too polite and melodic; it seems that whatever approach they went for on this song is particular to this song, it's a two minute wall of noise
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Running

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Running

Post by Ms Harmless »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:Stip was correct, Running sounds good followed by Dark Matter; say what you want about the production values, at least there's a consistency here
Virtually every album in the world has consistent production values, that’s exactly what mastering is for
yes thank you Trag, but you did say "virtually", correct? so I can hear when they don't; and I said this because there are two Pearl Jam albums I feel the opposite way about (LB and BS, but particularly LB), and my personal wish for this album is simply that it is more consistent in sound than those two
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36752
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Running

Post by Jorge »

DDWJMUVW wrote:I’m beginning to think that some folks who have described these new songs as “too loud” or a “wall of mush” have a vastly different musical background than I. Of course while PJ was the first love, I spent a lot of time in the mid/late 90s and early 2000s listening to east coast punk bands (saves the day, H2O, mxpx, millencolin - Swedish - etc). You want heavy? Those bands are actually heavy. So to me the new DM songs are not offensive
It's not really about the music style, about whether it's "heavy". You mentioned Millencolin. Listen to Pennybridge Pioneers. You can really hear the tone of the guitars, there's colors to it, everything sounds well balanced, nuances in playing really shine through even though the music is aggressive. You can turn the volume up and it sounds good, like you're walking closer towards the band instead of sticking your ear in the PA. With "Running" you turn the volume up and it just sounds like a bunch of white noise, abrasive and indistinct
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Post Reply