dimejinky99 wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:On liability:
If we’re going by ‘ancient maritime laws’ that means any cargo in the water is salvage and you or I can go get it and claim it.
‘Ancient maritime laws’ only apply to open sea though and don’t even apply there. This is a river. Not the open sea.
Baltimore Bridge Collapse
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
What do you make the bridge out of? Unobtanium? Nah, truss bridges are fine, they'd just have big concrete and rock barriers around the bride supports so ships run into those rather than the bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:You can’t have a metal frame bridge which is basically a giant mecanno set over the busiest port in America when it has 200,000 ton ships coming in and out every few hours.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Who knew?
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
A ton, I'm sure. Probably going to be one of those buy prefabricated sections and ship them over from China dealies.BurtReynolds wrote:"The Key Bridge, which opened in March 1977 after five years of construction and cost an estimated $110 million..."
Imagine how much it will cost to rebuild.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
BurtReynolds wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:On liability:
If we’re going by ‘ancient maritime laws’ that means any cargo in the water is salvage and you or I can go get it and claim it.
‘Ancient maritime laws’ only apply to open sea though and don’t even apply there. This is a river. Not the open sea.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
simple schoolboy wrote:What do you make the bridge out of? Unobtanium? Nah, truss bridges are fine, they'd just have big concrete and rock barriers around the bride supports so ships run into those rather than the bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:You can’t have a metal frame bridge which is basically a giant mecanno set over the busiest port in America when it has 200,000 ton ships coming in and out every few hours.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Who knew?
If any of the crew have a couple of tons of coke stashed among that cargo I’d say they’re shitting right now. That’s if they haven’t already made for the Canadian border.
It’s Baltimore yo
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Yeah, good thing there isn't any place around the ship at 1:30 in the morning to dump it.dimejinky99 wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:What do you make the bridge out of? Unobtanium? Nah, truss bridges are fine, they'd just have big concrete and rock barriers around the bride supports so ships run into those rather than the bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:You can’t have a metal frame bridge which is basically a giant mecanno set over the busiest port in America when it has 200,000 ton ships coming in and out every few hours.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Who knew?
If any of the crew have a couple of tons of coke stashed among that cargo I’d say they’re shitting right now. That’s if they haven’t already made for the Canadian border.
It’s Baltimore yo
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Now you’re thinking.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah, good thing there isn't any place around the ship at 1:30 in the morning to dump it.dimejinky99 wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:What do you make the bridge out of? Unobtanium? Nah, truss bridges are fine, they'd just have big concrete and rock barriers around the bride supports so ships run into those rather than the bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:You can’t have a metal frame bridge which is basically a giant mecanno set over the busiest port in America when it has 200,000 ton ships coming in and out every few hours.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Who knew?
If any of the crew have a couple of tons of coke stashed among that cargo I’d say they’re shitting right now. That’s if they haven’t already made for the Canadian border.
It’s Baltimore yo
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23452
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Hopefully they can work or making bridges safer after this.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22777
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
I’d like to take this opportunity to remind everyone here that while B and I may have equal disdain for one another’s worldview, I will very gladly and openly acknowledge and even celebrate the things we agree on. Without gagging. Because I am open minded. And I realize there’s more that binds us than separates us. And I am a better person.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
(she/him/theirs)
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Bammer wrote:I’d like to take this opportunity to remind everyone here that while B and I may have equal disdain for one another’s worldview, I will very gladly and openly acknowledge and even celebrate the things we agree on. Without gagging. Because I am open minded. And I realize there’s more that binds us than separates us. And I am a better person.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Building bridges rather than burning them.
A rare moment of maturity and hands across a divide.
Well done bammer
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
my takeaway is bammer has no gag-reflexBammer wrote:I’d like to take this opportunity to remind everyone here that while B and I may have equal disdain for one another’s worldview, I will very gladly and openly acknowledge and even celebrate the things we agree on. Without gagging. Because I am open minded. And I realize there’s more that binds us than separates us. And I am a better person.B wrote:I don't know. Sounds made up to me. I am [gags a bit] with Bammer.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40171
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Are you saying new bridges would stand up to that behemoth ramming into them? I find that hard to believe.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
If there's a lobbyist for tug boat manufacturers, they are super excited about all the possible new mandates that should be coming down the pipe.wease wrote:Are you saying new bridges would stand up to that behemoth ramming into them? I find that hard to believe.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Maybe instead of building stronger bridges, we should focus on building weaker ships.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27318
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
age old question: pipe or pike?simple schoolboy wrote:If there's a lobbyist for tug boat manufacturers, they are super excited about all the possible new mandates that should be coming down the pipe.wease wrote:Are you saying new bridges would stand up to that behemoth ramming into them? I find that hard to believe.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Ok yes to addressing infrastructure … but this incident, I’d argue, is not related at all. A huge ship crashed into a bridge.dimejinky99 wrote:Silver lining if any hopefully this sees the current or next administration start to fix Americas infrastructure. Watched a thing about the rail network a while back and it’s falling apart and a miracle stuff like this doesn’t happen all the time with trains.
And the design of that bridge wouldn’t see it built today as it wouldn’t be able to deal with such a collision. Mordern bridges would easily.
Ship couldn’t have been going at any speed at all. Just the sheer weight of it took it out.
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23452
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
«Ship sank after being hit by a flock of seagulls. The captain commented; «it’s due to those damn new Bridge-safety regulations».washing machine wrote:Maybe instead of building stronger bridges, we should focus on building weaker ships.
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23452
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Now there is reporting that the crew issued a mayday, and the bridge ended up being closed off. Unfortunately not in time for some of the cars on the bridge right when it was hit, but it helped keep more off of it in the moments that followed. I feel bad for the victims here but as someone said earlier, imagine if this was during rush hour.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23452
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse
I don’t believe it’s a conspiracy. Just an accident.