Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate S/T

5 Stars
11
19%
4 Stars
19
33%
3 Stars
26
46%
2 Stars
0
No votes
1 Star
1
2%
 
Total votes: 57

User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Leatherhead »

A lot of the time I feel like there's not enough going on in these songs. There's not much specific to listen for. Maybe it's the production. I still love it though. 4/5.
Since we seem to be ranking post-Yield.

Binaural
Riot Act
Gigaton
S/T

BS

LB
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

oh shit, 2006! not 16
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by dad »

Ms Harmless wrote:oh shit, 2006! not 16
man, it's still really wild to think about how they went from No Code to S/T in only 10 years.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Kevin Davis »

Riot Act
Binaural

S/T

Gigaton
Backspacer
Lightning Bolt
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42766
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

dad wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:oh shit, 2006! not 16
man, it's still really wild to think about how they went from No Code to S/T in only 10 years.
yeah, and everything they did and happened in between.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by dad »

VinylGuy wrote:
dad wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:oh shit, 2006! not 16
man, it's still really wild to think about how they went from No Code to S/T in only 10 years.
yeah, and everything they did and happened in between.
absolutely.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
Thurman Murman
AnalLog
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sun January 06, 2013 4:25 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Thurman Murman »

Leatherhead wrote: Since we seem to be ranking post-Yield.

Binaural
Riot Act
Gigaton
S/T

BS

LB
Same "tiers" as you but i'd go...

Gigaton
Binaural (sessions as a whole would leap over Gigaton)
S/T
Riot Act

Backspacer

Lightning Bolt
User avatar
igotworms
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed September 11, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by igotworms »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:"Marker in the Sand" is so underrated
This has been my favorite S/T tune since day one and it always surprises me how people say the chorus is weak -- I think it's beautiful, redemptive, fulfilling, uplifting, any positive adjective like that I can throw at it. I love the way it just completely deflates the tension and fury of the verses. Such a great tune.

The songs on this album have aged really well for me but I overwhelmingly prefer the live versions. The record itself is probably the one I find myself going back to least.
usually I'd rather listen to anything in studio over live stuff (unless I'm at a gig) but I went to Reading Festival 2006 and they were excellent, S/T songs and all
I loved that show. Was disappointed they didn't play more off of S/T at the time but I guess it was a festival. The versions of Even Flow and Blood were off the chain, plus Sad was just such a great surprise.
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Brett »

This is the Pearl Jam album that has risen the highest from my original feelings. When it came out, I was feeling burnt out on the band (I had them in regular rotation from 2000/01 or so, through to 2005), and I felt like this album downplayed most of what I found most interesting about the band. It turned me off their music for a while, compounded by the weakness of Backspacer 3 years later.

A couple years ago, I started to warm up to the album thanks mostly to the Brickwallhater remaster and some strong defense from fans on here. Now when I listen to it, I like it as much as something like Ten, Vs., or Gigaton. It's mostly really good with a few clunkers, but not as strong to me as Binaural or Yield.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

igotworms wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:"Marker in the Sand" is so underrated
This has been my favorite S/T tune since day one and it always surprises me how people say the chorus is weak -- I think it's beautiful, redemptive, fulfilling, uplifting, any positive adjective like that I can throw at it. I love the way it just completely deflates the tension and fury of the verses. Such a great tune.

The songs on this album have aged really well for me but I overwhelmingly prefer the live versions. The record itself is probably the one I find myself going back to least.
usually I'd rather listen to anything in studio over live stuff (unless I'm at a gig) but I went to Reading Festival 2006 and they were excellent, S/T songs and all
I loved that show. Was disappointed they didn't play more off of S/T at the time but I guess it was a festival. The versions of Even Flow and Blood were off the chain, plus Sad was just such a great surprise.
Blood, Sad and Corduroy I remember being impeccable
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

tragabigzanda wrote:Jfc ruddo
Image
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28034
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Monkey_Driven »

So, I don't think I had ever fully listened to the 2017 Brenden O'Brien mix before yesterday. What an interesting experience that was.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by wease »

Monkey_Driven wrote:So, I don't think I had ever fully listened to the 2017 Brenden O'Brien mix before yesterday. What an interesting experience that was.
I’ve still never heard it. Would you recommend it?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

so I just heard Fleetwood Mac in "Unemployable" for the first time, which is kind of cool and interesting
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

wease wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:So, I don't think I had ever fully listened to the 2017 Brenden O'Brien mix before yesterday. What an interesting experience that was.
I’ve still never heard it. Would you recommend it?
definitely-feels like a fresh listen
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28034
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Monkey_Driven »

stip wrote:
wease wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:So, I don't think I had ever fully listened to the 2017 Brenden O'Brien mix before yesterday. What an interesting experience that was.
I’ve still never heard it. Would you recommend it?
definitely-feels like a fresh listen
It didn't give me a headache after the first 6 songs like the original version, so that's good.
DeeDee
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 520
Joined: Tue September 17, 2013 4:09 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by DeeDee »

I don't come back to it at all, but I burnt it to the ground when it came out.

What a year, what a tour.

4 stars.
User avatar
oneway23
Future Drummer
Posts: 2158
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by oneway23 »

wease wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:So, I don't think I had ever fully listened to the 2017 Brenden O'Brien mix before yesterday. What an interesting experience that was.
I’ve still never heard it. Would you recommend it?
You weren't directing this to me, but, MC's drums don't sound as much like slapping wet cellophane anymore, so, there's that.

Don't expect any revelations, but, it's a definite improvement.
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42766
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

I hate how he mutes the guitars on Severed Hand.

Other than that i dont quite remember anything about it
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Post Reply