Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Dark Matter

5 Stars
119
56%
4 Stars
65
31%
3 Stars
19
9%
2 Stars
2
1%
2 Star
1
0%
%#*! Andrew Watt
5
2%
 
Total votes: 211

User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16298
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

FlatSideofaDog wrote:
Arthur Morgan wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:
Arthur Morgan wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:Wait, could Ed not play the WFS riff?

He got about 80%?of it
It must be Watt's riff on the record, then. If they went with Ed's similar riff from way back in the day he'd know it 100%.
Watt must have written the bridge to Insignificance too, then. It took him like 6 years to get that one right.
Well, I don't know if you play guitar, but if you do, think about a simple riff you've carried around for years and then being asked to play it on the spot. It's very intuitive.
Yeah it doesn’t mean Ed was lying. He just was on the spot and I was holding my breathe for him
No, I don't think he's lying at all. What I'm getting at is: if the two riffs are similar but not the exact same, which riff is on the record? Ed's or Watt's? Stone said the song was 'Andrew's baby', which gives me the impression the recorded riff is Watt's. And if the recorded riff s not intuitive to Ed, that's another consideration.
It's definitely more Wotman's riff than Ed's based on the latter's very hesitant attempts to play something remotely similar on Stern.

I mean, it makes sense: the song was initially created during the Earthling sessions, the songs for which were co-written between Ed and Wotman. I can easily believe Wotman brought in a riff, Ed says it reminds him a bit of something he once wrote, and they knocked together a rough demo without thinking too hard about who was responsible for what (they were co-writing, after all). It doesn't fit on Earthling but they later bring it to the band in the Dark Matter sessions where it takes on new life.

I think the 'combined riff' fudge is some intentional obfuscation to make it sound less like the hotshot producer has started writing the tunes, which I suspect is the perception they're trying to avoid - but the explanation doesn't ring true, so it ends up sounding worse than simply admitting the song was built on a riff Wotman brought to Ed while making his solo record.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9318
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Kevin Davis »

People do seem to be really connecting with this record, even people who haven't liked or been interested in new Pearl Jam for a while. Maybe we're going to find out that what's different about this album is that Watt actually wrote the whole thing.
Last edited by Kevin Davis on Mon April 22, 2024 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13646
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

lots of people overthinking this, there's no reason Ed would lie
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13646
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

if you're both working on a song, the individual parts you had are going to disappear and be subsumed into what the song becomes; it's very reasonable to think Ed might have forgotten the origins of a riff written two years ago or whatever when it's not even his role to play it now
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Strat »

Ms Harmless wrote:lots of people overthinking this, there's no reason Ed would lie
Unless you dislike Ed and are disgusted by the idea of pursued collaborates. Perfect thing to jump on for validation!

Much love
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13646
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

Strat wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:lots of people overthinking this, there's no reason Ed would lie
Unless you dislike Ed and are disgusted by the idea of pursued collaborates. Perfect thing to jump on for validation!

Much love
exactly
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by RockPusher »

Ms Harmless wrote:lots of people overthinking this, there's no reason Ed would lie
I agree, but also, it doesn't matter. Pearl Jam just released an album of great songs that we now have some proof will be great live. So many great bands over the years had any number of people involved in the songwriting process.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
tommy
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4456
Joined: Sat August 05, 2023 11:13 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by tommy »

If Wottman helping with the writing is the difference between this album and LB then I'm fully on board.
User avatar
basically_infirmed
A Return To Form
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu March 19, 2020 6:40 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by basically_infirmed »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:lots of people overthinking this, there's no reason Ed would lie
Unless you dislike Ed and are disgusted by the idea of pursued collaborates. Perfect thing to jump on for validation!

Much love
exactly
well and also if that somehow is true I hope he writes more songs for them
User avatar
basically_infirmed
A Return To Form
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu March 19, 2020 6:40 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by basically_infirmed »

tommy wrote:If Wottman helping with the writing is the difference between this album and LB then I'm fully on board.
right
BoltofLightning
A Return To Form
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat July 13, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by BoltofLightning »

Birds in Hell wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:
Arthur Morgan wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:
Arthur Morgan wrote:
FlatSideofaDog wrote:Wait, could Ed not play the WFS riff?
He got about 80%?of it
It must be Watt's riff on the record, then. If they went with Ed's similar riff from way back in the day he'd know it 100%.
Watt must have written the bridge to Insignificance too, then. It took him like 6 years to get that one right.
Well, I don't know if you play guitar, but if you do, think about a simple riff you've carried around for years and then being asked to play it on the spot. It's very intuitive.
Yeah it doesn’t mean Ed was lying. He just was on the spot and I was holding my breathe for him
No, I don't think he's lying at all. What I'm getting at is: if the two riffs are similar but not the exact same, which riff is on the record? Ed's or Watt's? Stone said the song was 'Andrew's baby', which gives me the impression the recorded riff is Watt's. And if the recorded riff s not intuitive to Ed, that's another consideration.
It's definitely more Wotman's riff than Ed's based on the latter's very hesitant attempts to play something remotely similar on Stern.

I mean, it makes sense: the song was initially created during the Earthling sessions, the songs for which were co-written between Ed and Wotman. I can easily believe Wotman brought in a riff, Ed says it reminds him a bit of something he once wrote, and they knocked together a rough demo without thinking too hard about who was responsible for what (they were co-writing, after all). It doesn't fit on Earthling but they later bring it to the band in the Dark Matter sessions where it takes on new life.

I think the 'combined riff' fudge is some intentional obfuscation to make it sound less like the hotshot producer has started writing the tunes, which I suspect is the perception they're trying to avoid - but the explanation doesn't ring true, so it ends up sounding worse than simply admitting the song was built on a riff Wotman brought to Ed while making his solo record.
Or you could, you know, listen to the words coming out of the band members’ mouths without reading things that aren’t there.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43431
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

yeah guys, its kinda weird a few of you are still on the fence with Watt. He did great with the band, the new album is awesome, the band is really happy and ready to tour.

Happy times.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43431
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

damn that YL on Stern reminded me of how awesome that song is.

Mike was on fire really.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

I assume Watt also did the Waiting for Stevie visualizer.
Spoiler: show
I hear it's pretty good














Spoiler: show
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13646
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

RockPusher wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:lots of people overthinking this, there's no reason Ed would lie
I agree, but also, it doesn't matter. Pearl Jam just released an album of great songs that we now have some proof will be great live. So many great bands over the years had any number of people involved in the songwriting process.
I agree with that too
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43431
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

Some posters seem almost unhappy that the album is actually this good
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9318
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Kevin Davis »

BoltofLightning wrote:Or you could, you know, listen to the words coming out of the band members’ mouths without reading things that aren’t there.
It's precisely this line of thinking that has you waiting 15 years for EP's that never come :cry:
Tj
Future Drummer
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Tj »

VinylGuy wrote:Some posters seem almost unhappy that the album is actually this good
Some poster don't actually like pearl jam anymore.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43431
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

Kevin Davis wrote:
BoltofLightning wrote:Or you could, you know, listen to the words coming out of the band members’ mouths without reading things that aren’t there.
It's precisely this line of thinking that has you waiting 15 years for EP's that never come :cry:
well, only Mike said that
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16298
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

You guys, I like the album.

I just think it's funny to dig at the band members (OK, mainly Ed) when they're telling some transparent half-truths because they have their own sensitivities about authenticity, etc. - and like I said above, whatever Ed and Andrew came up with together, it's clear the band really brought the song to life.
Post Reply